Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,163
Default Obama and the SEIU want to nationalize your 401K

On Mar 26, 3:09*pm, jps wrote:
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:55:36 -0400, bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:10:11 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:


Now they have taken over health care, their next target will be to
nationalize your 401K.


too late. wall street and the bush mafia already stole it.


Some of you may remember that right after the
election I said they would do this because ti is the only available
pool of money. *What they are proposing is a mandatory contribution by
employees into a govt managed retirement program. *Basically, this is
a way to take the money you are currently investing in a 401K and
replace it with worthless T-bills backed by govt debt.


gee is this like the program bush proposed to dump social security and
make people contribute to lehman bros, goldman sachs, etc?


how'd those firms do last year?


One of them was very successful at skimming suckers.

Heard their bonuses are destined to be just as fat as last year.

Scum.


Typical of bpuharic to not be able to understand that "voluntary"
means "not required". See bpuharic, nobody was going to "make"
anybody send any of their SS money anywhere. Whaddaya 'spect from the
"reality challenged" party.
  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,106
Default Obama and the SEIU want to nationalize your 401K

On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:35:40 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

On Mar 26, 3:09*pm, jps wrote:
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:55:36 -0400, bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:10:11 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:


Now they have taken over health care, their next target will be to
nationalize your 401K.


too late. wall street and the bush mafia already stole it.


Some of you may remember that right after the
election I said they would do this because ti is the only available
pool of money. *What they are proposing is a mandatory contribution by
employees into a govt managed retirement program. *Basically, this is
a way to take the money you are currently investing in a 401K and
replace it with worthless T-bills backed by govt debt.


gee is this like the program bush proposed to dump social security and
make people contribute to lehman bros, goldman sachs, etc?


how'd those firms do last year?


One of them was very successful at skimming suckers.

Heard their bonuses are destined to be just as fat as last year.

Scum.


Typical of bpuharic to not be able to understand that "voluntary"
means "not required". See bpuharic, nobody was going to "make"
anybody send any of their SS money anywhere. Whaddaya 'spect from the
"reality challenged" party.


sure they were. that was the whole point of the plan

guess you right whiners dont even know what you're in favor of.


  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
jps jps is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,720
Default Obama and the SEIU want to nationalize your 401K

On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:35:40 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

On Mar 26, 3:09*pm, jps wrote:
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:55:36 -0400, bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:10:11 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:


Now they have taken over health care, their next target will be to
nationalize your 401K.


too late. wall street and the bush mafia already stole it.


Some of you may remember that right after the
election I said they would do this because ti is the only available
pool of money. *What they are proposing is a mandatory contribution by
employees into a govt managed retirement program. *Basically, this is
a way to take the money you are currently investing in a 401K and
replace it with worthless T-bills backed by govt debt.


gee is this like the program bush proposed to dump social security and
make people contribute to lehman bros, goldman sachs, etc?


how'd those firms do last year?


One of them was very successful at skimming suckers.

Heard their bonuses are destined to be just as fat as last year.

Scum.


Typical of bpuharic to not be able to understand that "voluntary"
means "not required". See bpuharic, nobody was going to "make"
anybody send any of their SS money anywhere. Whaddaya 'spect from the
"reality challenged" party.


Jackass, how much of your tax money (if you had taxable income) was
dedicated to proping up Goldman and the rest so they could profit
handsomely?

I guess you're not a taxpayer?
  #4   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,596
Default Obama and the SEIU want to nationalize your 401K

On 26/03/2010 8:59 PM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:35:40 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

On Mar 26, 3:09 pm, wrote:
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:55:36 -0400, wrote:
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:10:11 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

Now they have taken over health care, their next target will be to
nationalize your 401K.

too late. wall street and the bush mafia already stole it.

Some of you may remember that right after the
election I said they would do this because ti is the only available
pool of money. What they are proposing is a mandatory contribution by
employees into a govt managed retirement program. Basically, this is
a way to take the money you are currently investing in a 401K and
replace it with worthless T-bills backed by govt debt.

gee is this like the program bush proposed to dump social security and
make people contribute to lehman bros, goldman sachs, etc?

how'd those firms do last year?

One of them was very successful at skimming suckers.

Heard their bonuses are destined to be just as fat as last year.

Scum.


Typical of bpuharic to not be able to understand that "voluntary"
means "not required". See bpuharic, nobody was going to "make"
anybody send any of their SS money anywhere. Whaddaya 'spect from the
"reality challenged" party.


Jackass, how much of your tax money (if you had taxable income) was
dedicated to proping up Goldman and the rest so they could profit
handsomely?

I guess you're not a taxpayer?


Probably isn't a taxpaer. Liberals are looking for handouts, not hand ups.

--
--------------
Politicians don't provide anything, the tax payers do.
  #5   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,222
Default Obama and the SEIU want to nationalize your 401K

On Mar 27, 9:48*am, Canuck57 wrote:
On 26/03/2010 8:59 PM, jps wrote:





On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:35:40 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
*wrote:


On Mar 26, 3:09 pm, *wrote:
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:55:36 -0400, *wrote:
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:10:11 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
*wrote:


Now they have taken over health care, their next target will be to
nationalize your 401K.


too late. wall street and the bush mafia already stole it.


Some of you may remember that right after the
election I said they would do this because ti is the only available
pool of money. *What they are proposing is a mandatory contribution by
employees into a govt managed retirement program. *Basically, this is
a way to take the money you are currently investing in a 401K and
replace it with worthless T-bills backed by govt debt.


gee is this like the program bush proposed to dump social security and
make people contribute to lehman bros, goldman sachs, etc?


how'd those firms do last year?


One of them was very successful at skimming suckers.


Heard their bonuses are destined to be just as fat as last year.


Scum.


Typical of bpuharic to not be able to understand that "voluntary"
means "not required". *See bpuharic, nobody was going to "make"
anybody send any of their SS money anywhere. *Whaddaya 'spect from the
"reality challenged" party.


Jackass, how much of your tax money (if you had taxable income) was
dedicated to proping up Goldman and the rest so they could profit
handsomely?


I guess you're not a taxpayer?


Probably isn't a taxpaer. *Liberals are looking for handouts, not hand ups.

--
--------------
Politicians don't provide anything, the tax payers do.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Again, sounding more narrow minded by the minute. I'm fairly liberal,
and have never looked "for handouts". I work my ass off, make a pretty
damned good wage, pay taxes and lifes good.


  #6   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,106
Default Obama and the SEIU want to nationalize your 401K

On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 07:48:24 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:



Probably isn't a taxpaer. Liberals are looking for handouts, not hand ups.


biggest right whiners? the rich

biggest recipients of handouts?

the rich

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Obama can't seem to get anything right. Harry[_2_] General 18 February 9th 10 02:03 AM
SEIU CalifBill General 10 December 15th 08 01:37 PM
Hey, Obama! Ban THIS! Wilbur Hubbard[_2_] ASA 3 December 5th 08 03:32 PM
Obama and your Wallet - Was: What is 200 + 77? Answer:President Obama SilentOtto General 3 November 9th 08 10:29 PM
Obama and your Wallet - Was: What is 200 + 77? Answer: President Obama Joe[_5_] General 21 November 9th 08 10:16 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:04 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017