On 8/9/10 7:33 AM, W1TEF wrote:
On Sun, 08 Aug 2010 21:28:56 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 08 Aug 2010 14:34:13 -0400,
wrote:

On Sun, 08 Aug 2010 11:59:54 -0400, wrote:


What? Dude - that is some really strange logic.

WTF? dude...uh why? why is blaming the black guy for the white guy's
failure not racist

You're not making any sense. Let me put it this way - if President
Obama continues President Bush's policies, which he has, and you
criticize President Obama for doing so you're a racist?

How about for things Obama did - or didn't - or does? Can one
complain about the President without being a racist?

care to be specific? you guys blame obama for soical security and the
civil war. anything else?

I'm not blaming anybody for anything. I'm asking a simple question -
is it racist to criticize President Obama over what he is doing - did
- does?

too vague to be meaningful

So in other words, you don't have an answer or can't formulate one
that makes sense because it's much easier to throw around a insult
based on nothing more than your opinion.

I'll make it simple for you - is it racist to blame the Obama
Administration for Deepwater Horizon.

try using english. it might help

It is English and perfectly understandable. Your inability to
properly parse the question is not my issue.


Kinda depends on how you criticize, right, Tom the Wookie?

If you say, "I don't like Obama's policies in whatever, because I
think they are moving us closer to socialism," then that is non-racist.

If you say, "I don't like that Kenyan's policies in whatever,
because I think that half-black guy is moving us closer to socialism,"
then that is racist.

The actual racists here include Canuck, Herring, Larry by whatever
handle, your little short friend Scott, and about a half-dozen others,
several of whom try to be subtle about their hatred of blacks,