Cheekies?
 

On 4/9/10 7:16 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 09/04/2010 6:58 AM, hk wrote:
On 4/9/10 8:51 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 08/04/2010 6:42 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
On Apr 8, 5:40 pm, wrote:
On 08/04/2010 11:29 AM, Frogwatch wrote:

On Apr 8, 1:03 pm, wrote:
On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, wrote:

Well, I had not heard the term previously:

http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq

I approve.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad.

Every now and then, even HK makes sense.

Agreed.

Might fine looking women for sure.

--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.

What the hell was I supposed to have lied about? Typical irrational
female.

Didn't think you were lying at all. But females are an emotional part of
the species.


Are you implying men are not emotional? If so, that is an absurdity.

Nope, just that the fair sex is generally more emotional.



Men and women are about equally emotional. Women, I believe, tend to be
more emotional about issues that matter - family, food, shelter,
relationships, schools, healthcare. Men tend to be emotional about
bull**** - machismo, warmongering, sports, cars, et cetera.

--
http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

Cheekies?
 

On Apr 9, 4:36*pm, hk wrote:
On 4/9/10 7:16 PM, Canuck57 wrote:



On 09/04/2010 6:58 AM, hk wrote:
On 4/9/10 8:51 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 08/04/2010 6:42 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
On Apr 8, 5:40 pm, wrote:
On 08/04/2010 11:29 AM, Frogwatch wrote:

On Apr 8, 1:03 pm, wrote:
On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, wrote:

Well, I had not heard the term previously:

http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq

I approve.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad.

Every now and then, even HK makes sense.

Agreed.

Might fine looking women for sure.

--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.

What the hell was I supposed to have lied about? Typical irrational
female.

Didn't think you were lying at all. But females are an emotional part of
the species.

Are you implying men are not emotional? If so, that is an absurdity.

Nope, just that the fair sex is generally more emotional.

Men and women are about equally emotional. Women, I believe, tend to be
more emotional about issues that matter - family, food, shelter,
relationships, schools, healthcare. Men tend to be emotional about
bull**** - machismo, warmongering, sports, cars, et cetera.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

Why dont we just stick to describing female attributes we like, at
least it is a pleasant discussion then.

Cheekies?
 

"hk" wrote in message
...
On 4/9/10 7:16 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 09/04/2010 6:58 AM, hk wrote:
On 4/9/10 8:51 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 08/04/2010 6:42 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
On Apr 8, 5:40 pm, wrote:
On 08/04/2010 11:29 AM, Frogwatch wrote:

On Apr 8, 1:03 pm, wrote:
On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, wrote:

Well, I had not heard the term previously:

http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq

I approve.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad.

Every now and then, even HK makes sense.

Agreed.

Might fine looking women for sure.

--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.

What the hell was I supposed to have lied about? Typical irrational
female.

Didn't think you were lying at all. But females are an emotional part
of
the species.


Are you implying men are not emotional? If so, that is an absurdity.

Nope, just that the fair sex is generally more emotional.



Men and women are about equally emotional. Women, I believe, tend to be
more emotional about issues that matter - family, food, shelter,
relationships, schools, healthcare. Men tend to be emotional about
bull**** - machismo, warmongering, sports, cars, et cetera.

--

...and in Looneys case...moonshine & chawin' tobacco

Cheekies?
 

nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...

Loogypicker wrote:

On Apr 8, 1:48 pm, wrote:


wrote in message

...
On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, wrote:



Well, I had not heard the term previously:



http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq



I approve.



--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym
More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad.


Heh... Are you saying one of those models is in your little black book?
I
doubt it.

Men have such unrealistic views of women... never ceases to amaze me. I
read
an interview with Cindy Crawford, and she said the "Cindy Crawford" in
the
magazines doesn't look like Cindy Crawford (the person). It's mostly
airbrush, makeup, and lighting (with a healthy dose of good genes).

--
Nom=de=Plume


How in hell did my reply make you think that I was saying anything at
all about me???


It's one of her signature diversion moves. Obvious as hell but it makes
her happy.


You're obviously a blowhard with no semblence of intelligence.


