On 7/9/10 5:18 PM, Harold' wrote:
"Harry wrote in message
...
On 7/9/10 4:32 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 07:35:09 -0400, "Harold"
wrote:

Notice the expressions on the military guy's faces at the end of the
clip.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/...ary/index.html


The real vote on this will be at the enlistment office.
If the southern rednecks who make up the core of the infantry do not
show up and the current ones fail to reenlist expect a draft or a
sharp decrease in our ability to wage these crusades.
You can't run a war with interpreters and language specialists.

One would hope for a sharp decrease in our ability to wage trumped-up
wars, a la George W. Bush.

You must be a muslim faggot, Krause. There's no other explqanation.




Dubya's war against Iraq was built on a series of canards. We spend far,
far too much, somewhere near $500 billion a year, on the military. We
could cut that in half and still spend Xtimes more than any other
military power or even combination of powers.

As for gays in the military, it's only an issue for ****head homophobes
like you.

"Harry ?" wrote in message
...
On 7/9/10 4:32 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 07:35:09 -0400, "Harold"
wrote:

Notice the expressions on the military guy's faces at the end of the
clip.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/...ary/index.html


The real vote on this will be at the enlistment office.
If the southern rednecks who make up the core of the infantry do not
show up and the current ones fail to reenlist expect a draft or a
sharp decrease in our ability to wage these crusades.
You can't run a war with interpreters and language specialists.

One would hope for a sharp decrease in our ability to wage trumped-up
wars, a la George W. Bush.

You must be a muslim faggot, Krause. There's no other explqanation.

wrote in message
...
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 07:35:09 -0400, "Harold"
wrote:

Notice the expressions on the military guy's faces at the end of the clip.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/...ary/index.html


The real vote on this will be at the enlistment office.
If the southern rednecks who make up the core of the infantry do not
show up and the current ones fail to reenlist expect a draft or a
sharp decrease in our ability to wage these crusades.
You can't run a war with interpreters and language specialists.

Since most of the public supports its repeal, I doubt that's going to stop
recruitment. People act as though there are no gays in the military. The
point of repealing this is so that those who are there don't have to lie
about it.

"Harry ?" wrote in message
...
On 7/9/10 5:18 PM, Harold' wrote:
"Harry wrote in message
...
On 7/9/10 4:32 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 07:35:09 -0400, "Harold"
wrote:

Notice the expressions on the military guy's faces at the end of the
clip.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/...ary/index.html


The real vote on this will be at the enlistment office.
If the southern rednecks who make up the core of the infantry do not
show up and the current ones fail to reenlist expect a draft or a
sharp decrease in our ability to wage these crusades.
You can't run a war with interpreters and language specialists.

One would hope for a sharp decrease in our ability to wage trumped-up
wars, a la George W. Bush.

You must be a muslim faggot, Krause. There's no other explqanation.




Dubya's war against Iraq was built on a series of canards. We spend far,
far too much, somewhere near $500 billion a year, on the military. We
could cut that in half and still spend Xtimes more than any other military
power or even combination of powers.

As for gays in the military, it's only an issue for ****head homophobes
like you.

I guess there's no denying that you are a muslim faggot then.

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
...
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 07:35:09 -0400, "Harold"
wrote:

Notice the expressions on the military guy's faces at the end of the
clip.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/...ary/index.html


The real vote on this will be at the enlistment office.
If the southern rednecks who make up the core of the infantry do not
show up and the current ones fail to reenlist expect a draft or a
sharp decrease in our ability to wage these crusades.
You can't run a war with interpreters and language specialists.

Since most of the public supports its repeal, I doubt that's going to stop
recruitment. People act as though there are no gays in the military. The
point of repealing this is so that those who are there don't have to lie
about it.


You really are stupid.

