| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Cheekies?
Well, I had not heard the term previously: http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq I approve. -- http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym |
Cheekies?
On Apr 8, 12:21*pm, hk wrote:
Well, I had not heard the term previously: http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq I approve. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad. |
Cheekies?
On Apr 8, 1:03*pm, Loogypicker wrote:
On Apr 8, 12:21*pm, hk wrote: Well, I had not heard the term previously: http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq I approve. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad. Every now and then, even HK makes sense. |
Cheekies?
On 4/8/10 1:29 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
On Apr 8, 1:03 pm, wrote: On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, wrote: Well, I had not heard the term previously: http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq I approve. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad. Every now and then, even HK makes sense. Loogy prefers boy butts. Just look at his relationship with SnottyScotty. -- http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym |
Cheekies?
"Loogypicker" wrote in message
... On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, hk wrote: Well, I had not heard the term previously: http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq I approve. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad. Heh... Are you saying one of those models is in your little black book? I doubt it. Men have such unrealistic views of women... never ceases to amaze me. I read an interview with Cindy Crawford, and she said the "Cindy Crawford" in the magazines doesn't look like Cindy Crawford (the person). It's mostly airbrush, makeup, and lighting (with a healthy dose of good genes). -- Nom=de=Plume |
Cheekies?
On Apr 8, 1:37*pm, hk wrote:
On 4/8/10 1:29 PM, Frogwatch wrote: On Apr 8, 1:03 pm, *wrote: On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, *wrote: Well, I had not heard the term previously: http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq I approve. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad. Every now and then, even HK makes sense. Loogy prefers boy butts. Just look at his relationship with SnottyScotty. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym Tell the group, one more time, just what you know about me.....OH, nothing. It's all lies, just like your miserable life. |
Cheekies?
On Apr 8, 1:48*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Loogypicker" wrote in message ... On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, hk wrote: Well, I had not heard the term previously: http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq I approve. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad. Heh... Are you saying one of those models is in your little black book? I doubt it. Men have such unrealistic views of women... never ceases to amaze me. I read an interview with Cindy Crawford, and she said the "Cindy Crawford" in the magazines doesn't look like Cindy Crawford (the person). It's mostly airbrush, makeup, and lighting (with a healthy dose of good genes). -- Nom=de=Plume How in hell did my reply make you think that I was saying anything at all about me??? |
Cheekies?
On 4/8/10 1:48 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message ... On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, wrote: Well, I had not heard the term previously: http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq I approve. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad. Heh... Are you saying one of those models is in your little black book? I doubt it. Men have such unrealistic views of women... never ceases to amaze me. I read an interview with Cindy Crawford, and she said the "Cindy Crawford" in the magazines doesn't look like Cindy Crawford (the person). It's mostly airbrush, makeup, and lighting (with a healthy dose of good genes). I dunno...my guess is the Vickie' Secret models are starting out with a lot of the right stuff. :) Real males are genetically encoded to admire women who meet their preferred beauty standards. :) -- http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym |
Cheekies?
On 4/8/10 1:52 PM, Loogypicker wrote:
On Apr 8, 1:37 pm, wrote: On 4/8/10 1:29 PM, Frogwatch wrote: On Apr 8, 1:03 pm, wrote: On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, wrote: Well, I had not heard the term previously: http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq I approve. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad. Every now and then, even HK makes sense. Loogy prefers boy butts. Just look at his relationship with SnottyScotty. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym Tell the group, one more time, just what you know about me.....OH, nothing. It's all lies, just like your miserable life. I agree, Loogy...I know nothing about you beyond what you post here. Which is why your imaginary legal action is going to go...nowhere. You're nothing more than a cowardly little twerp who hide behind a screen name. There's no evidence here that you are anything else... -- http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym |
Cheekies?
On 4/8/10 1:53 PM, Loogypicker wrote:
On Apr 8, 1:48 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, wrote: Well, I had not heard the term previously: http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq I approve. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad. Heh... Are you saying one of those models is in your little black book? I doubt it. Men have such unrealistic views of women... never ceases to amaze me. I read an interview with Cindy Crawford, and she said the "Cindy Crawford" in the magazines doesn't look like Cindy Crawford (the person). It's mostly airbrush, makeup, and lighting (with a healthy dose of good genes). -- Nom=de=Plume How in hell did my reply make you think that I was saying anything at all about me??? Whoosh! You're so stupid you didn't get it. What a surprise. -- http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym |
Cheekies?