Obviously...

Cheekies?
 

On 09/04/2010 5:36 PM, hk wrote:
On 4/9/10 7:16 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 09/04/2010 6:58 AM, hk wrote:
On 4/9/10 8:51 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 08/04/2010 6:42 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
On Apr 8, 5:40 pm, wrote:
On 08/04/2010 11:29 AM, Frogwatch wrote:

On Apr 8, 1:03 pm, wrote:
On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, wrote:

Well, I had not heard the term previously:

http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq

I approve.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad.

Every now and then, even HK makes sense.

Agreed.

Might fine looking women for sure.

--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.

What the hell was I supposed to have lied about? Typical irrational
female.

Didn't think you were lying at all. But females are an emotional
part of
the species.


Are you implying men are not emotional? If so, that is an absurdity.

Nope, just that the fair sex is generally more emotional.



Men and women are about equally emotional. Women, I believe, tend to be
more emotional about issues that matter - family, food, shelter,
relationships, schools, healthcare. Men tend to be emotional about
bull**** - machismo, warmongering, sports, cars, et cetera.

Don't get me wrong, it wasn't meant as a criticism at all. But a nice
balance is possible. Sometimes you need to be hard, sometimes you need
to be soft... working mariages both work together and listen to each
others concerns in earnest, then act as one.

--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.

Cheekies?
 

Don White wrote:
wrote in message
...

wrote in message
...

Loogypicker wrote:

On Apr 8, 1:48 pm, wrote:


wrote in message

...
On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, wrote:



Well, I had not heard the term previously:



http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq



I approve.



--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym
More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad.


Heh... Are you saying one of those models is in your little black book?
I
doubt it.

Men have such unrealistic views of women... never ceases to amaze me. I
read
an interview with Cindy Crawford, and she said the "Cindy Crawford" in
the
magazines doesn't look like Cindy Crawford (the person). It's mostly
airbrush, makeup, and lighting (with a healthy dose of good genes).

--
Nom=de=Plume


How in hell did my reply make you think that I was saying anything at
all about me???


It's one of her signature diversion moves. Obvious as hell but it makes
her happy.


You're obviously a blowhard with no semblence of intelligence.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Yup...that's our Ditzy Dan!



Your Ditzy Dan? How are those Molson's going down, Don?

Cheekies?
 

"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On Apr 9, 4:36 pm, hk wrote:
On 4/9/10 7:16 PM, Canuck57 wrote:



On 09/04/2010 6:58 AM, hk wrote:
On 4/9/10 8:51 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 08/04/2010 6:42 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
On Apr 8, 5:40 pm, wrote:
On 08/04/2010 11:29 AM, Frogwatch wrote:

On Apr 8, 1:03 pm, wrote:
On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, wrote:

Well, I had not heard the term previously:

http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq

I approve.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad.

Every now and then, even HK makes sense.

Agreed.

Might fine looking women for sure.

--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.

What the hell was I supposed to have lied about? Typical irrational
female.

Didn't think you were lying at all. But females are an emotional part
of
the species.

Are you implying men are not emotional? If so, that is an absurdity.

Nope, just that the fair sex is generally more emotional.

Men and women are about equally emotional. Women, I believe, tend to be
more emotional about issues that matter - family, food, shelter,
relationships, schools, healthcare. Men tend to be emotional about
bull**** - machismo, warmongering, sports, cars, et cetera.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

Why dont we just stick to describing female attributes we like, at
least it is a pleasant discussion then.


Like brains, intelligence, wit... oh wait, you might not like those things.
--
Nom=de=Plume

Cheekies?
 

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 09/04/2010 5:36 PM, hk wrote:
On 4/9/10 7:16 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 09/04/2010 6:58 AM, hk wrote:
On 4/9/10 8:51 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 08/04/2010 6:42 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
On Apr 8, 5:40 pm, wrote:
On 08/04/2010 11:29 AM, Frogwatch wrote:

On Apr 8, 1:03 pm, wrote:
On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, wrote:

Well, I had not heard the term previously:

http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq

I approve.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad.

Every now and then, even HK makes sense.

