| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan,alt.zen,alt.philosophy.zen,rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Is the world better off for having more animals?
On 6/24/2010 11:18 AM, oxtail wrote:
[...] No, the world is not better off. The world does not have a welfare. |
|
#2
posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan,alt.zen,alt.philosophy.zen,rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is the world better off for having more animals?
Fred C. Dobbs wrote:
On 6/24/2010 11:18 AM, oxtail wrote: [...] No, the world is not better off. The world does not have a welfare. I didn't ask for your opinion. Your uneducated guess is almost irrelevant. I asked whether you know of any famous thinkers who say that the world is not better off just because there are more animals in it. There must be some. Do you know of any? -- Oxtail is not doing what he thinks he is doing here. |
|
#3
posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan,alt.zen,alt.philosophy.zen,rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is the world better off for having more animals?
On 6/24/2010 11:59 AM, oxtail wrote:
Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/24/2010 11:18 AM, oxtail wrote: [...] No, the world is not better off. The world does not have a welfare. I didn't ask for your opinion. I didn't give you an opinion. |
|
#4
posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan,alt.zen,alt.philosophy.zen,rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is the world better off for having more animals?
Fred C. Dobbs wrote:
On 6/24/2010 11:59 AM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/24/2010 11:18 AM, oxtail wrote: [...] No, the world is not better off. The world does not have a welfare. I didn't ask for your opinion. I didn't give you an opinion. Are they factual statements? If so, are they falsifiable? -- Oxtail is not doing what he thinks he is doing here. |
|
#5
posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan,alt.zen,alt.philosophy.zen,rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is the world better off for having more animals?
On 6/24/2010 12:11 PM, oxtail wrote:
Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/24/2010 11:59 AM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/24/2010 11:18 AM, oxtail wrote: [...] No, the world is not better off. The world does not have a welfare. I didn't ask for your opinion. I didn't give you an opinion. Are they factual statements? Yes. If so, are they falsifiable? Have a go at it. |
|
#6
posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan,alt.zen,alt.philosophy.zen,rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is the world better off for having more animals?
Fred C. Dobbs wrote:
On 6/24/2010 12:11 PM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/24/2010 11:59 AM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/24/2010 11:18 AM, oxtail wrote: [...] No, the world is not better off. The world does not have a welfare. I didn't ask for your opinion. I didn't give you an opinion. Are they factual statements? Yes. If so, are they falsifiable? Have a go at it. Care to show us how? They are your statements, after all. -- Oxtail is not doing what he thinks he is doing here. |
|
#7
posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan,alt.zen,alt.philosophy.zen,rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is the world better off for having more animals?
On 6/24/2010 12:22 PM, oxtail wrote:
Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/24/2010 12:11 PM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/24/2010 11:59 AM, oxtail wrote: Fred C. Dobbs wrote: On 6/24/2010 11:18 AM, oxtail wrote: [...] No, the world is not better off. The world does not have a welfare. I didn't ask for your opinion. I didn't give you an opinion. Are they factual statements? Yes. If so, are they falsifiable? Have a go at it. Care to show us how? Do your own homework, fat boy. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