On Apr 8, 1:57*pm, hk wrote:
On 4/8/10 1:52 PM, Loogypicker wrote: On Apr 8, 1:37 pm, *wrote: On 4/8/10 1:29 PM, Frogwatch wrote: On Apr 8, 1:03 pm, * *wrote: On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, * *wrote: Well, I had not heard the term previously: http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq I approve. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad. Every now and then, even HK makes sense. Loogy prefers boy butts. Just look at his relationship with SnottyScotty. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym Tell the group, one more time, just what you know about me.....OH, nothing. It's all lies, just like your miserable life. I agree, Loogy...I know nothing about you beyond what you post here. Which is why your imaginary legal action is going to go...nowhere. It's moving along nicely...... You're nothing more than a cowardly little twerp who hide behind a screen name. There's no evidence here that you are anything else... This from the pussy who's so afraid of me that he's going to answer his door with a gun drawn BWAAAHAAA!!! |
Cheekies?
On Apr 8, 1:58*pm, hk wrote:
On 4/8/10 1:53 PM, Loogypicker wrote: On Apr 8, 1:48 pm, *wrote: *wrote in message .... On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, *wrote: Well, I had not heard the term previously: http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq I approve. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad. Heh... Are you saying one of those models is in your little black book? I doubt it. Men have such unrealistic views of women... never ceases to amaze me. I read an interview with Cindy Crawford, and she said the "Cindy Crawford" in the magazines doesn't look like Cindy Crawford (the person). It's mostly airbrush, makeup, and lighting (with a healthy dose of good genes). -- Nom=de=Plume How in hell did my reply make you think that I was saying anything at all about me??? Whoosh! You're so stupid you didn't get it. What a surprise. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Pssst, dummy, did you notice that she directed the statement at ME??? Hence, she's implying that I somehow was saying something about (drumroll please) ME. I wasn't. It was a simple comment about your obsession with things you can't have. Anyone with any sense can see by your utter disdain for anyone that has things that you can't have, and by your lies about things that you claim to have or have done that you have this mental problem. |
Cheekies?
On 4/8/10 2:17 PM, Loogypicker wrote:
On Apr 8, 1:57 pm, wrote: On 4/8/10 1:52 PM, Loogypicker wrote: On Apr 8, 1:37 pm, wrote: On 4/8/10 1:29 PM, Frogwatch wrote: On Apr 8, 1:03 pm, wrote: On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, wrote: Well, I had not heard the term previously: http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq I approve. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad. Every now and then, even HK makes sense. Loogy prefers boy butts. Just look at his relationship with SnottyScotty. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym Tell the group, one more time, just what you know about me.....OH, nothing. It's all lies, just like your miserable life. I agree, Loogy...I know nothing about you beyond what you post here. Which is why your imaginary legal action is going to go...nowhere. It's moving along nicely...... You're nothing more than a cowardly little twerp who hide behind a screen name. There's no evidence here that you are anything else... This from the pussy who's so afraid of me that he's going to answer his door with a gun drawn BWAAAHAAA!!! Since I wouldn't recognize you in a police lineup, Loogy, why do you think I would open the door for you with a drawn firearm? -- http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym |
Cheekies?
On 4/8/10 2:19 PM, Loogypicker wrote:
On Apr 8, 1:58 pm, wrote: On 4/8/10 1:53 PM, Loogypicker wrote: On Apr 8, 1:48 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, wrote: Well, I had not heard the term previously: http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq I approve. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad. Heh... Are you saying one of those models is in your little black book? I doubt it. Men have such unrealistic views of women... never ceases to amaze me. I read an interview with Cindy Crawford, and she said the "Cindy Crawford" in the magazines doesn't look like Cindy Crawford (the person). It's mostly airbrush, makeup, and lighting (with a healthy dose of good genes). -- Nom=de=Plume How in hell did my reply make you think that I was saying anything at all about me??? Whoosh! You're so stupid you didn't get it. What a surprise. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Pssst, dummy, did you notice that she directed the statement at ME??? Hence, she's implying that I somehow was saying something about (drumroll please) ME. I wasn't. It was a simple comment about your obsession with things you can't have. Anyone with any sense can see by your utter disdain for anyone that has things that you can't have, and by your lies about things that you claim to have or have done that you have this mental problem. You're a moron. There's nothing to be done about that. -- http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym |
Cheekies?
