"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Jul 9, 6:28 pm, "Harold'" wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message

...





wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 07:35:09 -0400, "Harold"
wrote:

Notice the expressions on the military guy's faces at the end of the
clip.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/...ary/index.html

The real vote on this will be at the enlistment office.
If the southern rednecks who make up the core of the infantry do not
show up and the current ones fail to reenlist expect a draft or a
sharp decrease in our ability to wage these crusades.
You can't run a war with interpreters and language specialists.

Since most of the public supports its repeal, I doubt that's going to
stop
recruitment. People act as though there are no gays in the military.
The
point of repealing this is so that those who are there don't have to
lie
about it.

You really are stupid.

I used to think it was a put-on. But unfortunately, like donny, it's
the real deal.
The old commercial with the egg sizzling in the pan comes to mind.
What a waste.

You are not what anyone would call an egghead. Perhaps an eggshell head...

"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Jul 9, 6:28 pm, "Harold'" wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message

...





wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 07:35:09 -0400, "Harold"
wrote:

Notice the expressions on the military guy's faces at the end of the
clip.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/...ary/index.html

The real vote on this will be at the enlistment office.
If the southern rednecks who make up the core of the infantry do not
show up and the current ones fail to reenlist expect a draft or a
sharp decrease in our ability to wage these crusades.
You can't run a war with interpreters and language specialists.

Since most of the public supports its repeal, I doubt that's going to
stop
recruitment. People act as though there are no gays in the military.
The
point of repealing this is so that those who are there don't have to
lie
about it.

You really are stupid.

I used to think it was a put-on. But unfortunately, like donny, it's
the real deal.
The old commercial with the egg sizzling in the pan comes to mind.
What a waste.

Taking the 'Palm Sisters' out on the town this weekend?

On Jul 9, 7:49*pm, "YukonBound" wrote:
"Jack" wrote in message

...





On Jul 9, 6:28 pm, "Harold'" wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message

...

wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 07:35:09 -0400, "Harold"
wrote:

Notice the expressions on the military guy's faces at the end of the
clip.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/...ary/index.html

The real vote on this will be at the enlistment office.
If the southern rednecks who make up the core of the infantry do not
show up and the current ones fail to reenlist expect a draft or a
sharp decrease in our ability to wage these crusades.
You can't run a war with interpreters and language specialists.

Since most of the public supports its repeal, I doubt that's going to
stop
recruitment. People act as though there are no gays in the military.
The
point of repealing this is so that those who are there don't have to
lie
about it.

You really are stupid.

I used to think it was a put-on. *But unfortunately, like donny, it's
the real deal.
The old commercial with the egg sizzling in the pan comes to mind.
What a waste.

Taking the 'Palm Sisters' out on the town this weekend?

Weirdo. Take it to alt.sexual perversions.

YukonBound wrote:


"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Jul 9, 6:28 pm, "Harold'" wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message

...





wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 07:35:09 -0400, "Harold"
wrote:

Notice the expressions on the military guy's faces at the end of the
clip.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/...ary/index.html


The real vote on this will be at the enlistment office.
If the southern rednecks who make up the core of the infantry do not
show up and the current ones fail to reenlist expect a draft or a
sharp decrease in our ability to wage these crusades.
You can't run a war with interpreters and language specialists.

Since most of the public supports its repeal, I doubt that's going
to stop
recruitment. People act as though there are no gays in the
military. The
point of repealing this is so that those who are there don't have
to lie
about it.

You really are stupid.

I used to think it was a put-on. But unfortunately, like donny, it's
the real deal.
The old commercial with the egg sizzling in the pan comes to mind.
What a waste.

Taking the 'Palm Sisters' out on the town this weekend?


Dumb response. Can't you do a *little* better?

"Harold'" wrote in message
...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
...
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 07:35:09 -0400, "Harold"
wrote:

Notice the expressions on the military guy's faces at the end of the
clip.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/...ary/index.html


The real vote on this will be at the enlistment office.
If the southern rednecks who make up the core of the infantry do not
show up and the current ones fail to reenlist expect a draft or a
sharp decrease in our ability to wage these crusades.
You can't run a war with interpreters and language specialists.

Since most of the public supports its repeal, I doubt that's going to
stop recruitment. People act as though there are no gays in the military.
The point of repealing this is so that those who are there don't have to
lie about it.


You really are stupid.


Coming from one who has trouble breathing by choice, that's not saying much.

