Cheekies?
 

On 09/04/2010 6:47 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 09/04/2010 5:36 PM, hk wrote:
On 4/9/10 7:16 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 09/04/2010 6:58 AM, hk wrote:
On 4/9/10 8:51 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 08/04/2010 6:42 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
On Apr 8, 5:40 pm, wrote:
On 08/04/2010 11:29 AM, Frogwatch wrote:

On Apr 8, 1:03 pm, wrote:
On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, wrote:

Well, I had not heard the term previously:

http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq

I approve.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad.

Every now and then, even HK makes sense.

Agreed.

Might fine looking women for sure.

--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.

What the hell was I supposed to have lied about? Typical irrational
female.

Didn't think you were lying at all. But females are an emotional
part of
the species.


Are you implying men are not emotional? If so, that is an absurdity.

Nope, just that the fair sex is generally more emotional.



Men and women are about equally emotional. Women, I believe, tend to be
more emotional about issues that matter - family, food, shelter,
relationships, schools, healthcare. Men tend to be emotional about
bull**** - machismo, warmongering, sports, cars, et cetera.

Don't get me wrong, it wasn't meant as a criticism at all. But a nice
balance is possible. Sometimes you need to be hard, sometimes you need to
be soft... working mariages both work together and listen to each others
concerns in earnest, then act as one.

Did you get this out of book or from the web? Sure doesn't sound like
something you came up with on your own.

Yep. Probably a little of both and meeting a good woman. You wouldn't
understand as you are the tyranical kind of wench needing handouts.

--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.

Cheekies?
 

On 09/04/2010 7:12 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
On Apr 9, 5:48 pm, wrote:
wrote in message

...



On 09/04/2010 12:33 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 08/04/2010 8:43 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 08/04/2010 11:48 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, wrote:
Well, I had not heard the term previously:

http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq

I approve.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad.

Heh... Are you saying one of those models is in your little black
book?
I
doubt it.

Men have such unrealistic views of women... never ceases to amaze me.
I
read
an interview with Cindy Crawford, and she said the "Cindy Crawford"
in
the
magazines doesn't look like Cindy Crawford (the person). It's mostly
airbrush, makeup, and lighting (with a healthy dose of good genes).

Took me a long time, but I found a sweet heart on the inside, smart
too.
Best thing, at 110 lbs she is a grandma and still looks better than
most
18 year olds. No implants, no makeup ether.

Rare find, I lucked out big time. Even likes boating and fishing.

Definitely lucky, given who you are.

It wasn't my first kick at the can. My first kick made me think quite a
bit differently in what it would take for me to go to the alter again.
The
second time, the criteria was quite high in all fronts as I was prepared
to be a devout single. It was a smart move in dumping my ex. BTW, I
don't
look at it as the exes fault, we both were too immature at the time.

Basically, you got dumped as soon as she figured it out.

Probably would still be single if not for meeting my wife. Happy I did,
but if she wasn't the best, I would have not taken a second run at it.

Men don't have to settle for second best and should not. Unless of
course
you are a liberal. Always look to the womans mother to see what she
will
be like after a batch of kids, mentally and physically.

Well, you're just such a manly man aren't you.

Hey, women want to put a collar around a mans neck called marriage. It
is
really a leash. So if your willing to do that better make sure she is
worth it as divorce is no fun.

Sure. Typical bs. You certainly had nothing to do with your own problems.
It's always someone else's fault.

Yep, got to meet her mom and that is when I knew I had quality fox.

Why do I get the impression that you're totally full of it...

Because you never met me. Not going to either.

I'm eternally grateful for this.

Mind you, on the flip someone like Tiger Woods should never get married.

Why not? Are you talking about some restriction you want to put on men's
freedom to act like a jackass?

So what is your story? Fat, unemployed, on the lamb... Grobbling for
free lunches on someone elses shirt tails?

We know for sure you are no "Cheekies"...
--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.

For sure. Yup... 500 lbs. and mean as a snake. You better be careful. I
might stomp you.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Life is too short to hang out with stupid women and if you do it seems
too long.

Isn't that the truth. We always talk about guys being ass holes, but it
is by no means limited to men. Get some high maintenance selfish bitch,
maybe hit and run if she looks good enough. But best to look for real
women with good attitudes. Life is too short to be stuck with a bitch.

--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.

Cheekies?
 

On 09/04/2010 8:00 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
On Apr 9, 6:51 pm, wrote:
On 4/9/10 9:47 PM, Jack wrote:



On Apr 9, 9:12 pm, wrote:
On Apr 9, 5:48 pm, wrote:

wrote in message

...