On Apr 8, 2:23*pm, hk wrote:
On 4/8/10 2:19 PM, Loogypicker wrote: On Apr 8, 1:58 pm, *wrote: On 4/8/10 1:53 PM, Loogypicker wrote: On Apr 8, 1:48 pm, * *wrote: * *wrote in message ... On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, * *wrote: Well, I had not heard the term previously: http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq I approve. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad. Heh... Are you saying one of those models is in your little black book? I doubt it. Men have such unrealistic views of women... never ceases to amaze me.. I read an interview with Cindy Crawford, and she said the "Cindy Crawford" in the magazines doesn't look like Cindy Crawford (the person). It's mostly airbrush, makeup, and lighting (with a healthy dose of good genes). -- Nom=de=Plume How in hell did my reply make you think that I was saying anything at all about me??? Whoosh! You're so stupid you didn't get it. What a surprise. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym-Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Pssst, dummy, did you notice that she directed the statement at ME??? Hence, she's implying that I somehow was saying something about (drumroll please) ME. I wasn't. It was a simple comment about your obsession with things you can't have. Anyone with any sense can see by your utter disdain for anyone that has things that you can't have, and by your lies about things that you claim to have or have done that you have this mental problem. You're a moron. There's nothing to be done about that. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym This is an excuse for me to rant on something. I HATE BOOB JOBS. Why do so many beautiful young women disfigure themselves to look out of proportion. Little ones are wonderful, remember, they will not sag with age most of the time whereas DDs will be dragging the floor by the time she is 50. |
Cheekies?
"Loogypicker" wrote in message
... On Apr 8, 1:48 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Loogypicker" wrote in message ... On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, hk wrote: Well, I had not heard the term previously: http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq I approve. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad. Heh... Are you saying one of those models is in your little black book? I doubt it. Men have such unrealistic views of women... never ceases to amaze me. I read an interview with Cindy Crawford, and she said the "Cindy Crawford" in the magazines doesn't look like Cindy Crawford (the person). It's mostly airbrush, makeup, and lighting (with a healthy dose of good genes). -- Nom=de=Plume How in hell did my reply make you think that I was saying anything at all about me??? You're a guy right? :) No offense intended. Some have evolved. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Cheekies?
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
... On Apr 8, 2:23 pm, hk wrote: On 4/8/10 2:19 PM, Loogypicker wrote: On Apr 8, 1:58 pm, wrote: On 4/8/10 1:53 PM, Loogypicker wrote: On Apr 8, 1:48 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, wrote: Well, I had not heard the term previously: http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq I approve. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad. Heh... Are you saying one of those models is in your little black book? I doubt it. Men have such unrealistic views of women... never ceases to amaze me. I read an interview with Cindy Crawford, and she said the "Cindy Crawford" in the magazines doesn't look like Cindy Crawford (the person). It's mostly airbrush, makeup, and lighting (with a healthy dose of good genes). -- Nom=de=Plume How in hell did my reply make you think that I was saying anything at all about me??? Whoosh! You're so stupid you didn't get it. What a surprise. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym-Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Pssst, dummy, did you notice that she directed the statement at ME??? Hence, she's implying that I somehow was saying something about (drumroll please) ME. I wasn't. It was a simple comment about your obsession with things you can't have. Anyone with any sense can see by your utter disdain for anyone that has things that you can't have, and by your lies about things that you claim to have or have done that you have this mental problem. You're a moron. There's nothing to be done about that. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym This is an excuse for me to rant on something. I HATE BOOB JOBS. Why do so many beautiful young women disfigure themselves to look out of proportion. Little ones are wonderful, remember, they will not sag with age most of the time whereas DDs will be dragging the floor by the time she is 50. Sanity! Thank you! -- Nom=de=Plume |
Cheekies?