On 7/9/10 8:12 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 15:02:46 -0700,
wrote:

The real vote on this will be at the enlistment office.
If the southern rednecks who make up the core of the infantry do not
show up and the current ones fail to reenlist expect a draft or a
sharp decrease in our ability to wage these crusades.
You can't run a war with interpreters and language specialists.

Since most of the public supports its repeal, I doubt that's going to stop
recruitment. People act as though there are no gays in the military. The
point of repealing this is so that those who are there don't have to lie
about it.

Again, the real vote is not going to be a poll of the general public,
it will be among those who are likely to join the military or those
who might reenlist. That is why Gates sent out those questionnaires he
is in so much trouble over.


Cut the $500 billion we spend on the military in half. Get rid of half
the personnel, keeping only a portion of those who can deal with 21st
Century realities.

wrote in message
...
On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 20:15:40 -0400, Harry ?
wrote:

On 7/9/10 8:12 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 15:02:46 -0700,
wrote:

The real vote on this will be at the enlistment office.
If the southern rednecks who make up the core of the infantry do not
show up and the current ones fail to reenlist expect a draft or a
sharp decrease in our ability to wage these crusades.
You can't run a war with interpreters and language specialists.

Since most of the public supports its repeal, I doubt that's going to
stop
recruitment. People act as though there are no gays in the military.
The
point of repealing this is so that those who are there don't have to
lie
about it.

Again, the real vote is not going to be a poll of the general public,
it will be among those who are likely to join the military or those
who might reenlist. That is why Gates sent out those questionnaires he
is in so much trouble over.


Cut the $500 billion we spend on the military in half. Get rid of half
the personnel, keeping only a portion of those who can deal with 21st
Century realities.

It is really more like $696 billion but I do agree with the "half"
part. The problem is, if we are still going to wage war with 14th
century opponents we need some people who are not hindered by reality.
Nobody in their right mind would go up into the mountains of
Afghanistan ... for anything.
Maybe they could exempt certain units from don't ask. That might be a
compromise everyone could live with.

And, God forbid that someone who's gay should serve in the military..

On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 16:32:05 -0400, wrote:

On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 07:35:09 -0400, "Harold"
wrote:

Notice the expressions on the military guy's faces at the end of the clip.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/...ary/index.html


The real vote on this will be at the enlistment office.
If the southern rednecks who make up the core of the infantry do not
show up and the current ones fail to reenlist expect a draft or a
sharp decrease in our ability to wage these crusades.

recruitin levels are at an all time high. in fact the USCG is cutting
1000 enlisted because reenlistment is so high


You can't run a war with interpreters and language specialists.

and you cant run one without them either

On Jul 9, 9:34*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 16:32:05 -0400, wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 07:35:09 -0400, "Harold"
wrote:

Notice the expressions on the military guy's faces at the end of the clip.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/...ary/index.html

The real vote on this will be at the enlistment office.
If the southern rednecks who make up the core of the infantry do not
show up and the current ones fail to reenlist expect a draft or a
sharp decrease in our ability to wage these crusades.

recruitin levels are at an all time high. in fact the USCG is cutting
1000 enlisted because reenlistment is so high


A quote:
"But it turns out that while Mr. Dow Jones believes that our Great
Recession is over (that’s a joke), one invisible hand in our market
doesn’t know what the other is doing. Americans are going so broke in
this jobless recovery that instead of finding work in our not-so-happy-
fun-time economy, they’d rather get shot up and shoot at other people
in Iraq, Afghanistan, and other places.

That’s right, the Pentagon reported on this day of Dow 10,000 that our
strained Armed Forces have beat their recruiting goals for the fiscal
year, driven by economic unease."

http://trueslant.com/level/2009/10/1...f-two-numbers/

You see, the uptick in recruiting levels has nothing to do with asking
or telling, but instead it has everything to do with BO's jobless
"recovery". The emporer is spending us into the ground, and even the
teenagers now understand.

We won't know what effect ask/tell has until things change. Until
then, you're blowing smoke. As usual?

On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 20:42:08 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:


That’s right, the Pentagon reported on this day of Dow 10,000 that our
strained Armed Forces have beat their recruiting goals for the fiscal
year, driven by economic unease."

http://trueslant.com/level/2009/10/1...f-two-numbers/

You see, the uptick in recruiting levels has nothing to do with asking
or telling, but instead it has everything to do with BO's jobless
"recovery". The emporer is spending us into the ground, and even the
teenagers now understand.

it's funny watching the right spin this. their policies would have
produced 25% unemployment, like 1929. but because obama's black, they
simply think he's wrong.