On 09/04/2010 12:33 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 08/04/2010 8:43 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 08/04/2010 11:48 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, wrote:
Well, I had not heard the term previously:

http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq

I approve.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad.

Heh... Are you saying one of those models is in your little black
book?
I
doubt it.

Men have such unrealistic views of women... never ceases to amaze me.
I
read
an interview with Cindy Crawford, and she said the "Cindy Crawford"
in
the
magazines doesn't look like Cindy Crawford (the person). It's mostly
airbrush, makeup, and lighting (with a healthy dose of good genes).

Took me a long time, but I found a sweet heart on the inside, smart
too.
Best thing, at 110 lbs she is a grandma and still looks better than
most
18 year olds. No implants, no makeup ether.

Rare find, I lucked out big time. Even likes boating and fishing.

Definitely lucky, given who you are.

It wasn't my first kick at the can. My first kick made me think quite a
bit differently in what it would take for me to go to the alter again.
The
second time, the criteria was quite high in all fronts as I was prepared
to be a devout single. It was a smart move in dumping my ex. BTW, I
don't
look at it as the exes fault, we both were too immature at the time.

Basically, you got dumped as soon as she figured it out.

Probably would still be single if not for meeting my wife. Happy I did,
but if she wasn't the best, I would have not taken a second run at it.

Men don't have to settle for second best and should not. Unless of
course
you are a liberal. Always look to the womans mother to see what she
will
be like after a batch of kids, mentally and physically.

Well, you're just such a manly man aren't you.

Hey, women want to put a collar around a mans neck called marriage. It
is
really a leash. So if your willing to do that better make sure she is
worth it as divorce is no fun.

Sure. Typical bs. You certainly had nothing to do with your own problems.
It's always someone else's fault.

Yep, got to meet her mom and that is when I knew I had quality fox.

Why do I get the impression that you're totally full of it...

Because you never met me. Not going to either.

I'm eternally grateful for this.

Mind you, on the flip someone like Tiger Woods should never get married.

Why not? Are you talking about some restriction you want to put on men's
freedom to act like a jackass?

So what is your story? Fat, unemployed, on the lamb... Grobbling for
free lunches on someone elses shirt tails?

We know for sure you are no "Cheekies"...
--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.

For sure. Yup... 500 lbs. and mean as a snake. You better be careful. I
might stomp you.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Life is too short to hang out with stupid women and if you do it seems
too long.

Heh. Exactly why most of us don't talk to the plum anymore.

You don't "talk" to Ms. Plume because she sees right through your
right-wing bull****.

Right-wing conservatives **** down the back of working men and women and
try to convince them it is rain.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

I do not believe nom-de-plum exists. "She" is actually somebody else
here.

Probably right there.

--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.

Cheekies?
 

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 09/04/2010 6:46 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Apr 9, 4:36 pm, wrote:
On 4/9/10 7:16 PM, Canuck57 wrote:



On 09/04/2010 6:58 AM, hk wrote:
On 4/9/10 8:51 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 08/04/2010 6:42 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
On Apr 8, 5:40 pm, wrote:
On 08/04/2010 11:29 AM, Frogwatch wrote:

On Apr 8, 1:03 pm, wrote:
On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, wrote:

Well, I had not heard the term previously:

http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq

I approve.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad.

Every now and then, even HK makes sense.

Agreed.

Might fine looking women for sure.

--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.

What the hell was I supposed to have lied about? Typical irrational
female.

Didn't think you were lying at all. But females are an emotional part
of
the species.

Are you implying men are not emotional? If so, that is an absurdity.

Nope, just that the fair sex is generally more emotional.

Men and women are about equally emotional. Women, I believe, tend to be
more emotional about issues that matter - family, food, shelter,
relationships, schools, healthcare. Men tend to be emotional about
bull**** - machismo, warmongering, sports, cars, et cetera.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

Why dont we just stick to describing female attributes we like, at
least it is a pleasant discussion then.


Like brains, intelligence, wit... oh wait, you might not like those
things.

I like brains and intelligence in a nice looking female, stimulating
actually. Guess that leaves you out on more than one account.

--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.


What amazes me is how some women marry beneath themselves... sort of like
your situation I guess.

FYI, you're the man not the woman.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Cheekies?
 

