On Apr 4, 7:00*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 16:57:04 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 04/04/2010 3:22 PM, hk wrote:

NBER’s Hall Says Payrolls Make It ‘Pretty Clear’ Recession Over

[ snip ]

Guess Hall is into turd polishing.

Get the real numbers he

http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm

But the numbers are suspect. *How can numbers on payroll increase if
current unemployment stays the same, and long term unemployment rises?
People getting part time second jobs?

because more people who were discouraged and dropped out of looking
for jobs have re-entered the search.

guess rush didn't tell you that.



GDP up so far ahead of jobs, smells mighty inflationary to me

ROFLMAO!! you right whiners know NOTHING about economics!!

only when employment starts to drop will inflation be a problem. that
won't happen for years. in fact, inflation hasnt been a problem in 30
years...

There is Demo-Spin and then there is reality:
http://www.qando.net/?p=7787
The reality is that any new jobs were "created" by the govt spending
money it does not have, not by any real job creation.

On 4/4/10 10:04 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
On Apr 4, 7:00 pm, wrote:
On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 16:57:04 -0600,
wrote:

On 04/04/2010 3:22 PM, hk wrote:

NBER’s Hall Says Payrolls Make It ‘Pretty Clear’ Recession Over

[ snip ]

Guess Hall is into turd polishing.

Get the real numbers he

http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm

But the numbers are suspect. How can numbers on payroll increase if
current unemployment stays the same, and long term unemployment rises?
People getting part time second jobs?

because more people who were discouraged and dropped out of looking
for jobs have re-entered the search.

guess rush didn't tell you that.



GDP up so far ahead of jobs, smells mighty inflationary to me

ROFLMAO!! you right whiners know NOTHING about economics!!

only when employment starts to drop will inflation be a problem. that
won't happen for years. in fact, inflation hasnt been a problem in 30
years...

There is Demo-Spin and then there is reality:
http://www.qando.net/?p=7787
The reality is that any new jobs were "created" by the govt spending
money it does not have, not by any real job creation.

You quote a right-wing extremist web site for your "reality"? No wonder
your business is failing...


--
http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 19:04:54 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

On Apr 4, 7:00*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 16:57:04 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:


because more people who were discouraged and dropped out of looking
for jobs have re-entered the search.

guess rush didn't tell you that.



GDP up so far ahead of jobs, smells mighty inflationary to me

ROFLMAO!! you right whiners know NOTHING about economics!!

only when employment starts to drop will inflation be a problem. that
won't happen for years. in fact, inflation hasnt been a problem in 30
years...

There is Demo-Spin and then there is reality:
http://www.qando.net/?p=7787
The reality is that any new jobs were "created" by the govt spending
money it does not have, not by any real job creation.

ROFLMAO!! really? so when the govt invests in universities, it creates
no jobs by educating engineers, scientists, doctors, etc?

the only thing more pathetic than your argument

is your intellect.

On 04/04/2010 9:30 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 19:04:54 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

On Apr 4, 7:00 pm, wrote:
On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 16:57:04 -0600,
wrote:


because more people who were discouraged and dropped out of looking
for jobs have re-entered the search.

guess rush didn't tell you that.



GDP up so far ahead of jobs, smells mighty inflationary to me

ROFLMAO!! you right whiners know NOTHING about economics!!

only when employment starts to drop will inflation be a problem. that
won't happen for years. in fact, inflation hasnt been a problem in 30
years...

There is Demo-Spin and then there is reality:
http://www.qando.net/?p=7787
The reality is that any new jobs were "created" by the govt spending
money it does not have, not by any real job creation.

ROFLMAO!! really? so when the govt invests in universities, it creates
no jobs by educating engineers, scientists, doctors, etc?

the only thing more pathetic than your argument

is your intellect.

Actually, educating people does not create jobs directly. It is a
capitalized reinvestment. A certain amount is good, and like anything
else, too much or too little is not good. There is a bell curve sweet
spot. Historically, I have alsways though the US did a good job on
this. Not so sure going forward.

As remember, they remove money from peoples pockets they could spend on
economic activity. Take too much and it stalls the economy.

--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 04/04/2010 9:30 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 19:04:54 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

On Apr 4, 7:00 pm, wrote:
On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 16:57:04 -0600,
wrote:


because more people who were discouraged and dropped out of looking
for jobs have re-entered the search.

guess rush didn't tell you that.



GDP up so far ahead of jobs, smells mighty inflationary to me

ROFLMAO!! you right whiners know NOTHING about economics!!

only when employment starts to drop will inflation be a problem. that
won't happen for years. in fact, inflation hasnt been a problem in 30
years...

There is Demo-Spin and then there is reality:
http://www.qando.net/?p=7787
The reality is that any new jobs were "created" by the govt spending
money it does not have, not by any real job creation.

ROFLMAO!! really? so when the govt invests in universities, it creates
no jobs by educating engineers, scientists, doctors, etc?

the only thing more pathetic than your argument

is your intellect.

Actually, educating people does not create jobs directly. It is a
capitalized reinvestment. A certain amount is good, and like anything
else, too much or too little is not good. There is a bell curve sweet
spot. Historically, I have alsways though the US did a good job on this.
Not so sure going forward.

As remember, they remove money from peoples pockets they could spend on
economic activity. Take too much and it stalls the economy.

--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.


You are obviously a product of that under-education. Too much is bad? Too
much education is bad????? You're just plain dumb.