On Jul 9, 6:28*pm, "Harold'" wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message

...





wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 07:35:09 -0400, "Harold"
wrote:

Notice the expressions on the military guy's faces at the end of the
clip.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/...ary/index.html

The real vote on this will be at the enlistment office.
If the southern rednecks who make up the core of the infantry do not
show up and the current ones fail to reenlist expect a draft or a
sharp decrease in our ability to wage these crusades.
You can't run a war with interpreters and language specialists.

Since most of the public supports its repeal, I doubt that's going to stop
recruitment. People act as though there are no gays in the military. The
point of repealing this is so that those who are there don't have to lie
about it.

You really are stupid.

I used to think it was a put-on. But unfortunately, like donny, it's
the real deal.
The old commercial with the egg sizzling in the pan comes to mind.
What a waste.

"Harold'" wrote in message
...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
...
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 07:35:09 -0400, "Harold"
wrote:

Notice the expressions on the military guy's faces at the end of the
clip.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/...ary/index.html


The real vote on this will be at the enlistment office.
If the southern rednecks who make up the core of the infantry do not
show up and the current ones fail to reenlist expect a draft or a
sharp decrease in our ability to wage these crusades.
You can't run a war with interpreters and language specialists.

Since most of the public supports its repeal, I doubt that's going to
stop recruitment. People act as though there are no gays in the military.
The point of repealing this is so that those who are there don't have to
lie about it.


You really are stupid.


Coming from one who has trouble breathing by choice, that's not saying much.

"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Jul 9, 6:28 pm, "Harold'" wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message

...





wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 07:35:09 -0400, "Harold"
wrote:

Notice the expressions on the military guy's faces at the end of the
clip.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/...ary/index.html

The real vote on this will be at the enlistment office.
If the southern rednecks who make up the core of the infantry do not
show up and the current ones fail to reenlist expect a draft or a
sharp decrease in our ability to wage these crusades.
You can't run a war with interpreters and language specialists.

Since most of the public supports its repeal, I doubt that's going to
stop
recruitment. People act as though there are no gays in the military.
The
point of repealing this is so that those who are there don't have to
lie
about it.

You really are stupid.

I used to think it was a put-on. But unfortunately, like donny, it's
the real deal.
The old commercial with the egg sizzling in the pan comes to mind.
What a waste.

You are not what anyone would call an egghead. Perhaps an eggshell head...

"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Jul 9, 6:28 pm, "Harold'" wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message

...





wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 07:35:09 -0400, "Harold"
wrote:

Notice the expressions on the military guy's faces at the end of the
clip.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/...ary/index.html

The real vote on this will be at the enlistment office.
If the southern rednecks who make up the core of the infantry do not
show up and the current ones fail to reenlist expect a draft or a
sharp decrease in our ability to wage these crusades.
You can't run a war with interpreters and language specialists.

Since most of the public supports its repeal, I doubt that's going to
stop
recruitment. People act as though there are no gays in the military.
The
point of repealing this is so that those who are there don't have to
lie
about it.

You really are stupid.

I used to think it was a put-on. But unfortunately, like donny, it's
the real deal.
The old commercial with the egg sizzling in the pan comes to mind.
What a waste.

Taking the 'Palm Sisters' out on the town this weekend?

On 7/9/10 8:12 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 15:02:46 -0700,
wrote:

The real vote on this will be at the enlistment office.
If the southern rednecks who make up the core of the infantry do not
show up and the current ones fail to reenlist expect a draft or a
sharp decrease in our ability to wage these crusades.
You can't run a war with interpreters and language specialists.

Since most of the public supports its repeal, I doubt that's going to stop
recruitment. People act as though there are no gays in the military. The
point of repealing this is so that those who are there don't have to lie
about it.

Again, the real vote is not going to be a poll of the general public,
it will be among those who are likely to join the military or those
who might reenlist. That is why Gates sent out those questionnaires he
is in so much trouble over.


Cut the $500 billion we spend on the military in half. Get rid of half
the personnel, keeping only a portion of those who can deal with 21st
Century realities.