On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400, hk
wrote:

I'm still "out there doing real work.

I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days.

How are the pay and benefits?

On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400,
wrote:

I'm still "out there doing real work.

I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days.

How are the pay and benefits?

Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I do,
w'hine.


--
http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400, hk
wrote:

On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400,
wrote:

I'm still "out there doing real work.

I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days.

How are the pay and benefits?

Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I do

Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill, I
will allow youto maintain that fantasy.

On 4/10/10 5:47 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400,
wrote:

On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400,
wrote:

I'm still "out there doing real work.

I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days.

How are the pay and benefits?

Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I do

Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill, I
will allow youto maintain that fantasy.


Get a job that does something for humanity, w'hine.

--
http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 18:14:10 -0400, hk
wrote:

Get a job that does something for humanity

Been there, done that, have the tee shirt, etc.

What have you done for humanity lately?

On 4/10/10 7:43 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 18:14:10 -0400,
wrote:

Get a job that does something for humanity

Been there, done that, have the tee shirt, etc.


Uh-huh.


What have you done for humanity lately?

It would blow you away, w'hine


--
http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400, hk
wrote:

On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400,
wrote:

I'm still "out there doing real work.

I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days.

How are the pay and benefits?

Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I do

Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill, I
will allow youto maintain that fantasy.


Men would be a lot smarter and happier if they stopped trying to win an
argument with a woman. It might be tactical, but it isn't strategic.

--
Nom=de=Plume

On Apr 10, 9:13*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Wayne.B" wrote in message

...





On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400, hk
wrote:

On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400,
wrote:

I'm still "out there doing real work.

I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days.

How are the pay and benefits?

Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I do

Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill, I
will allow youto maintain that fantasy.

Men would be a lot smarter and happier if they stopped trying to win an
argument with a woman. It might be tactical, but it isn't strategic.

--
Nom=de=Plume-

Only because the woman is too stupid to realize that she's lost the
argument.

The next post will prove my point.

"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Apr 10, 9:13 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Wayne.B" wrote in message

...





On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400, hk
wrote:

On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400,
wrote:

I'm still "out there doing real work.

I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days.

How are the pay and benefits?

Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I do

Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill, I
will allow youto maintain that fantasy.

Men would be a lot smarter and happier if they stopped trying to win an
argument with a woman. It might be tactical, but it isn't strategic.

--
Nom=de=Plume-

Only because the woman is too stupid to realize that she's lost the
argument.

The next post will prove my point.


I guess you don't get laid that often, unless you pay cash of course.

--
Nom=de=Plume

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Apr 10, 9:13 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Wayne.B" wrote in message

...





On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400, hk
wrote:

On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400,
wrote:

I'm still "out there doing real work.

I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days.

How are the pay and benefits?

Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I do

Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill, I
will allow youto maintain that fantasy.

Men would be a lot smarter and happier if they stopped trying to win an
argument with a woman. It might be tactical, but it isn't strategic.

--
Nom=de=Plume-

Only because the woman is too stupid to realize that she's lost the
argument.

The next post will prove my point.


I guess you don't get laid that often, unless you pay cash of course.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Is he paying the Palm Sisters now? They used to be satisfied with a good
quality lotion once in a while.