Agreed.

Might fine looking women for sure.

--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.

What the hell was I supposed to have lied about? Typical irrational
female.

Didn't think you were lying at all. But females are an emotional
part of
the species.


Are you implying men are not emotional? If so, that is an absurdity.

Nope, just that the fair sex is generally more emotional.



Men and women are about equally emotional. Women, I believe, tend to be
more emotional about issues that matter - family, food, shelter,
relationships, schools, healthcare. Men tend to be emotional about
bull**** - machismo, warmongering, sports, cars, et cetera.

Don't get me wrong, it wasn't meant as a criticism at all. But a nice
balance is possible. Sometimes you need to be hard, sometimes you need to
be soft... working mariages both work together and listen to each others
concerns in earnest, then act as one.

--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.


Did you get this out of book or from the web? Sure doesn't sound like
something you came up with on your own.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Cheekies?
 

"Larry" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...

Loogypicker wrote:

On Apr 8, 1:48 pm, wrote:


wrote in message

...
On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, wrote:



Well, I had not heard the term previously:



http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq



I approve.



--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym
More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad.


Heh... Are you saying one of those models is in your little black
book?
I
doubt it.

Men have such unrealistic views of women... never ceases to amaze me.
I
read
an interview with Cindy Crawford, and she said the "Cindy Crawford" in
the
magazines doesn't look like Cindy Crawford (the person). It's mostly
airbrush, makeup, and lighting (with a healthy dose of good genes).

--
Nom=de=Plume


How in hell did my reply make you think that I was saying anything at
all about me???


It's one of her signature diversion moves. Obvious as hell but it makes
her happy.


You're obviously a blowhard with no semblence of intelligence.


Obviously...


Thanks for confirming my thoughts.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Cheekies?
 

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 09/04/2010 12:33 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 08/04/2010 8:43 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 08/04/2010 11:48 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, wrote:
Well, I had not heard the term previously:

http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq

I approve.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad.


Heh... Are you saying one of those models is in your little black
book?
I
doubt it.

Men have such unrealistic views of women... never ceases to amaze me.
I
read
an interview with Cindy Crawford, and she said the "Cindy Crawford"
in
the
magazines doesn't look like Cindy Crawford (the person). It's mostly
airbrush, makeup, and lighting (with a healthy dose of good genes).

Took me a long time, but I found a sweet heart on the inside, smart
too.
Best thing, at 110 lbs she is a grandma and still looks better than
most
18 year olds. No implants, no makeup ether.

Rare find, I lucked out big time. Even likes boating and fishing.

Definitely lucky, given who you are.

It wasn't my first kick at the can. My first kick made me think quite a
bit differently in what it would take for me to go to the alter again.
The
second time, the criteria was quite high in all fronts as I was prepared
to be a devout single. It was a smart move in dumping my ex. BTW, I
don't
look at it as the exes fault, we both were too immature at the time.

Basically, you got dumped as soon as she figured it out.

Probably would still be single if not for meeting my wife. Happy I did,
but if she wasn't the best, I would have not taken a second run at it.

Men don't have to settle for second best and should not. Unless of
course
you are a liberal. Always look to the womans mother to see what she
will
be like after a batch of kids, mentally and physically.

Well, you're just such a manly man aren't you.

Hey, women want to put a collar around a mans neck called marriage. It
is
really a leash. So if your willing to do that better make sure she is
worth it as divorce is no fun.

Sure. Typical bs. You certainly had nothing to do with your own problems.
It's always someone else's fault.


Yep, got to meet her mom and that is when I knew I had quality fox.

Why do I get the impression that you're totally full of it...

Because you never met me. Not going to either.

I'm eternally grateful for this.


Mind you, on the flip someone like Tiger Woods should never get married.

Why not? Are you talking about some restriction you want to put on men's
freedom to act like a jackass?


So what is your story? Fat, unemployed, on the lamb... Grobbling for
free lunches on someone elses shirt tails?

We know for sure you are no "Cheekies"...
--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.


For sure. Yup... 500 lbs. and mean as a snake. You better be careful. I
might stomp you.

--
Nom=de=Plume