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 09/04/2010 6:47 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 09/04/2010 5:36 PM, hk wrote:
On 4/9/10 7:16 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 09/04/2010 6:58 AM, hk wrote:
On 4/9/10 8:51 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 08/04/2010 6:42 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
On Apr 8, 5:40 pm, wrote:
On 08/04/2010 11:29 AM, Frogwatch wrote:

On Apr 8, 1:03 pm, wrote:
On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, wrote:

Well, I had not heard the term previously:

http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq

I approve.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so
sad.

Every now and then, even HK makes sense.

Agreed.

Might fine looking women for sure.

--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.

What the hell was I supposed to have lied about? Typical irrational
female.

Didn't think you were lying at all. But females are an emotional
part of
the species.


Are you implying men are not emotional? If so, that is an absurdity.

Nope, just that the fair sex is generally more emotional.



Men and women are about equally emotional. Women, I believe, tend to be
more emotional about issues that matter - family, food, shelter,
relationships, schools, healthcare. Men tend to be emotional about
bull**** - machismo, warmongering, sports, cars, et cetera.

Don't get me wrong, it wasn't meant as a criticism at all. But a nice
balance is possible. Sometimes you need to be hard, sometimes you need
to
be soft... working mariages both work together and listen to each others
concerns in earnest, then act as one.

Did you get this out of book or from the web? Sure doesn't sound like
something you came up with on your own.

Yep. Probably a little of both and meeting a good woman. You wouldn't
understand as you are the tyranical kind of wench needing handouts.

--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.


I figured someone read it to you. Probably your wife.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Cheekies?
 

"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
On Apr 10, 12:01 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"hk" wrote in message

...



On 4/9/10 10:00 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
On Apr 9, 6:51 pm, wrote:
On 4/9/10 9:47 PM, Jack wrote:

On Apr 9, 9:12 pm, wrote:
On Apr 9, 5:48 pm, wrote:

wrote in message

...

On 09/04/2010 12:33 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
. ..
On 08/04/2010 8:43 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
d...
On 08/04/2010 11:48 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, wrote:
Well, I had not heard the term previously:

http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq

I approve.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so
sad.

Heh... Are you saying one of those models is in your little
black
book?
I
doubt it.

Men have such unrealistic views of women... never ceases to
amaze me.
I
read
an interview with Cindy Crawford, and she said the "Cindy
Crawford"
in
the
magazines doesn't look like Cindy Crawford (the person). It's
mostly
airbrush, makeup, and lighting (with a healthy dose of good
genes).

Took me a long time, but I found a sweet heart on the inside,
smart
too.
Best thing, at 110 lbs she is a grandma and still looks better
than
most
18 year olds. No implants, no makeup ether.

Rare find, I lucked out big time. Even likes boating and
fishing.

Definitely lucky, given who you are.

It wasn't my first kick at the can. My first kick made me think
quite a
bit differently in what it would take for me to go to the alter
again.
The
second time, the criteria was quite high in all fronts as I was
prepared
to be a devout single. It was a smart move in dumping my ex.
BTW,
I
don't
look at it as the exes fault, we both were too immature at the
time.

Basically, you got dumped as soon as she figured it out.

Probably would still be single if not for meeting my wife. Happy
I did,
but if she wasn't the best, I would have not taken a second run
at
it.

Men don't have to settle for second best and should not.
Unless
of
course
you are a liberal. Always look to the womans mother to see
what
she
will
be like after a batch of kids, mentally and physically.

Well, you're just such a manly man aren't you.

Hey, women want to put a collar around a mans neck called
marriage. It
is
really a leash. So if your willing to do that better make sure
she is
worth it as divorce is no fun.

Sure. Typical bs. You certainly had nothing to do with your own
problems.
It's always someone else's fault.

Yep, got to meet her mom and that is when I knew I had quality
fox.

Why do I get the impression that you're totally full of it...

Because you never met me. Not going to either.

I'm eternally grateful for this.

Mind you, on the flip someone like Tiger Woods should never get
married.

Why not? Are you talking about some restriction you want to put
on
men's
freedom to act like a jackass?

So what is your story? Fat, unemployed, on the lamb... Grobbling
for
free lunches on someone elses shirt tails?

We know for sure you are no "Cheekies"...
--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.

For sure. Yup... 500 lbs. and mean as a snake. You better be
careful.
I
might stomp you.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Life is too short to hang out with stupid women and if you do it
seems
too long.

Heh. Exactly why most of us don't talk to the plum anymore.

You don't "talk" to Ms. Plume because she sees right through your
right-wing bull****.