--
Nom=de=Plume

On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 11:16:18 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 04/04/2010 9:30 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 19:04:54 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:


ROFLMAO!! really? so when the govt invests in universities, it creates
no jobs by educating engineers, scientists, doctors, etc?

the only thing more pathetic than your argument

is your intellect.

Actually, educating people does not create jobs directly. It is a
capitalized reinvestment.

gee. i guess that's why i called it an investment. and one could make
the same argument about a new steel plant. it's an investment

so, yes, education and other investments do build an economy

and most education is provided by the govt.

"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On Apr 4, 7:00 pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 16:57:04 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 04/04/2010 3:22 PM, hk wrote:

NBER’s Hall Says Payrolls Make It ‘Pretty Clear’ Recession Over

[ snip ]

Guess Hall is into turd polishing.

Get the real numbers he

http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm

But the numbers are suspect. How can numbers on payroll increase if
current unemployment stays the same, and long term unemployment rises?
People getting part time second jobs?

because more people who were discouraged and dropped out of looking
for jobs have re-entered the search.

guess rush didn't tell you that.



GDP up so far ahead of jobs, smells mighty inflationary to me

ROFLMAO!! you right whiners know NOTHING about economics!!

only when employment starts to drop will inflation be a problem. that
won't happen for years. in fact, inflation hasnt been a problem in 30
years...

There is Demo-Spin and then there is reality:
http://www.qando.net/?p=7787
The reality is that any new jobs were "created" by the govt spending
money it does not have, not by any real job creation.


The reality is that you aren't able to figure out simple math.
--
Nom=de=Plume

On Apr 4, 11:10*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Frogwatch" wrote in message

...
On Apr 4, 7:00 pm, bpuharic wrote:



On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 16:57:04 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 04/04/2010 3:22 PM, hk wrote:

NBER’s Hall Says Payrolls Make It ‘Pretty Clear’ Recession Over

[ snip ]

Guess Hall is into turd polishing.

Get the real numbers he

http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm

But the numbers are suspect. How can numbers on payroll increase if
current unemployment stays the same, and long term unemployment rises?
People getting part time second jobs?

because more people who were discouraged and dropped out of looking
for jobs have re-entered the search.

guess rush didn't tell you that.

GDP up so far ahead of jobs, smells mighty inflationary to me

ROFLMAO!! you right whiners know NOTHING about economics!!

only when employment starts to drop will inflation be a problem. that
won't happen for years. in fact, inflation hasnt been a problem in 30
years...
There is Demo-Spin and then there is reality:
http://www.qando.net/?p=7787
The reality is that any new jobs were "created" by the govt spending
money it does not have, not by any real job creation.

The reality is that you aren't able to figure out simple math.
--
Nom=de=Plume

The reality is that you aren't able to figure out simple English:

"You don't even read what you right, do you. Good grief."

--
Nom=de=Plume

"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
On Apr 4, 11:10 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Frogwatch" wrote in message

...
On Apr 4, 7:00 pm, bpuharic wrote:



On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 16:57:04 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 04/04/2010 3:22 PM, hk wrote:

NBER’s Hall Says Payrolls Make It ‘Pretty Clear’ Recession Over

[ snip ]

Guess Hall is into turd polishing.

Get the real numbers he

http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm

But the numbers are suspect. How can numbers on payroll increase if
current unemployment stays the same, and long term unemployment rises?
People getting part time second jobs?

because more people who were discouraged and dropped out of looking
for jobs have re-entered the search.

guess rush didn't tell you that.

GDP up so far ahead of jobs, smells mighty inflationary to me

ROFLMAO!! you right whiners know NOTHING about economics!!

only when employment starts to drop will inflation be a problem. that
won't happen for years. in fact, inflation hasnt been a problem in 30
years...
There is Demo-Spin and then there is reality:
http://www.qando.net/?p=7787
The reality is that any new jobs were "created" by the govt spending
money it does not have, not by any real job creation.

The reality is that you aren't able to figure out simple math.
--
Nom=de=Plume

The reality is that you aren't able to figure out simple English:

"You don't even read what you right, do you. Good grief."

--
Nom=de=Plume


Reply: Come on... a few more times and you'll get there.... keep going!!!!

--
Nom=de=Plume

nom=de=plume wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
On Apr 4, 11:10 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Frogwatch" wrote in message

...
On Apr 4, 7:00 pm, bpuharic wrote:



On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 16:57:04 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:
On 04/04/2010 3:22 PM, hk wrote:
NBER’s Hall Says Payrolls Make It ‘Pretty Clear’ Recession Over
[ snip ]
Guess Hall is into turd polishing.
Get the real numbers he
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm
But the numbers are suspect. How can numbers on payroll increase if
current unemployment stays the same, and long term unemployment rises?
People getting part time second jobs?
because more people who were discouraged and dropped out of looking
for jobs have re-entered the search.
guess rush didn't tell you that.
GDP up so far ahead of jobs, smells mighty inflationary to me
ROFLMAO!! you right whiners know NOTHING about economics!!
only when employment starts to drop will inflation be a problem. that
won't happen for years. in fact, inflation hasnt been a problem in 30
years...
There is Demo-Spin and then there is reality:
http://www.qando.net/?p=7787
The reality is that any new jobs were "created" by the govt spending
money it does not have, not by any real job creation.
The reality is that you aren't able to figure out simple math.
--
Nom=de=Plume

The reality is that you aren't able to figure out simple English:

"You don't even read what you right, do you. Good grief."

--
Nom=de=Plume


Reply: Come on... a few more times and you'll get there.... keep going!!!!

He's working himself up for a fit of uncontrollable laughter, isn't he?