"Don White" wrote in message
...

"hk" wrote in message
m...
On 3/28/10 3:31 PM, Larry wrote:
Don White wrote:
"Larry" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"Larry" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"thunder" wrote in message
t...
On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 12:47:50 -0700, Frogwatch wrote:


Evidence (proof) the left is not just violent but ULTRA-violent:
Stalin,
Mao, Pol Pot, Castro, Che, Shining Path, Bill Ayers plot to kill
20
million Americans, etc.
LOL, Communists all. Historically, however, I'd point out that
Democracies are immune to communism. There are very few, perhaps
three,
democracies that have been overthrown by communists, or from the
left,
for that matter. Fascism, on the other hand, had been the death
of many,
many, democracies.

Here's a question for you, which country has overthrown more
democracies,
the USSR, or the USA? When you answer that, you may want to
consider
which is the more violent, the left or the right.
It's sad that some people are unable to understand things in a
historical perspective to the point of making threats and causing
violence. If there's anything that scares me more than the threats
against our elected officials more, I can't think of it. Doesn't
matter if the person is on the right or the left of a debate.
There's no excuse for threatening violence. Comments like baby
killer, and time to reload, and spitting on people, and yelling
expletives have no place in our society. I vehemently disagree
with the hubris of Stupak, but to wish him dead? I dislike Rush
more than I can say, but I would much rather patiently wait for
him to stroke out than call for violence, even though that's what
he promotes. I wouldn't spit on a dog I didn't like (and I don't
like many) no less a human being.

Welcome back!
I've done some work getting Walker Bay info together for you in
anticipation of your return. Too much info to post here.
Just e-mail me.
Oh. Hope your trip went well, and welcome back!
And I agree with what you said above.
Very perceptive. I appreciate your sensitivity in judging this type
of
issue. Your legal training shines through.
Ok, enough. Don't want to appear too "gushing" in my praise.
Wouldn't be prudent.

I'm interested to know what kind of "info" you've put together that
she can't get from the Walker Bay website...or a local dealer.

This doesn't concern you, Don.
Go see if there's any beer left in the refrigerator.


Thought so!
Does you wife know you're stalking young ladies over the internet?
Get real. Common courtesy is called "stalking" in Canada?


Look...it's krueger with yet another new handle.


That explains a lot!
He's desperately phishing for Ms. Plume's e-mail address.

He's not even very good at it. He didn't say anything about my eyes.

--
Nom=de=Plume

"D.Duck" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:

snip

Doesn't matter if the person is on the right or the left of a debate.
There's no excuse for threatening violence.

Then you must have disdain for hk. Oh, that's right, he just "wishes" ill
will to those that disagree with him.


So, you can't read?

--
Nom=de=Plume

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 21:22:10 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
. ..
On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 12:31:26 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

and cantor got no more threats than other members of congress

. These are facts. Cantor did
not say the bullet was from any Dems, I did and I still believe it is
probably true, the coincidence is simply to extreme otherwise.
bpuharic needs to "man-up" and admit Cantor did not lie.

and you're welcome to your paranoid lies.

the police dept in richmond says you're wrong. so you're a liar


And why does the Richmond PD say it was random? Proof of some sort that
it
was random? What proof, or just a good way of getting out of the frypan?

and proof that the right wing lie is the truth? you wanna play
infinite regression?


Why do you flaunt your stupidity?

nom=de=plume wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message
...
"hk" wrote in message
m...
On 3/28/10 3:31 PM, Larry wrote:
Don White wrote:
"Larry" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"Larry" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"thunder" wrote in message
t...
On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 12:47:50 -0700, Frogwatch wrote:


Evidence (proof) the left is not just violent but ULTRA-violent:
Stalin,
Mao, Pol Pot, Castro, Che, Shining Path, Bill Ayers plot to kill
20
million Americans, etc.
LOL, Communists all. Historically, however, I'd point out that
Democracies are immune to communism. There are very few, perhaps
three,
democracies that have been overthrown by communists, or from the
left,
for that matter. Fascism, on the other hand, had been the death
of many,
many, democracies.

Here's a question for you, which country has overthrown more
democracies,
the USSR, or the USA? When you answer that, you may want to
consider
which is the more violent, the left or the right.
It's sad that some people are unable to understand things in a
historical perspective to the point of making threats and causing
violence. If there's anything that scares me more than the threats
against our elected officials more, I can't think of it. Doesn't
matter if the person is on the right or the left of a debate.
There's no excuse for threatening violence. Comments like baby
killer, and time to reload, and spitting on people, and yelling
expletives have no place in our society. I vehemently disagree
with the hubris of Stupak, but to wish him dead? I dislike Rush
more than I can say, but I would much rather patiently wait for
him to stroke out than call for violence, even though that's what
he promotes. I wouldn't spit on a dog I didn't like (and I don't
like many) no less a human being.