Right-wing conservatives **** down the back of working men and women
and
try to convince them it is rain.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

I do not believe nom-de-plum exists. "She" is actually somebody else
here.

You mean, like "anon," "larry," "swtom," "loogy," and their id spoofing
doppelgangers?

--
http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

I'm supposed to be you I think, despite the different timezones, posting
habits, etc... Frogette is just an idiot. He can't really hide.

--
Nom=de=Plume

However, he tends to make boating posts which you immediately insult
him and wish to trash his threads, D'Plume. And why is that?

I really don't think he's trying to "hide" from anyone. Many know who
he is and I'm sure they know his location too; at home or sailing.

Lets see who is hiding.

What's your true name and address, D'Plume?


Reply: And, you're a liar. No, I'm not giving you my address. Name is, as
I've said, Em. If you can't handle it, feel free to stop reading my posts.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Cheekies?
 

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 09/04/2010 8:00 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
On Apr 9, 6:51 pm, wrote:
On 4/9/10 9:47 PM, Jack wrote:



On Apr 9, 9:12 pm, wrote:
On Apr 9, 5:48 pm, wrote:

wrote in message

...

On 09/04/2010 12:33 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 08/04/2010 8:43 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 08/04/2010 11:48 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, wrote:
Well, I had not heard the term previously:

http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq

I approve.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so
sad.

Heh... Are you saying one of those models is in your little
black
book?
I
doubt it.

Men have such unrealistic views of women... never ceases to
amaze me.
I
read
an interview with Cindy Crawford, and she said the "Cindy
Crawford"
in
the
magazines doesn't look like Cindy Crawford (the person). It's
mostly
airbrush, makeup, and lighting (with a healthy dose of good
genes).

Took me a long time, but I found a sweet heart on the inside,
smart
too.
Best thing, at 110 lbs she is a grandma and still looks better
than
most
18 year olds. No implants, no makeup ether.

Rare find, I lucked out big time. Even likes boating and
fishing.

Definitely lucky, given who you are.

It wasn't my first kick at the can. My first kick made me think
quite a
bit differently in what it would take for me to go to the alter
again.
The
second time, the criteria was quite high in all fronts as I was
prepared
to be a devout single. It was a smart move in dumping my ex. BTW,
I
don't
look at it as the exes fault, we both were too immature at the
time.

Basically, you got dumped as soon as she figured it out.

Probably would still be single if not for meeting my wife. Happy
I did,
but if she wasn't the best, I would have not taken a second run at
it.

Men don't have to settle for second best and should not. Unless
of
course
you are a liberal. Always look to the womans mother to see what
she
will
be like after a batch of kids, mentally and physically.

Well, you're just such a manly man aren't you.

Hey, women want to put a collar around a mans neck called
marriage. It
is
really a leash. So if your willing to do that better make sure
she is
worth it as divorce is no fun.

Sure. Typical bs. You certainly had nothing to do with your own
problems.
It's always someone else's fault.

Yep, got to meet her mom and that is when I knew I had quality
fox.

Why do I get the impression that you're totally full of it...

Because you never met me. Not going to either.

I'm eternally grateful for this.

Mind you, on the flip someone like Tiger Woods should never get
married.

Why not? Are you talking about some restriction you want to put on
men's
freedom to act like a jackass?

So what is your story? Fat, unemployed, on the lamb... Grobbling
for
free lunches on someone elses shirt tails?

We know for sure you are no "Cheekies"...
--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.

For sure. Yup... 500 lbs. and mean as a snake. You better be careful.
I
might stomp you.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Life is too short to hang out with stupid women and if you do it seems
too long.

Heh. Exactly why most of us don't talk to the plum anymore.

You don't "talk" to Ms. Plume because she sees right through your
right-wing bull****.

Right-wing conservatives **** down the back of working men and women and
try to convince them it is rain.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

I do not believe nom-de-plum exists. "She" is actually somebody else
here.

Probably right there.

--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.


That's right!! A ghost is typing. Try again nucknuck.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Cheekies?
 

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 09/04/2010 7:12 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
On Apr 9, 5:48 pm, wrote:
wrote in message

...



On 09/04/2010 12:33 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 08/04/2010 8:43 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 08/04/2010 11:48 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, wrote:
Well, I had not heard the term previously:

http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq

I approve.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad.

Heh... Are you saying one of those models is in your little black
book?
I
doubt it.

