On 09/04/2010 11:33 PM, wrote:

Is that $125k plus as some here say or is it less?

Depends on how you manage money. I have seen people live middle class
at $50k and others broke at $125K.

There is more to being middle class than what you make. It is also
about attitude and self dicipline.

--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 09/04/2010 11:33 PM, wrote:

Is that $125k plus as some here say or is it less?

Depends on how you manage money. I have seen people live middle class at
$50k and others broke at $125K.

There is more to being middle class than what you make. It is also about
attitude and self dicipline.

--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.


Good grief!!! I actually agree with you. Scary.

--
Nom=de=Plume

On 10/04/2010 11:29 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 09/04/2010 11:33 PM, wrote:

Is that $125k plus as some here say or is it less?

Depends on how you manage money. I have seen people live middle class at
$50k and others broke at $125K.

There is more to being middle class than what you make. It is also about
attitude and self dicipline.

--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.


Good grief!!! I actually agree with you. Scary.

Amazing.

--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.

On 10/04/2010 11:10 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 09:42:51 -0600,
wrote:

On 09/04/2010 11:33 PM, wrote:

Is that $125k plus as some here say or is it less?

Depends on how you manage money. I have seen people live middle class
at $50k and others broke at $125K.

There is more to being middle class than what you make. It is also
about attitude and self dicipline.

I agree with that. The most "broke" people I know make over $100k but
they spend borrowed money like they make a million.

Yep. My little sister is like that. When life was good with two good
jobs they leveraged up to the 9's. We told them, now is the time to
solidify that wealth and pay off debt, not create more of it.

Now getting close to 50, and a huge mortgage on a dump when the last
recession hit. Set her back 30 years financially. But it is all our
fault. Typical liberal screwup will be working for a long time yet.

--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.

On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 12:05:27 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:



Now getting close to 50, and a huge mortgage on a dump when the last
recession hit. Set her back 30 years financially. But it is all our
fault. Typical liberal screwup will be working for a long time yet.

guess the moron forgot:

right wingers blew out the US economy. alan greenspan...disciple of
ayn rand...george bush.

neither was liberal

conservatives can't handle reality

On 10/04/2010 12:45 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 12:05:27 -0600,
wrote:



Now getting close to 50, and a huge mortgage on a dump when the last
recession hit. Set her back 30 years financially. But it is all our
fault. Typical liberal screwup will be working for a long time yet.

guess the moron forgot:

right wingers blew out the US economy. alan greenspan...disciple of
ayn rand...george bush.

neither was liberal

conservatives can't handle reality

See if you can get this:

liberal - loose and free, few rules, can be anyone.

Liberal - calls themselves a liberal/left. Usually dimwit democrat or
LPC (Canada).

conservative - a philosophy of less risk and conservation. Can be anyone.

Conservative - calls themselves conservative/right, usually Republican
or Conservative.

Note the leading letter.

You can be a liberal Republican. And you can be a conservative
Democrat. But the norm is usually the reverse but not always.

Small "C" conservatives are like the pigs that built their homes with
bricks. Solid. Conserved resources conseravtively for years, they
suffer little in bad times.

Small "L" liberals, spend liberally in good times and get wiped out in
bad times because they were not conservatively planning, prefering to be
more liberal in spending.

Get with it. This is the english language.

--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 10/04/2010 12:45 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 12:05:27 -0600,
wrote:



Now getting close to 50, and a huge mortgage on a dump when the last
recession hit. Set her back 30 years financially. But it is all our
fault. Typical liberal screwup will be working for a long time yet.

guess the moron forgot:

right wingers blew out the US economy. alan greenspan...disciple of
ayn rand...george bush.

neither was liberal

conservatives can't handle reality

See if you can get this:

liberal - loose and free, few rules, can be anyone.

Liberal - calls themselves a liberal/left. Usually dimwit democrat or LPC
(Canada).

conservative - a philosophy of less risk and conservation. Can be anyone.

Conservative - calls themselves conservative/right, usually Republican or
Conservative.

Note the leading letter.

You can be a liberal Republican. And you can be a conservative Democrat.
But the norm is usually the reverse but not always.

Small "C" conservatives are like the pigs that built their homes with
bricks. Solid. Conserved resources conseravtively for years, they suffer
little in bad times.

Small "L" liberals, spend liberally in good times and get wiped out in bad
times because they were not conservatively planning, prefering to be more
liberal in spending.

Get with it. This is the english language.

--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.


Here's another C - Canuck. Definition: chucklehead.

--
Nom=de=Plume

On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:29:47 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 10/04/2010 12:45 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 12:05:27 -0600,
wrote:


conservatives can't handle reality

See if you can get this:

liberal - loose and free, few rules, can be anyone.

conservative: only the middle class has to obey rules

the rules are there to control them and deny them freedom.


Liberal - calls themselves a liberal/left. Usually dimwit democrat or
LPC (Canada).

conservatives: call themselves conservatives, not knowing it's an
oxymoron.


conservative - a philosophy of less risk and conservation. Can be anyone.

conservative: a philosophy of cowardice.




You can be a liberal Republican. And you can be a conservative
Democrat. But the norm is usually the reverse but not always.

Small "C" conservatives are like the pigs that built their homes with
bricks. Solid. Conserved resources conseravtively for years, they
suffer little in bad times.

really? if this is the case

then why did the conservative george bush have to raid the middle
class to save his rich, conservative pals?



Get with it. This is the english language.

let me know when you learn it.

On 10/04/2010 3:16 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:29:47 -0600,
wrote:

On 10/04/2010 12:45 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 12:05:27 -0600,
wrote:


conservatives can't handle reality

See if you can get this:

liberal - loose and free, few rules, can be anyone.

conservative: only the middle class has to obey rules

the rules are there to control them and deny them freedom.


Liberal - calls themselves a liberal/left. Usually dimwit democrat or
LPC (Canada).

conservatives: call themselves conservatives, not knowing it's an
oxymoron.


conservative - a philosophy of less risk and conservation. Can be anyone.

conservative: a philosophy of cowardice.




You can be a liberal Republican. And you can be a conservative
Democrat. But the norm is usually the reverse but not always.

Small "C" conservatives are like the pigs that built their homes with
bricks. Solid. Conserved resources conseravtively for years, they
suffer little in bad times.

really? if this is the case

then why did the conservative george bush have to raid the middle
class to save his rich, conservative pals?



Get with it. This is the english language.

let me know when you learn it.

Does not mater. With types like you, we know there will be lots of
squids to use.

--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.

On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 18:13:01 -0400, wrote:

On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:45:01 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

right wingers blew out the US economy. alan greenspan...disciple of
ayn rand...george bush.

With plenty of help from "the left"

really? the left was part of the chicago school?

gee. that's gonna come as news to everyone.


neither was liberal

Nor was Clinton, Greenspan worked for him, what's your point?

and clinton's govt was run by a conservative congress which ran
rampant with chicago school philosophy

you DO know about the chicago school, right?