Cheekies?
 

On Apr 8, 1:57*pm, hk wrote:
On 4/8/10 1:52 PM, Loogypicker wrote:





On Apr 8, 1:37 pm, *wrote:
On 4/8/10 1:29 PM, Frogwatch wrote:

On Apr 8, 1:03 pm, * *wrote:
On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, * *wrote:

Well, I had not heard the term previously:

http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq

I approve.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad.

Every now and then, even HK makes sense.

Loogy prefers boy butts. Just look at his relationship with SnottyScotty.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

Tell the group, one more time, just what you know about me.....OH,
nothing. It's all lies, just like your miserable life.

I agree, Loogy...I know nothing about you beyond what you post here.
Which is why your imaginary legal action is going to go...nowhere.

It's moving along nicely......

You're nothing more than a cowardly little twerp who hide behind a
screen name. There's no evidence here that you are anything else...

This from the pussy who's so afraid of me that he's going to answer
his door with a gun drawn BWAAAHAAA!!!

Cheekies?
 

On Apr 8, 1:58*pm, hk wrote:
On 4/8/10 1:53 PM, Loogypicker wrote:





On Apr 8, 1:48 pm, *wrote:
*wrote in message

....
On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, *wrote:

Well, I had not heard the term previously:

http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq

I approve.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym
More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad.

Heh... Are you saying one of those models is in your little black book? I
doubt it.

Men have such unrealistic views of women... never ceases to amaze me. I read
an interview with Cindy Crawford, and she said the "Cindy Crawford" in the
magazines doesn't look like Cindy Crawford (the person). It's mostly
airbrush, makeup, and lighting (with a healthy dose of good genes).

--
Nom=de=Plume

How in hell did my reply make you think that I was saying anything at
all about me???

Whoosh!

You're so stupid you didn't get it. What a surprise.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Pssst, dummy, did you notice that she directed the statement at ME???
Hence, she's implying that I somehow was saying something about
(drumroll please) ME. I wasn't. It was a simple comment about your
obsession with things you can't have. Anyone with any sense can see by
your utter disdain for anyone that has things that you can't have, and
by your lies about things that you claim to have or have done that you
have this mental problem.

Cheekies?
 

On 4/8/10 2:17 PM, Loogypicker wrote:
On Apr 8, 1:57 pm, wrote:
On 4/8/10 1:52 PM, Loogypicker wrote:





On Apr 8, 1:37 pm, wrote:
On 4/8/10 1:29 PM, Frogwatch wrote:

On Apr 8, 1:03 pm, wrote:
On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, wrote:

Well, I had not heard the term previously:

http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq

I approve.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad.

Every now and then, even HK makes sense.

Loogy prefers boy butts. Just look at his relationship with SnottyScotty.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

Tell the group, one more time, just what you know about me.....OH,
nothing. It's all lies, just like your miserable life.

I agree, Loogy...I know nothing about you beyond what you post here.
Which is why your imaginary legal action is going to go...nowhere.

It's moving along nicely......

You're nothing more than a cowardly little twerp who hide behind a
screen name. There's no evidence here that you are anything else...

This from the pussy who's so afraid of me that he's going to answer
his door with a gun drawn BWAAAHAAA!!!



Since I wouldn't recognize you in a police lineup, Loogy, why do you
think I would open the door for you with a drawn firearm?

--
http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

Cheekies?
 

On 4/8/10 2:19 PM, Loogypicker wrote:
On Apr 8, 1:58 pm, wrote:
On 4/8/10 1:53 PM, Loogypicker wrote:





On Apr 8, 1:48 pm, wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, wrote:

Well, I had not heard the term previously:

http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq

I approve.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym
More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad.

Heh... Are you saying one of those models is in your little black book? I
doubt it.

Men have such unrealistic views of women... never ceases to amaze me. I read
an interview with Cindy Crawford, and she said the "Cindy Crawford" in the
magazines doesn't look like Cindy Crawford (the person). It's mostly
airbrush, makeup, and lighting (with a healthy dose of good genes).

--
Nom=de=Plume

How in hell did my reply make you think that I was saying anything at
all about me???