Men have such unrealistic views of women... never ceases to amaze
me.
I
read
an interview with Cindy Crawford, and she said the "Cindy
Crawford"
in
the
magazines doesn't look like Cindy Crawford (the person). It's
mostly
airbrush, makeup, and lighting (with a healthy dose of good
genes).

Took me a long time, but I found a sweet heart on the inside, smart
too.
Best thing, at 110 lbs she is a grandma and still looks better than
most
18 year olds. No implants, no makeup ether.

Rare find, I lucked out big time. Even likes boating and fishing.

Definitely lucky, given who you are.

It wasn't my first kick at the can. My first kick made me think
quite a
bit differently in what it would take for me to go to the alter
again.
The
second time, the criteria was quite high in all fronts as I was
prepared
to be a devout single. It was a smart move in dumping my ex. BTW, I
don't
look at it as the exes fault, we both were too immature at the time.

Basically, you got dumped as soon as she figured it out.

Probably would still be single if not for meeting my wife. Happy I
did,
but if she wasn't the best, I would have not taken a second run at
it.

Men don't have to settle for second best and should not. Unless of
course
you are a liberal. Always look to the womans mother to see what
she
will
be like after a batch of kids, mentally and physically.

Well, you're just such a manly man aren't you.

Hey, women want to put a collar around a mans neck called marriage.
It
is
really a leash. So if your willing to do that better make sure she
is
worth it as divorce is no fun.

Sure. Typical bs. You certainly had nothing to do with your own
problems.
It's always someone else's fault.

Yep, got to meet her mom and that is when I knew I had quality fox.

Why do I get the impression that you're totally full of it...

Because you never met me. Not going to either.

I'm eternally grateful for this.

Mind you, on the flip someone like Tiger Woods should never get
married.

Why not? Are you talking about some restriction you want to put on
men's
freedom to act like a jackass?

So what is your story? Fat, unemployed, on the lamb... Grobbling for
free lunches on someone elses shirt tails?

We know for sure you are no "Cheekies"...
--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.

For sure. Yup... 500 lbs. and mean as a snake. You better be careful. I
might stomp you.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Life is too short to hang out with stupid women and if you do it seems
too long.

Isn't that the truth. We always talk about guys being ass holes, but it
is by no means limited to men. Get some high maintenance selfish bitch,
maybe hit and run if she looks good enough. But best to look for real
women with good attitudes. Life is too short to be stuck with a bitch.

--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.


Poor baby. I guess you'll just have to suffer through it like you do with
other aspects of your life.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Cheekies?
 

On Apr 10, 10:25*am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Canuck57" wrote in message

...



On 09/04/2010 7:12 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
On Apr 9, 5:48 pm, *wrote:
*wrote in message

...

On 09/04/2010 12:33 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
* *wrote in message
...
On 08/04/2010 8:43 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
* * wrote in message
.. .
On 08/04/2010 11:48 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
* * *wrote in message
...
On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, * * *wrote:
Well, I had not heard the term previously:

http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq

I approve.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad.

Heh... Are you saying one of those models is in your little black
book?
I
doubt it.

Men have such unrealistic views of women... never ceases to amaze
me.
I
read
an interview with Cindy Crawford, and she said the "Cindy
Crawford"
in
the
magazines doesn't look like Cindy Crawford (the person). It's
mostly
airbrush, makeup, and lighting (with a healthy dose of good
genes).

Took me a long time, but I found a sweet heart on the inside, smart
too.
Best thing, at 110 lbs she is a grandma and still looks better than
most
18 year olds. *No implants, no makeup ether.

Rare find, I lucked out big time. *Even likes boating and fishing.

Definitely lucky, given who you are.

It wasn't my first kick at the can. *My first kick made me think
quite a
bit differently in what it would take for me to go to the alter
again.
The
second time, the criteria was quite high in all fronts as I was
prepared
to be a devout single. *It was a smart move in dumping my ex. BTW, I
don't
look at it as the exes fault, we both were too immature at the time.

Basically, you got dumped as soon as she figured it out.

Probably would still be single if not for meeting my wife. *Happy I
did,
but if she wasn't the best, I would have not taken a second run at
it.

Men don't have to settle for second best and should not. *Unless of
course
you are a liberal. *Always look to the womans mother to see what
she
will
be like after a batch of kids, mentally and physically.

Well, you're just such a manly man aren't *you.

Hey, women want to put a collar around a mans neck called marriage..
It
is
really a leash. *So if your willing to do that better make sure she
is
worth it as divorce is no fun.

