On 17/07/2010 7:39 PM, mmc wrote:
California:

The Governor of California is jogging with his dog along a nature trail. A
coyote jumps out, bites the Governor and attacks his dog.


1. The Governor starts to intervene, but reflects upon the movie "Bambi"
and then realizes he should stop; the coyote is only doing what is natural.

2. He calls animal control. Animal Control captures coyote and bills the
State $200 testing it for diseases and $500 for relocating it.

3. He calls a veterinarian. The vet collects the dead dog and bills the
State $200 testing it for diseases.

4. The Governor goes to hospital and spends $3,500 getting checked for
diseases from the coyote and on getting his bite wound bandaged.

5. The running trail gets shut down for 6 months while Fish& Game conducts
a $100,000 survey to make sure the area is free of dangerous animals.

6. The Governor spends $50,000 in state funds implementing a "coyote
awareness" program for residents of the area.

7. The State Legislature spends $2 million to study how to better treat
rabies and how to permanently eradicate the disease throughout the world.

8. The Governor's security agent is fired for not stopping the attack
somehow and for letting the Governor attempt to intervene.

9. Additional cost to State of California: $75,000 to hire and train a new
security agent with additional special training the nature of coyotes.

10. PETA protests the coyote's relocation and files suit against the State.


Arizona:

The Governor of Arizona is jogging with her dog along a nature trail. A
Coyote jumps out and attacks her dog.

1. The Governor shoots the coyote with her State-issued pistol and keeps
jogging. The Governor has spent $0.50 on a .45 ACP hollow point cartridge.

2. The Buzzards eat the dead coyote.



And that's why California is broke.


Yep, a real shortage of rational polticians, good that Arizona has one.

--

Government has liberals, idealists and lawyers, but where is the common
sense?

On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 21:53:13 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:



Yep, a real shortage of rational polticians, good that Arizona has one.

you can just see the right wing canuck when the cop asks him

'vhere are your PAPERZ!!! herr canuck....'

he's all for it

On 17/07/2010 10:14 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 21:53:13 -0600,
wrote:



Yep, a real shortage of rational polticians, good that Arizona has one.

you can just see the right wing canuck when the cop asks him

'vhere are your PAPERZ!!! herr canuck....'

he's all for it

Got pulled over once in Florida, does that count? My papers were in order.
--

Government has liberals, idealists and lawyers, but where is the common
sense?

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 17/07/2010 10:14 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 21:53:13 -0600,
wrote:



Yep, a real shortage of rational polticians, good that Arizona has one.

you can just see the right wing canuck when the cop asks him

'vhere are your PAPERZ!!! herr canuck....'

he's all for it

Got pulled over once in Florida, does that count? My papers were in
order.

Ah... so that's when you were deported and now can't get back into this
great country.

On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 19:01:43 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 17/07/2010 10:14 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 21:53:13 -0600,
wrote:



Yep, a real shortage of rational polticians, good that Arizona has one.

you can just see the right wing canuck when the cop asks him

'vhere are your PAPERZ!!! herr canuck....'

he's all for it

Got pulled over once in Florida, does that count? My papers were in order.

he doesnt know the difference between a license to operate a vehicle

and having your papers to prove you're an american

but he's a fascist canadian...very very stuipd

wrote in message
...
On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 23:09:45 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

Got pulled over once in Florida, does that count? My papers were in
order.

he doesnt know the difference between a license to operate a vehicle

and having your papers to prove you're an american


Since the feds passed "Real ID" that is going to be the same thing.
The cop can use the unique ID number on the back of your license
(buried on the mag stripe and in that dot code) and find out
everything the government knows about you.
That is why an Arizona driver's license is "papers",

Arizona has no business determining immigration policy. It's a federal
issue.

On 7/19/10 11:40 AM, wrote:
On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 23:07:53 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


Arizona has no business determining immigration policy. It's a federal
issue.


The problem is the feds are not doping their job. As we have said
several times here, states are already enforcing immigration laws. It
is particularly true in Florida. I can't speak for others because I
don't live there. This US v AZ is just a political move to get votes
for the democrats in the mid term. The US is going to lose the case.

Perhaps we could pull most of our military forces out of europe and
japan, and swear 100,000 of them into the border patrol. That way, we
could get something useful out of the military. And to satisfy the
racist conservative republicans, we could restrict legal immigration to
those who can prove their aryan ancestry.

wrote in message
...
On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 23:07:53 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


Arizona has no business determining immigration policy. It's a federal
issue.


The problem is the feds are not doping their job. As we have said
several times here, states are already enforcing immigration laws. It
is particularly true in Florida. I can't speak for others because I
don't live there. This US v AZ is just a political move to get votes
for the democrats in the mid term. The US is going to lose the case.

I believe MMS was doping just fine.

There's a difference between ENFORCEMENT and creating new laws. New laws are
the domain of the Fed in this case. There are lots of things that the Fed
screws up. That doesn't give states license to be creatively making new law.

I'm glad you're able to predict the future. Can you tell us who'll be
replacing Scalia?

wrote in message
...
On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 11:15:27 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


wrote in message
. ..
On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 23:07:53 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


Arizona has no business determining immigration policy. It's a federal
issue.


The problem is the feds are not doping their job. As we have said
several times here, states are already enforcing immigration laws. It
is particularly true in Florida. I can't speak for others because I
don't live there. This US v AZ is just a political move to get votes
for the democrats in the mid term. The US is going to lose the case.

I believe MMS was doping just fine.

Huh?

Your post had a small typo.

There's a difference between ENFORCEMENT and creating new laws. New laws
are
the domain of the Fed in this case. There are lots of things that the Fed
screws up. That doesn't give states license to be creatively making new
law.

There are thousands of state laws that mirror federal law., Are you
saying a state can't have a law against kidnapping?

No. I'm saying that AZ created a new law that doesn't just mirror Fed law.

You can't even make a 14th amendment case since you do not have the
right to violate federal law.

They usurped Federal law. That's a no-no.

I'm glad you're able to predict the future. Can you tell us who'll be
replacing Scalia?

I have been pretty good at predicting the future so far. I did say
Goldman would come out of their case OK. They ended up copping to
admitting they might have had better disclosure and gave the
government part of what they made on the deal.

wrote:
On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 23:07:53 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


Arizona has no business determining immigration policy. It's a federal
issue.


The problem is the feds are not doping their job. As we have said
several times here, states are already enforcing immigration laws. It
is particularly true in Florida. I can't speak for others because I
don't live there. This US v AZ is just a political move to get votes
for the democrats in the mid term. The US is going to lose the case.

She (a self-proclaimed lawyer) doesn't realize that Arizona is enforcing
federal laws.