Whoosh!

You're so stupid you didn't get it. What a surprise.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Pssst, dummy, did you notice that she directed the statement at ME???
Hence, she's implying that I somehow was saying something about
(drumroll please) ME. I wasn't. It was a simple comment about your
obsession with things you can't have. Anyone with any sense can see by
your utter disdain for anyone that has things that you can't have, and
by your lies about things that you claim to have or have done that you
have this mental problem.

You're a moron. There's nothing to be done about that.



--
http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

Cheekies?
 

On Apr 8, 2:23*pm, hk wrote:
On 4/8/10 2:19 PM, Loogypicker wrote:



On Apr 8, 1:58 pm, *wrote:
On 4/8/10 1:53 PM, Loogypicker wrote:

On Apr 8, 1:48 pm, * *wrote:
* *wrote in message

...
On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, * *wrote:

Well, I had not heard the term previously:

http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq

I approve.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym
More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad.

Heh... Are you saying one of those models is in your little black book? I
doubt it.

Men have such unrealistic views of women... never ceases to amaze me.. I read
an interview with Cindy Crawford, and she said the "Cindy Crawford" in the
magazines doesn't look like Cindy Crawford (the person). It's mostly
airbrush, makeup, and lighting (with a healthy dose of good genes).

--
Nom=de=Plume

How in hell did my reply make you think that I was saying anything at
all about me???

Whoosh!

You're so stupid you didn't get it. What a surprise.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym-Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Pssst, dummy, did you notice that she directed the statement at ME???
Hence, she's implying that I somehow was saying something about
(drumroll please) ME. I wasn't. It was a simple comment about your
obsession with things you can't have. Anyone with any sense can see by
your utter disdain for anyone that has things that you can't have, and
by your lies about things that you claim to have or have done that you
have this mental problem.

You're a moron. There's nothing to be done about that.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

This is an excuse for me to rant on something. I HATE BOOB JOBS. Why
do so many beautiful young women disfigure themselves to look out of
proportion. Little ones are wonderful, remember, they will not sag
with age most of the time whereas DDs will be dragging the floor by
the time she is 50.

Cheekies?
 

"Loogypicker" wrote in message
...
On Apr 8, 1:48 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Loogypicker" wrote in message

...
On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, hk wrote:

Well, I had not heard the term previously:

http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq

I approve.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym
More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad.

Heh... Are you saying one of those models is in your little black book? I
doubt it.

Men have such unrealistic views of women... never ceases to amaze me. I
read
an interview with Cindy Crawford, and she said the "Cindy Crawford" in the
magazines doesn't look like Cindy Crawford (the person). It's mostly
airbrush, makeup, and lighting (with a healthy dose of good genes).

--
Nom=de=Plume

How in hell did my reply make you think that I was saying anything at
all about me???


You're a guy right? :) No offense intended. Some have evolved.
--
Nom=de=Plume

Cheekies?
 

"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On Apr 8, 2:23 pm, hk wrote:
On 4/8/10 2:19 PM, Loogypicker wrote:



On Apr 8, 1:58 pm, wrote:
On 4/8/10 1:53 PM, Loogypicker wrote:

On Apr 8, 1:48 pm, wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, wrote:

Well, I had not heard the term previously:

http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq

I approve.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym
More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad.

Heh... Are you saying one of those models is in your little black
book? I
doubt it.

Men have such unrealistic views of women... never ceases to amaze me.
I read
an interview with Cindy Crawford, and she said the "Cindy Crawford"
in the
magazines doesn't look like Cindy Crawford (the person). It's mostly
airbrush, makeup, and lighting (with a healthy dose of good genes).

--
Nom=de=Plume

How in hell did my reply make you think that I was saying anything at
all about me???

Whoosh!

You're so stupid you didn't get it. What a surprise.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym-Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Pssst, dummy, did you notice that she directed the statement at ME???
Hence, she's implying that I somehow was saying something about
(drumroll please) ME. I wasn't. It was a simple comment about your
obsession with things you can't have. Anyone with any sense can see by
your utter disdain for anyone that has things that you can't have, and
by your lies about things that you claim to have or have done that you
have this mental problem.

