"Harry ?" wrote in message
...
On 7/9/10 4:32 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 07:35:09 -0400, "Harold"
wrote:

Notice the expressions on the military guy's faces at the end of the
clip.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/...ary/index.html


The real vote on this will be at the enlistment office.
If the southern rednecks who make up the core of the infantry do not
show up and the current ones fail to reenlist expect a draft or a
sharp decrease in our ability to wage these crusades.
You can't run a war with interpreters and language specialists.

One would hope for a sharp decrease in our ability to wage trumped-up
wars, a la George W. Bush.

You must be a muslim faggot, Krause. There's no other explqanation.

On 7/9/10 5:18 PM, Harold' wrote:
"Harry wrote in message
...
On 7/9/10 4:32 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 07:35:09 -0400, "Harold"
wrote:

Notice the expressions on the military guy's faces at the end of the
clip.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/...ary/index.html


The real vote on this will be at the enlistment office.
If the southern rednecks who make up the core of the infantry do not
show up and the current ones fail to reenlist expect a draft or a
sharp decrease in our ability to wage these crusades.
You can't run a war with interpreters and language specialists.

One would hope for a sharp decrease in our ability to wage trumped-up
wars, a la George W. Bush.

You must be a muslim faggot, Krause. There's no other explqanation.




Dubya's war against Iraq was built on a series of canards. We spend far,
far too much, somewhere near $500 billion a year, on the military. We
could cut that in half and still spend Xtimes more than any other
military power or even combination of powers.

As for gays in the military, it's only an issue for ****head homophobes
like you.

"Harry ?" wrote in message
...
On 7/9/10 5:18 PM, Harold' wrote:
"Harry wrote in message
...
On 7/9/10 4:32 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 07:35:09 -0400, "Harold"
wrote:

Notice the expressions on the military guy's faces at the end of the
clip.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/...ary/index.html


The real vote on this will be at the enlistment office.
If the southern rednecks who make up the core of the infantry do not
show up and the current ones fail to reenlist expect a draft or a
sharp decrease in our ability to wage these crusades.
You can't run a war with interpreters and language specialists.

One would hope for a sharp decrease in our ability to wage trumped-up
wars, a la George W. Bush.

You must be a muslim faggot, Krause. There's no other explqanation.




Dubya's war against Iraq was built on a series of canards. We spend far,
far too much, somewhere near $500 billion a year, on the military. We
could cut that in half and still spend Xtimes more than any other military
power or even combination of powers.

As for gays in the military, it's only an issue for ****head homophobes
like you.

I guess there's no denying that you are a muslim faggot then.

On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:18:26 -0400, Harry ?
wrote:

As for gays in the military, it's only an issue for ****head homophobes
like you.

It'll be an issue when the openly gay fags start getting fantail
liberty and fragged by their fellow troops.

"DAB" wrote in message
news
On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:18:26 -0400, Harry ?
wrote:

As for gays in the military, it's only an issue for ****head homophobes
like you.

It'll be an issue when the openly gay fags start getting fantail
liberty and fragged by their fellow troops.

Whew... no homophobe there...

On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 23:50:09 -0400, DAB
wrote:

On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:18:26 -0400, Harry ?
wrote:

As for gays in the military, it's only an issue for ****head homophobes
like you.

It'll be an issue when the openly gay fags start getting fantail
liberty and fragged by their fellow troops.

Where are they going to get the homophobes to do the fragging? Who
says that the troops will go outside the law on what is to most a
trivial issue. I think most in the military, like most outside of it,
will mind their own business.I think it would be like race. When I was
in, 40+ years ago, it was your ass if you did anything racist. Nobody
did.

Casady

On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 23:50:09 -0400, DAB wrote:

On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:18:26 -0400, Harry ?
wrote:

As for gays in the military, it's only an issue for ****head homophobes
like you.

It'll be an issue when the openly gay fags start getting fantail
liberty and fragged by their fellow troops.

Blanket party time?

I can't imagine what would happen if an openly gay guy walked into the barracks,
dropped his bag on the floor, and said, "Here I am, boys."
--
John H

All decisions are the result of binary thinking.

wrote in message
...
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 07:35:09 -0400, "Harold"
wrote:

Notice the expressions on the military guy's faces at the end of the clip.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/...ary/index.html


The real vote on this will be at the enlistment office.
If the southern rednecks who make up the core of the infantry do not
show up and the current ones fail to reenlist expect a draft or a
sharp decrease in our ability to wage these crusades.
You can't run a war with interpreters and language specialists.

Since most of the public supports its repeal, I doubt that's going to stop
recruitment. People act as though there are no gays in the military. The
point of repealing this is so that those who are there don't have to lie
about it.

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
...
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 07:35:09 -0400, "Harold"
wrote:

Notice the expressions on the military guy's faces at the end of the
clip.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/...ary/index.html


The real vote on this will be at the enlistment office.
If the southern rednecks who make up the core of the infantry do not
show up and the current ones fail to reenlist expect a draft or a
sharp decrease in our ability to wage these crusades.
You can't run a war with interpreters and language specialists.

Since most of the public supports its repeal, I doubt that's going to stop
recruitment. People act as though there are no gays in the military. The
point of repealing this is so that those who are there don't have to lie
about it.


You really are stupid.

On Jul 9, 6:28*pm, "Harold'" wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message

...





wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 07:35:09 -0400, "Harold"
wrote:

Notice the expressions on the military guy's faces at the end of the
clip.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/...ary/index.html

The real vote on this will be at the enlistment office.
If the southern rednecks who make up the core of the infantry do not
show up and the current ones fail to reenlist expect a draft or a
sharp decrease in our ability to wage these crusades.
You can't run a war with interpreters and language specialists.

Since most of the public supports its repeal, I doubt that's going to stop
recruitment. People act as though there are no gays in the military. The
point of repealing this is so that those who are there don't have to lie
about it.

You really are stupid.

I used to think it was a put-on. But unfortunately, like donny, it's
the real deal.
The old commercial with the egg sizzling in the pan comes to mind.
What a waste.