On 6/15/2010 10:22 AM, Harry wrote:
On 6/15/10 10:23 AM, moose wrote:
On 6/15/2010 9:15 AM, Harry wrote:
On 6/15/10 9:09 AM, Wiley wrote:


**** off.


Gosh...your posts read like you're either loogy or flajim.

Yep...you've got everyone fooled, Wile...er, Wiley.


Let us know when you decide. I'm sure it's important for you to know
who's who.



It doesn't matter...**** by any name still stinks.

Then you need to train your felines to aim for the litter box.


My cats are well-trained. If you're loogy or flajim, you're more like
what we scoop out of the litter boxes.

What's the matter, fella? You so trashed your usual handle(s) here that
no one will pay attention to either loogy or flajim?

Some of us are man enough to post with our real names or initials. And
then there are cowardly pussies like...you.

So you are saying nom de plume is a coward?
I don't know if she is or not, but one thing is certain. She's a hell of
a lot smarter than you for withholding personal information. What's to
be gained by advertizing yourself on the internet? How many clients do
you figure you lost because of your internet behavior stretching 15
years? You're a fool Krause. You let your narcissism get in the way of
common sense.


A. Nom de plume is not a man. The rules are different for women on the
internet.

How do you know that?

B. You're a coward.

By your definition perhaps. A better definition is how you conducted
yourself in the early 60s. That was truly cowardly behavior on your
part. There's no denying it.

C. None.

Oh come on now. Do you think people don't check a fella out before they
hire him?


D. You're a coward. Worth mentioning twice.
See above, Comrade.