"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 23:59:23 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
. ..
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 17:57:26 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:


inflation is at 2%. is that too high for you?

jesus you guys are stupid


It's amazing what you can do when you steal enough money from the future
generations!

as opposed to wall street who stole it last year?

you kinda forgot that one, didn't you?



Last year and the year before that and many years before that. Fanny May
and Freddie Mac. Phony book keeping. Pay $110 million in bonus money to
Mr. Raines, and he number 2. Clinton guy. So Clinton's justice department
says bad, and settles for $5 million return and not even a slap on the
wrist. 10-20 years in Leavenworth would have sent a signal to Wall Street.
But nope, they get to steal for the next couple administrations. They not
stealing now?

On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 22:03:13 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:





Last year and the year before that and many years before that. Fanny May
and Freddie Mac. Phony book keeping. Pay $110 million in bonus money to
Mr. Raines, and he number 2. Clinton guy. So Clinton's justice department
says bad, and settles for $5 million return and not even a slap on the
wrist. 10-20 years in Leavenworth would have sent a signal to Wall Street.
But nope, they get to steal for the next couple administrations. They not
stealing now?

gee. that all happened under bush's regime didn't it?

clinton wasn't president in 2007.

you guys...you really need to learn some history. if you don't know
who was president....

was business do you have blowing off your bazoo about clinton?

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 22:03:13 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:





Last year and the year before that and many years before that. Fanny May
and Freddie Mac. Phony book keeping. Pay $110 million in bonus money to
Mr. Raines, and he number 2. Clinton guy. So Clinton's justice
department
says bad, and settles for $5 million return and not even a slap on the
wrist. 10-20 years in Leavenworth would have sent a signal to Wall
Street.
But nope, they get to steal for the next couple administrations. They not
stealing now?

gee. that all happened under bush's regime didn't it?

clinton wasn't president in 2007.

you guys...you really need to learn some history. if you don't know
who was president....

was business do you have blowing off your bazoo about clinton?



He appointed Raines. He oversaw Harry's cashcow to buy a lobsta boat.
Worldcom. And a bunch of others like Enron.

On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 10:58:21 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:






He appointed Raines. He oversaw Harry's cashcow to buy a lobsta boat.
Worldcom. And a bunch of others like Enron.

and bush presided over wall street's 9 trillion theft of the US
economy

On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 10:59:58 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 06:17:51 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 22:03:13 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:





Last year and the year before that and many years before that. Fanny May
and Freddie Mac. Phony book keeping. Pay $110 million in bonus money to
Mr. Raines, and he number 2. Clinton guy. So Clinton's justice department
says bad, and settles for $5 million return and not even a slap on the
wrist. 10-20 years in Leavenworth would have sent a signal to Wall Street.
But nope, they get to steal for the next couple administrations. They not
stealing now?

gee. that all happened under bush's regime didn't it?

clinton wasn't president in 2007.

No he was president when Enron, Worldcom and Adelphia were doing their
stealing.

gee. and who was president when AIG, lehman bros, goldman sachs stole
trillions?

and since the CFMA was passed in 2000 and bush was president about a
year later...seems there wasnt alot of time for stealing...while bush
allowed thievery for 8 years.


There is plenty of fraud over the last 15 years to go around.

agreed. but the efforts of the right to paint obama as thief in chief
is a LITTLE far fetched.

On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 18:11:33 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 17:49:24 -0400, bpuharic wrote:


agreed. but the efforts of the right to paint obama as thief in chief
is a LITTLE far fetched.

Obama is just the 5th Bush brother as far as the economy goes. (same
advisors, why would the policy change?)

IOW you have no idea why you say that...it's just something limball
listerners say. you have no solutions. only bitches.

typical right winger