Welcome back!
I've done some work getting Walker Bay info together for you in
anticipation of your return. Too much info to post here.
Just e-mail me.
Oh. Hope your trip went well, and welcome back!
And I agree with what you said above.
Very perceptive. I appreciate your sensitivity in judging this type
of
issue. Your legal training shines through.
Ok, enough. Don't want to appear too "gushing" in my praise.
Wouldn't be prudent.

I'm interested to know what kind of "info" you've put together that
she can't get from the Walker Bay website...or a local dealer.
This doesn't concern you, Don.
Go see if there's any beer left in the refrigerator.

Thought so!
Does you wife know you're stalking young ladies over the internet?
Get real. Common courtesy is called "stalking" in Canada?

Look...it's krueger with yet another new handle.

That explains a lot!
He's desperately phishing for Ms. Plume's e-mail address.

He's not even very good at it. He didn't say anything about my eyes.


Not fair. Once I fell into them I was struck speechless.

Larry wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote:


He's not even very good at it. He didn't say anything about my eyes.


Not fair. Once I fell into them I was struck speechless.

Too late, huh?
Ok, ok. I give up.
Not the first time a discriminating woman has rejected me.
But it was a learning experience for me.
Never thought of the eyes stuff. I usually just compliment a woman
on her legs, butt, and breast size.
Now I think I know what I was doing wrong.
No hard feelings. Er..let's forget it.
Only boats for me now.

Bill McKee wrote:
"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 21:22:10 -0700, "Bill McKee"

And why does the Richmond PD say it was random? Proof of some sort that
it
was random? What proof, or just a good way of getting out of the frypan?
and proof that the right wing lie is the truth? you wanna play
infinite regression?

Why do you flaunt your stupidity?


It's his best attribute.

Don White wrote:

That explains a lot!
He's desperately phishing for Ms. Plume's e-mail address.


I strongly advise that you don't give it to him.

Larry wrote:
Larry wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote:


He's not even very good at it. He didn't say anything about my eyes.


Not fair. Once I fell into them I was struck speechless.

Too late, huh?
Ok, ok. I give up.
Not the first time a discriminating woman has rejected me.
But it was a learning experience for me.
Never thought of the eyes stuff. I usually just compliment a woman
on her legs, butt, and breast size.
Now I think I know what I was doing wrong.
No hard feelings. Er..let's forget it.
Only boats for me now.


Forgot. I sent all the Walker Bay info to Cannuck. You can e-mail him
to get it. He's a great conversationalist too.
Just don't let him talk more than 3 seconds, as he tends to repeat himself.

In article ,
says...

nom=de=plume wrote:

snip

Doesn't matter if the person is on the right or
the left of a debate. There's no excuse for threatening violence.

Then you must have disdain for hk. Oh, that's right, he just "wishes"
ill will to those that disagree with him.

No, no... He has stalked and driven folks from the group too...

Scotty

--
For a great time, go here first... http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v

Larry wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote:
"thunder" wrote in message
t...
On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 12:47:50 -0700, Frogwatch wrote:


Evidence (proof) the left is not just violent but ULTRA-violent:
Stalin,
Mao, Pol Pot, Castro, Che, Shining Path, Bill Ayers plot to kill 20
million Americans, etc.
LOL, Communists all. Historically, however, I'd point out that
Democracies are immune to communism. There are very few, perhaps
three,
democracies that have been overthrown by communists, or from the left,
for that matter. Fascism, on the other hand, had been the death of
many,
many, democracies.

Here's a question for you, which country has overthrown more
democracies,
the USSR, or the USA? When you answer that, you may want to consider
which is the more violent, the left or the right.


It's sad that some people are unable to understand things in a
historical perspective to the point of making threats and causing
violence. If there's anything that scares me more than the threats
against our elected officials more, I can't think of it. Doesn't
matter if the person is on the right or the left of a debate. There's
no excuse for threatening violence. Comments like baby killer, and
time to reload, and spitting on people, and yelling expletives have
no place in our society. I vehemently disagree with the hubris of
Stupak, but to wish him dead? I dislike Rush more than I can say, but
I would much rather patiently wait for him to stroke out than call
for violence, even though that's what he promotes. I wouldn't spit on
a dog I didn't like (and I don't like many) no less a human being.


Welcome back!
I've done some work getting Walker Bay info together for you in
anticipation of your return. Too much info to post here.
Just e-mail me.
Oh. Hope your trip went well, and welcome back!
And I agree with what you said above.
Very perceptive. I appreciate your sensitivity in judging this type of
issue. Your legal training shines through.
Ok, enough. Don't want to appear too "gushing" in my praise.
Wouldn't be prudent.

I wish I had a better stalker than this one.

Larry