On Apr 8, 2:23*pm, hk wrote:
On 4/8/10 2:17 PM, Loogypicker wrote: On Apr 8, 1:57 pm, *wrote: On 4/8/10 1:52 PM, Loogypicker wrote: On Apr 8, 1:37 pm, * *wrote: On 4/8/10 1:29 PM, Frogwatch wrote: On Apr 8, 1:03 pm, * * *wrote: On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, * * *wrote: Well, I had not heard the term previously: http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq I approve. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad. Every now and then, even HK makes sense. Loogy prefers boy butts. Just look at his relationship with SnottyScotty. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym Tell the group, one more time, just what you know about me.....OH, nothing. It's all lies, just like your miserable life. I agree, Loogy...I know nothing about you beyond what you post here. Which is why your imaginary legal action is going to go...nowhere. It's moving along nicely...... You're nothing more than a cowardly little twerp who hide behind a screen name. There's no evidence here that you are anything else... This from the pussy who's so afraid of me that he's going to answer his door with a gun drawn BWAAAHAAA!!! Since I wouldn't recognize you in a police lineup, Loogy, why do you think I would open the door for you with a drawn firearm? --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Because you're a scared fat pussy. |
Cheekies?
On Apr 8, 2:23*pm, hk wrote:
On 4/8/10 2:19 PM, Loogypicker wrote: On Apr 8, 1:58 pm, *wrote: On 4/8/10 1:53 PM, Loogypicker wrote: On Apr 8, 1:48 pm, * *wrote: * *wrote in message ... On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, * *wrote: Well, I had not heard the term previously: http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq I approve. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad. Heh... Are you saying one of those models is in your little black book? I doubt it. Men have such unrealistic views of women... never ceases to amaze me.. I read an interview with Cindy Crawford, and she said the "Cindy Crawford" in the magazines doesn't look like Cindy Crawford (the person). It's mostly airbrush, makeup, and lighting (with a healthy dose of good genes). -- Nom=de=Plume How in hell did my reply make you think that I was saying anything at all about me??? Whoosh! You're so stupid you didn't get it. What a surprise. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym-Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Pssst, dummy, did you notice that she directed the statement at ME??? Hence, she's implying that I somehow was saying something about (drumroll please) ME. I wasn't. It was a simple comment about your obsession with things you can't have. Anyone with any sense can see by your utter disdain for anyone that has things that you can't have, and by your lies about things that you claim to have or have done that you have this mental problem. You're a moron. There's nothing to be done about that. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hmmm, I don't have to lie about my education like YOU do...... |
Cheekies?
On Apr 8, 2:43*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Loogypicker" wrote in message ... On Apr 8, 1:48 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Loogypicker" wrote in message .... On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, hk wrote: Well, I had not heard the term previously: http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq I approve. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad. Heh... Are you saying one of those models is in your little black book? I doubt it. Men have such unrealistic views of women... never ceases to amaze me. I read an interview with Cindy Crawford, and she said the "Cindy Crawford" in the magazines doesn't look like Cindy Crawford (the person). It's mostly airbrush, makeup, and lighting (with a healthy dose of good genes). -- Nom=de=Plume How in hell did my reply make you think that I was saying anything at all about me??? You're a guy right? :) No offense intended. Some have evolved. -- Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So you're narrow mindedly lumping all men into a group that you think they belong, huh? |
Cheekies?
"Loogypicker" wrote in message
... On Apr 8, 2:43 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Loogypicker" wrote in message ... On Apr 8, 1:48 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Loogypicker" wrote in message ... On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, hk wrote: Well, I had not heard the term previously: http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq I approve. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad. Heh... Are you saying one of those models is in your little black book? I doubt it. Men have such unrealistic views of women... never ceases to amaze me. I read an interview with Cindy Crawford, and she said the "Cindy Crawford" in the magazines doesn't look like Cindy Crawford (the person). It's mostly airbrush, makeup, and lighting (with a healthy dose of good genes). -- Nom=de=Plume How in hell did my reply make you think that I was saying anything at all about me??? You're a guy right? :) No offense intended. Some have evolved. -- Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So you're narrow mindedly lumping all men into a group that you think they belong, huh? Of course! Men _are_ from Mars and not wholly rational no matter how evolved they might be. lol -- Nom=de=Plume |
Cheekies?
