On Apr 12, 2:26*pm, hk wrote:
On 4/12/10 2:24 PM, Frogwatch wrote:





On Apr 12, 12:47 pm, *wrote:
*wrote in message

....
On Apr 11, 1:51 pm, *wrote:

*wrote in message

....
On Apr 10, 9:13 pm, *wrote:

*wrote in message

m...

On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400,
wrote:

On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400,
wrote:

I'm still "out there doing real work.

I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days..

How are the pay and benefits?

Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I
do

Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill, I
will allow youto maintain that fantasy.

Men would be a lot smarter and happier if they stopped trying to win an
argument with a woman. It might be tactical, but it isn't strategic.

--
Nom=de=Plume-
Only because the woman is too stupid to realize that she's lost the
argument.

The next post will prove my point.

I guess you don't get laid that often, unless you pay cash of course.

--
Nom=de=Plume
Point proven, Jack.

Yeah, that you're a stalker.

--
Nom=de=Plume

I do not believe there are any women in this discussion, including Nom-
de-fraud

What? Loogy is a woman, and so are the packs of righties who hide behind
anonymous IDs.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

We'll see in a few weeks. Oh, and is your real name hk, lady?