In article ,
says...

On 6/15/10 10:23 AM, moose wrote:
On 6/15/2010 9:15 AM, Harry wrote:
On 6/15/10 9:09 AM, Wiley wrote:


**** off.


Gosh...your posts read like you're either loogy or flajim.

Yep...you've got everyone fooled, Wile...er, Wiley.


Let us know when you decide. I'm sure it's important for you to know
who's who.



It doesn't matter...**** by any name still stinks.

Then you need to train your felines to aim for the litter box.


My cats are well-trained. If you're loogy or flajim, you're more like
what we scoop out of the litter boxes.

What's the matter, fella? You so trashed your usual handle(s) here that
no one will pay attention to either loogy or flajim?

Some of us are man enough to post with our real names or initials. And
then there are cowardly pussies like...you.

So you are saying nom de plume is a coward?
I don't know if she is or not, but one thing is certain. She's a hell of
a lot smarter than you for withholding personal information. What's to
be gained by advertizing yourself on the internet? How many clients do
you figure you lost because of your internet behavior stretching 15
years? You're a fool Krause. You let your narcissism get in the way of
common sense.


A. Nom de plume is not a man. The rules are different for women on the
internet.

B. You're a coward.

C. None.

D. You're a coward. Worth mentioning twice.

Harry, buddy. Why would rules be different for women?

On 6/15/10 11:07 AM, YukonBound wrote:


Harry, buddy. Why would rules be different for women?

eternal-september.org - not Don...just a trashy ID spoofer.

On 6/15/2010 11:09 AM, Harry wrote:
On 6/15/10 11:07 AM, YukonBound wrote:


Harry, buddy. Why would rules be different for women?

eternal-september.org - not Don...just a trashy ID spoofer.


I agree. Don would never ask you a leading question like that.

In article ,
says...

On 6/15/2010 11:09 AM, Harry wrote:
On 6/15/10 11:07 AM, YukonBound wrote:


Harry, buddy. Why would rules be different for women?

eternal-september.org - not Don...just a trashy ID spoofer.


I agree. Don would never ask you a leading question like that.

Lead this, question boy!

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

On 6/15/10 10:23 AM, moose wrote:
On 6/15/2010 9:15 AM, Harry wrote:
On 6/15/10 9:09 AM, Wiley wrote:


**** off.


Gosh...your posts read like you're either loogy or flajim.

Yep...you've got everyone fooled, Wile...er, Wiley.


Let us know when you decide. I'm sure it's important for you to know
who's who.



It doesn't matter...**** by any name still stinks.

Then you need to train your felines to aim for the litter box.


My cats are well-trained. If you're loogy or flajim, you're more like
what we scoop out of the litter boxes.

What's the matter, fella? You so trashed your usual handle(s) here that
no one will pay attention to either loogy or flajim?

Some of us are man enough to post with our real names or initials. And
then there are cowardly pussies like...you.

So you are saying nom de plume is a coward?
I don't know if she is or not, but one thing is certain. She's a hell of
a lot smarter than you for withholding personal information. What's to
be gained by advertizing yourself on the internet? How many clients do
you figure you lost because of your internet behavior stretching 15
years? You're a fool Krause. You let your narcissism get in the way of
common sense.


A. Nom de plume is not a man. The rules are different for women on the
internet.

B. You're a coward.

C. None.

D. You're a coward. Worth mentioning twice.

Harry, buddy. Why would rules be different for women?

Spoofer alert! I would never, ever doubt anything Harry said. I just
don't understand why no one else but me believes his tales....