Loogypicker wrote:
On Apr 8, 1:48 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, wrote: Well, I had not heard the term previously: http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq I approve. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad. Heh... Are you saying one of those models is in your little black book? I doubt it. Men have such unrealistic views of women... never ceases to amaze me. I read an interview with Cindy Crawford, and she said the "Cindy Crawford" in the magazines doesn't look like Cindy Crawford (the person). It's mostly airbrush, makeup, and lighting (with a healthy dose of good genes). -- Nom=de=Plume How in hell did my reply make you think that I was saying anything at all about me??? It's one of her signature diversion moves. Obvious as hell but it makes her happy. |
Cheekies?
"Larry" wrote in message
... Loogypicker wrote: On Apr 8, 1:48 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, wrote: Well, I had not heard the term previously: http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq I approve. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad. Heh... Are you saying one of those models is in your little black book? I doubt it. Men have such unrealistic views of women... never ceases to amaze me. I read an interview with Cindy Crawford, and she said the "Cindy Crawford" in the magazines doesn't look like Cindy Crawford (the person). It's mostly airbrush, makeup, and lighting (with a healthy dose of good genes). -- Nom=de=Plume How in hell did my reply make you think that I was saying anything at all about me??? It's one of her signature diversion moves. Obvious as hell but it makes her happy. You're obviously a blowhard with no semblence of intelligence. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Cheekies?
On 08/04/2010 11:29 AM, Frogwatch wrote:
On Apr 8, 1:03 pm, wrote: On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, wrote: Well, I had not heard the term previously: http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq I approve. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad. Every now and then, even HK makes sense. Agreed. Might fine looking women for sure. -- Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money. |
Cheekies?
On Apr 8, 5:40*pm, Canuck57 wrote:
On 08/04/2010 11:29 AM, Frogwatch wrote: On Apr 8, 1:03 pm, *wrote: On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, *wrote: Well, I had not heard the term previously: http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq I approve. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad. Every now and then, even HK makes sense. Agreed. Might fine looking women for sure. -- Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money. What the hell was I supposed to have lied about? Typical irrational female. |
Cheekies?
On 08/04/2010 11:48 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message ... On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, wrote: Well, I had not heard the term previously: http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq I approve. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad. Heh... Are you saying one of those models is in your little black book? I doubt it. Men have such unrealistic views of women... never ceases to amaze me. I read an interview with Cindy Crawford, and she said the "Cindy Crawford" in the magazines doesn't look like Cindy Crawford (the person). It's mostly airbrush, makeup, and lighting (with a healthy dose of good genes). Took me a long time, but I found a sweet heart on the inside, smart too. Best thing, at 110 lbs she is a grandma and still looks better than most 18 year olds. No implants, no makeup ether. Rare find, I lucked out big time. Even likes boating and fishing. Men don't have to settle for second best and should not. Unless of course you are a liberal. Always look to the womans mother to see what she will be like after a batch of kids, mentally and physically. Yep, got to meet her mom and that is when I knew I had quality fox. -- Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money. |
Cheekies?
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Larry" wrote in message ... Loogypicker wrote: On Apr 8, 1:48 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, wrote: Well, I had not heard the term previously: http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq I approve. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad. Heh... Are you saying one of those models is in your little black book? I doubt it. Men have such unrealistic views of women... never ceases to amaze me. I read an interview with Cindy Crawford, and she said the "Cindy Crawford" in the magazines doesn't look like Cindy Crawford (the person). It's mostly airbrush, makeup, and lighting (with a healthy dose of good genes). -- Nom=de=Plume How in hell did my reply make you think that I was saying anything at all about me??? It's one of her signature diversion moves. Obvious as hell but it makes her happy. You're obviously a blowhard with no semblence of intelligence. -- Nom=de=Plume Yup...that's our Ditzy Dan! |
Cheekies?
"Canuck57" wrote in message
... On 08/04/2010 11:29 AM, Frogwatch wrote: On Apr 8, 1:03 pm, wrote: On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, wrote: Well, I had not heard the term previously: http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq I approve. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad. Every now and then, even HK makes sense. Agreed. Might fine looking women for sure. -- Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money. Might fine? Did they do something wrong? Or, are they mighty fine? Is that redneck speak or what. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Cheekies?