You're a moron. There's nothing to be done about that.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

This is an excuse for me to rant on something. I HATE BOOB JOBS. Why
do so many beautiful young women disfigure themselves to look out of
proportion. Little ones are wonderful, remember, they will not sag
with age most of the time whereas DDs will be dragging the floor by
the time she is 50.


Sanity! Thank you!

--
Nom=de=Plume

Cheekies?
 

On Apr 8, 2:23*pm, hk wrote:
On 4/8/10 2:17 PM, Loogypicker wrote:





On Apr 8, 1:57 pm, *wrote:
On 4/8/10 1:52 PM, Loogypicker wrote:

On Apr 8, 1:37 pm, * *wrote:
On 4/8/10 1:29 PM, Frogwatch wrote:

On Apr 8, 1:03 pm, * * *wrote:
On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, * * *wrote:

Well, I had not heard the term previously:

http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq

I approve.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad.

Every now and then, even HK makes sense.

Loogy prefers boy butts. Just look at his relationship with SnottyScotty.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

Tell the group, one more time, just what you know about me.....OH,
nothing. It's all lies, just like your miserable life.

I agree, Loogy...I know nothing about you beyond what you post here.
Which is why your imaginary legal action is going to go...nowhere.

It's moving along nicely......

You're nothing more than a cowardly little twerp who hide behind a
screen name. There's no evidence here that you are anything else...

This from the pussy who's so afraid of me that he's going to answer
his door with a gun drawn BWAAAHAAA!!!

Since I wouldn't recognize you in a police lineup, Loogy, why do you
think I would open the door for you with a drawn firearm?

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Because you're a scared fat pussy.

Cheekies?
 

On Apr 8, 2:23*pm, hk wrote:
On 4/8/10 2:19 PM, Loogypicker wrote:





On Apr 8, 1:58 pm, *wrote:
On 4/8/10 1:53 PM, Loogypicker wrote:

On Apr 8, 1:48 pm, * *wrote:
* *wrote in message

...
On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, * *wrote:

Well, I had not heard the term previously:

http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq

I approve.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym
More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad.

Heh... Are you saying one of those models is in your little black book? I
doubt it.

Men have such unrealistic views of women... never ceases to amaze me.. I read
an interview with Cindy Crawford, and she said the "Cindy Crawford" in the
magazines doesn't look like Cindy Crawford (the person). It's mostly
airbrush, makeup, and lighting (with a healthy dose of good genes).

--
Nom=de=Plume

How in hell did my reply make you think that I was saying anything at
all about me???

Whoosh!

You're so stupid you didn't get it. What a surprise.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym-Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Pssst, dummy, did you notice that she directed the statement at ME???
Hence, she's implying that I somehow was saying something about
(drumroll please) ME. I wasn't. It was a simple comment about your
obsession with things you can't have. Anyone with any sense can see by
your utter disdain for anyone that has things that you can't have, and
by your lies about things that you claim to have or have done that you
have this mental problem.

You're a moron. There's nothing to be done about that.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hmmm, I don't have to lie about my education like YOU do......

Cheekies?
 

On Apr 8, 2:43*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Loogypicker" wrote in message

...
On Apr 8, 1:48 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:





"Loogypicker" wrote in message

....
On Apr 8, 12:21 pm, hk wrote:

Well, I had not heard the term previously:

http://tinyurl.com/ygujxbq

I approve.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym
More of Harry's obsession with things he can't have.......so sad.

Heh... Are you saying one of those models is in your little black book? I
doubt it.

Men have such unrealistic views of women... never ceases to amaze me. I
read
an interview with Cindy Crawford, and she said the "Cindy Crawford" in the
magazines doesn't look like Cindy Crawford (the person). It's mostly
airbrush, makeup, and lighting (with a healthy dose of good genes).

--
Nom=de=Plume
How in hell did my reply make you think that I was saying anything at
all about me???

You're a guy right? :) No offense intended. Some have evolved.
--
Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

So you're narrow mindedly lumping all men into a group that you think
they belong, huh?