Sure. Typical bs. You certainly had nothing to do with your own
problems.
It's always someone else's fault.

Yep, got to meet her mom and that is when I knew I had quality fox.

Why do I get the impression that you're totally full of it...

Because you never met me. *Not going to either.

I'm eternally grateful for this.

Mind you, on the flip someone like Tiger Woods should never get
married.

Why not? Are you talking about some restriction you want to put on
men's
freedom to act like a jackass?

So what is your story? *Fat, unemployed, on the lamb... *Grobbling for
free lunches on someone elses shirt tails?

We know for sure you are no "Cheekies"...
--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.

For sure. Yup... 500 lbs. and mean as a snake. You better be careful. I
might stomp you.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Life is too short to hang out with stupid women and if you do it seems
too long.

Isn't that the truth. *We always talk about guys being ass holes, but it
is by no means limited to men. *Get some high maintenance selfish bitch,
maybe hit and run if she looks good enough. *But best to look for real
women with good attitudes. *Life is too short to be stuck with a bitch.

--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.

Poor baby. I guess you'll just have to suffer through it like you do with
other aspects of your life.

--
Nom=de=Plume

There is no evidence that nom does any boating. "She" is simply
another mouthpiece for a certain leftie here.

Cheekies?
 

"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On Apr 10, 10:25 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Canuck57" wrote in message

...



On 09/04/2010 7:12 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
On Apr 9, 5:48 pm, wrote:
wrote in message

...

On 09/04/2010 12:33 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 08/04/2010 8:43 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
.. .
On 08/04/2010 11:48 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, wrote:
Well, I had not heard the term previously:

http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq

I approve.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so
sad.

Heh... Are you saying one of those models is in your little
black
book?
I
doubt it.

Men have such unrealistic views of women... never ceases to
amaze
me.
I
read
an interview with Cindy Crawford, and she said the "Cindy
Crawford"
in
the
magazines doesn't look like Cindy Crawford (the person). It's
mostly
airbrush, makeup, and lighting (with a healthy dose of good
genes).

Took me a long time, but I found a sweet heart on the inside,
smart
too.
Best thing, at 110 lbs she is a grandma and still looks better
than
most
18 year olds. No implants, no makeup ether.

Rare find, I lucked out big time. Even likes boating and fishing.

Definitely lucky, given who you are.

It wasn't my first kick at the can. My first kick made me think
quite a
bit differently in what it would take for me to go to the alter
again.
The
second time, the criteria was quite high in all fronts as I was
prepared
to be a devout single. It was a smart move in dumping my ex. BTW, I
don't
look at it as the exes fault, we both were too immature at the
time.

Basically, you got dumped as soon as she figured it out.

Probably would still be single if not for meeting my wife. Happy I
did,
but if she wasn't the best, I would have not taken a second run at
it.

Men don't have to settle for second best and should not. Unless
of
course
you are a liberal. Always look to the womans mother to see what
she
will
be like after a batch of kids, mentally and physically.

Well, you're just such a manly man aren't you.

Hey, women want to put a collar around a mans neck called marriage.
It
is
really a leash. So if your willing to do that better make sure she
is
worth it as divorce is no fun.

Sure. Typical bs. You certainly had nothing to do with your own
problems.
It's always someone else's fault.

Yep, got to meet her mom and that is when I knew I had quality
fox.

Why do I get the impression that you're totally full of it...

Because you never met me. Not going to either.

I'm eternally grateful for this.

Mind you, on the flip someone like Tiger Woods should never get
married.

Why not? Are you talking about some restriction you want to put on
men's
freedom to act like a jackass?

So what is your story? Fat, unemployed, on the lamb... Grobbling for
free lunches on someone elses shirt tails?

We know for sure you are no "Cheekies"...
--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.

For sure. Yup... 500 lbs. and mean as a snake. You better be careful.
I
might stomp you.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Life is too short to hang out with stupid women and if you do it seems
too long.

Isn't that the truth. We always talk about guys being ass holes, but it
is by no means limited to men. Get some high maintenance selfish bitch,
maybe hit and run if she looks good enough. But best to look for real
women with good attitudes. Life is too short to be stuck with a bitch.

--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.

Poor baby. I guess you'll just have to suffer through it like you do with
other aspects of your life.

--
Nom=de=Plume

There is no evidence that nom does any boating. "She" is simply
another mouthpiece for a certain leftie here.


Wow... bummer for you. Why don't you tell me I'm fat and ugly if that makes
you feel like more of a man.

--
Nom=de=Plume