"Canuck57" wrote in message
... On 08/04/2010 11:48 AM, nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, wrote: Well, I had not heard the term previously: http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq I approve. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad. Heh... Are you saying one of those models is in your little black book? I doubt it. Men have such unrealistic views of women... never ceases to amaze me. I read an interview with Cindy Crawford, and she said the "Cindy Crawford" in the magazines doesn't look like Cindy Crawford (the person). It's mostly airbrush, makeup, and lighting (with a healthy dose of good genes). Took me a long time, but I found a sweet heart on the inside, smart too. Best thing, at 110 lbs she is a grandma and still looks better than most 18 year olds. No implants, no makeup ether. Rare find, I lucked out big time. Even likes boating and fishing. Definitely lucky, given who you are. Men don't have to settle for second best and should not. Unless of course you are a liberal. Always look to the womans mother to see what she will be like after a batch of kids, mentally and physically. Well, you're just such a manly man aren't you. Yep, got to meet her mom and that is when I knew I had quality fox. Why do I get the impression that you're totally full of it... -- Nom=de=Plume |
Cheekies?
On Apr 8, 7:21*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Larry" wrote in message ... Loogypicker wrote: On Apr 8, 1:48 pm, *wrote: *wrote in message .... On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, *wrote: Well, I had not heard the term previously: http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq I approve. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad. Heh... Are you saying one of those models is in your little black book? I doubt it. Men have such unrealistic views of women... never ceases to amaze me. I read an interview with Cindy Crawford, and she said the "Cindy Crawford" in the magazines doesn't look like Cindy Crawford (the person). It's mostly airbrush, makeup, and lighting (with a healthy dose of good genes). -- Nom=de=Plume How in hell did my reply make you think that I was saying anything at all about me??? It's one of her signature diversion moves. *Obvious as hell but it makes her happy. You're obviously a blowhard with no semblence of intelligence. -- Nom=de=Plume Quote: "What does this have to do with anything? I'm sure somewhere in your squirrel brain it does, but it's non-obvious." -- Nom=de=Plume |
Cheekies?
On 08/04/2010 6:42 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
On Apr 8, 5:40 pm, wrote: On 08/04/2010 11:29 AM, Frogwatch wrote: On Apr 8, 1:03 pm, wrote: On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, wrote: Well, I had not heard the term previously: http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq I approve. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad. Every now and then, even HK makes sense. Agreed. Might fine looking women for sure. -- Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money. What the hell was I supposed to have lied about? Typical irrational female. Didn't think you were lying at all. But females are an emotional part of the species. -- Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money. |
Cheekies?
On 4/9/10 8:51 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 08/04/2010 6:42 PM, Frogwatch wrote: On Apr 8, 5:40 pm, wrote: On 08/04/2010 11:29 AM, Frogwatch wrote: On Apr 8, 1:03 pm, wrote: On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, wrote: Well, I had not heard the term previously: http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq I approve. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad. Every now and then, even HK makes sense. Agreed. Might fine looking women for sure. -- Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money. What the hell was I supposed to have lied about? Typical irrational female. Didn't think you were lying at all. But females are an emotional part of the species. Are you implying men are not emotional? If so, that is an absurdity. -- http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym |
Cheekies?
On 08/04/2010 8:43 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message ... On 08/04/2010 11:48 AM, nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, wrote: Well, I had not heard the term previously: http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq I approve. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad. Heh... Are you saying one of those models is in your little black book? I doubt it. Men have such unrealistic views of women... never ceases to amaze me. I read an interview with Cindy Crawford, and she said the "Cindy Crawford" in the magazines doesn't look like Cindy Crawford (the person). It's mostly airbrush, makeup, and lighting (with a healthy dose of good genes). Took me a long time, but I found a sweet heart on the inside, smart too. Best thing, at 110 lbs she is a grandma and still looks better than most 18 year olds. No implants, no makeup ether. Rare find, I lucked out big time. Even likes boating and fishing. Definitely lucky, given who you are. It wasn't my first kick at the can. My first kick made me think quite a bit differently in what it would take for me to go to the alter again. The second time, the criteria was quite high in all fronts as I was prepared to be a devout single. It was a smart move in dumping my ex. BTW, I don't look at it as the exes fault, we both were too immature at the time. Probably would still be single if not for meeting my wife. Happy I did, but if she wasn't the best, I would have not taken a second run at it. Men don't have to settle for second best and should not. Unless of course you are a liberal. Always look to the womans mother to see what she will be like after a batch of kids, mentally and physically. Well, you're just such a manly man aren't you. Hey, women want to put a collar around a mans neck called marriage. It is really a leash. So if your willing to do that better make sure she is worth it as divorce is no fun. Yep, got to meet her mom and that is when I knew I had quality fox. Why do I get the impression that you're totally full of it... Because you never met me. Not going to either. Mind you, on the flip someone like Tiger Woods should never get married. -- Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money. |
Cheekies?
