Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#37
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 9, 12:09*pm, hk wrote:
On 5/9/10 12:01 PM, moose wrote: On 5/9/2010 11:34 AM, Loogypicker wrote: On May 9, 11:15 am, wrote: On 5/9/10 10:58 AM, YukonBound wrote: You seem to be fixated on homosexual practices lately Looney. I sized you up as a whacked out, bad tempered, southern hillbilly redneck.... not as a 'closet dweller'. Is the spring air causing you to come on out? Loogyfocher: whacked out, bad tempered, southern hillbilly redneck Damned close to perfect description of "our boy loogy." The only remaining question is how he's going to behave *if* he shows up here. Most adults, when told not to show up on private property, stay away. But "our boy loogy," being a "whacked out, bad tempered, southern hillbilly redneck," may believe the usual rules don't apply. -- The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name. Where do you want to meet up so that you can act like that to my face, pussy? Make sure you show up during daylight so your widow can collect big time from Krause. http://www.usacarry.com/forums/maryl...arm-news/3976-... It's too bad you and your compadres, flajim, can't read: "Maryland has adopted the “castle doctrine.” Under the castle doctrine, “a man faced with the danger of an attack upon his dwelling need not retreat from his home to escape the danger, but instead may stand his ground and, if necessary to repel the attack, may kill the attacker.” See Burch v. State, 346 Md. 253, 283-4, 696 A.2d 443, 458 (1997) quoting Crawford v. State, 231 Md. 354, 361, 190 A.2d 538, 541 (1963). "Courts are split as to whether a duty to retreat exists under the castle doctrine in situations involving cohabitants, guests, and invitees.." Your boy loogyfocher would not qualify here as a cohabitant, guest or invitee. I doubthe wants to meet Mr. Shadow. -- The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - That would be all well and fine, except you forget, you aren't on the title to the house. Also, did you notice that part where it states that the "courts are split", dumb ass? And did you notice that you have to be "attacked"?? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
So much for global warming . . . | Cruising | |||
Global Partnership | Tall Ship Photos | |||
Global Warming? | General | |||
More on Global Warming | General | |||
First global warming, now this!!! | ASA |