"Loogypicker" wrote in message ... On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, hk wrote: Well, I had not heard the term previously: http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq I approve. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad. -------- Sure he can. From $14.50- $149 but I wouldn't want to see him in it. Think I'll go scrub my mind. |
Cheekies?
"Canuck57" wrote in message
... On 08/04/2010 6:42 PM, Frogwatch wrote: On Apr 8, 5:40 pm, wrote: On 08/04/2010 11:29 AM, Frogwatch wrote: On Apr 8, 1:03 pm, wrote: On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, wrote: Well, I had not heard the term previously: http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq I approve. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad. Every now and then, even HK makes sense. Agreed. Might fine looking women for sure. -- Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money. What the hell was I supposed to have lied about? Typical irrational female. Didn't think you were lying at all. But females are an emotional part of the species. You're a typical pig of the species. No brains... sees better than he thinks. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Cheekies?
"Don White" wrote in message
... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Larry" wrote in message ... Loogypicker wrote: On Apr 8, 1:48 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, wrote: Well, I had not heard the term previously: http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq I approve. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad. Heh... Are you saying one of those models is in your little black book? I doubt it. Men have such unrealistic views of women... never ceases to amaze me. I read an interview with Cindy Crawford, and she said the "Cindy Crawford" in the magazines doesn't look like Cindy Crawford (the person). It's mostly airbrush, makeup, and lighting (with a healthy dose of good genes). -- Nom=de=Plume How in hell did my reply make you think that I was saying anything at all about me??? It's one of her signature diversion moves. Obvious as hell but it makes her happy. You're obviously a blowhard with no semblence of intelligence. -- Nom=de=Plume Yup...that's our Ditzy Dan! Why does he call himself Larry? Strange. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Cheekies?
On 4/9/10 2:30 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"Don wrote in message ... wrote in message ... wrote in message ... Loogypicker wrote: On Apr 8, 1:48 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, wrote: Well, I had not heard the term previously: http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq I approve. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad. Heh... Are you saying one of those models is in your little black book? I doubt it. Men have such unrealistic views of women... never ceases to amaze me. I read an interview with Cindy Crawford, and she said the "Cindy Crawford" in the magazines doesn't look like Cindy Crawford (the person). It's mostly airbrush, makeup, and lighting (with a healthy dose of good genes). -- Nom=de=Plume How in hell did my reply make you think that I was saying anything at all about me??? It's one of her signature diversion moves. Obvious as hell but it makes her happy. You're obviously a blowhard with no semblence of intelligence. -- Nom=de=Plume Yup...that's our Ditzy Dan! Why does he call himself Larry? Strange. Because we caught him when he called himself Bob. -- http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym |
Cheekies?
"Canuck57" wrote in message
... On 08/04/2010 8:43 PM, nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On 08/04/2010 11:48 AM, nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, wrote: Well, I had not heard the term previously: http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq I approve. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad. Heh... Are you saying one of those models is in your little black book? I doubt it. Men have such unrealistic views of women... never ceases to amaze me. I read an interview with Cindy Crawford, and she said the "Cindy Crawford" in the magazines doesn't look like Cindy Crawford (the person). It's mostly airbrush, makeup, and lighting (with a healthy dose of good genes). Took me a long time, but I found a sweet heart on the inside, smart too. Best thing, at 110 lbs she is a grandma and still looks better than most 18 year olds. No implants, no makeup ether. Rare find, I lucked out big time. Even likes boating and fishing. Definitely lucky, given who you are. It wasn't my first kick at the can. My first kick made me think quite a bit differently in what it would take for me to go to the alter again. The second time, the criteria was quite high in all fronts as I was prepared to be a devout single. It was a smart move in dumping my ex. BTW, I don't look at it as the exes fault, we both were too immature at the time. Basically, you got dumped as soon as she figured it out. Probably would still be single if not for meeting my wife. Happy I did, but if she wasn't the best, I would have not taken a second run at it. Men don't have to settle for second best and should not. Unless of course you are a liberal. Always look to the womans mother to see what she will be like after a batch of kids, mentally and physically. Well, you're just such a manly man aren't you. Hey, women want to put a collar around a mans neck called marriage. It is really a leash. So if your willing to do that better make sure she is worth it as divorce is no fun. Sure. Typical bs. You certainly had nothing to do with your own problems. It's always someone else's fault. Yep, got to meet her mom and that is when I knew I had quality fox. Why do I get the impression that you're totally full of it... Because you never met me. Not going to either. I'm eternally grateful for this. Mind you, on the flip someone like Tiger Woods should never get married. Why not? Are you talking about some restriction you want to put on men's freedom to act like a jackass? -- Nom=de=Plume |
Cheekies?
On 09/04/2010 6:58 AM, hk wrote:
On 4/9/10 8:51 AM, Canuck57 wrote: On 08/04/2010 6:42 PM, Frogwatch wrote: On Apr 8, 5:40 pm, wrote: On 08/04/2010 11:29 AM, Frogwatch wrote: On Apr 8, 1:03 pm, wrote: On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, wrote: Well, I had not heard the term previously: http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq I approve. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad. Every now and then, even HK makes sense. Agreed. Might fine looking women for sure. -- Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money. What the hell was I supposed to have lied about? Typical irrational female. Didn't think you were lying at all. But females are an emotional part of the species. Are you implying men are not emotional? If so, that is an absurdity. Nope, just that the fair sex is generally more emotional. -- Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money. |
Cheekies?
On 09/04/2010 12:33 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message ... On 08/04/2010 8:43 PM, nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On 08/04/2010 11:48 AM, nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, wrote: Well, I had not heard the term previously: http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq I approve. --http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad. Heh... Are you saying one of those models is in your little black book? I doubt it. Men have such unrealistic views of women... never ceases to amaze me. I read an interview with Cindy Crawford, and she said the "Cindy Crawford" in the magazines doesn't look like Cindy Crawford (the person). It's mostly airbrush, makeup, and lighting (with a healthy dose of good genes). Took me a long time, but I found a sweet heart on the inside, smart too. Best thing, at 110 lbs she is a grandma and still looks better than most 18 year olds. No implants, no makeup ether. Rare find, I lucked out big time. Even likes boating and fishing. Definitely lucky, given who you are. It wasn't my first kick at the can. My first kick made me think quite a bit differently in what it would take for me to go to the alter again. The second time, the criteria was quite high in all fronts as I was prepared to be a devout single. It was a smart move in dumping my ex. BTW, I don't look at it as the exes fault, we both were too immature at the time. Basically, you got dumped as soon as she figured it out. Probably would still be single if not for meeting my wife. Happy I did, but if she wasn't the best, I would have not taken a second run at it. Men don't have to settle for second best and should not. Unless of course you are a liberal. Always look to the womans mother to see what she will be like after a batch of kids, mentally and physically. Well, you're just such a manly man aren't you. Hey, women want to put a collar around a mans neck called marriage. It is really a leash. So if your willing to do that better make sure she is worth it as divorce is no fun. Sure. Typical bs. You certainly had nothing to do with your own problems. It's always someone else's fault. Yep, got to meet her mom and that is when I knew I had quality fox. Why do I get the impression that you're totally full of it... Because you never met me. Not going to either. I'm eternally grateful for this. Mind you, on the flip someone like Tiger Woods should never get married. Why not? Are you talking about some restriction you want to put on men's freedom to act like a jackass? So what is your story? Fat, unemployed, on the lamb... Grobbling for free lunches on someone elses shirt tails? We know for sure you are no "Cheekies"... -- Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:55 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com