Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 26, 3:09*pm, jps wrote:
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:55:36 -0400, bpuharic wrote: On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:10:11 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Now they have taken over health care, their next target will be to nationalize your 401K. too late. wall street and the bush mafia already stole it. Some of you may remember that right after the election I said they would do this because ti is the only available pool of money. *What they are proposing is a mandatory contribution by employees into a govt managed retirement program. *Basically, this is a way to take the money you are currently investing in a 401K and replace it with worthless T-bills backed by govt debt. gee is this like the program bush proposed to dump social security and make people contribute to lehman bros, goldman sachs, etc? how'd those firms do last year? One of them was very successful at skimming suckers. Heard their bonuses are destined to be just as fat as last year. Scum. Typical of bpuharic to not be able to understand that "voluntary" means "not required". See bpuharic, nobody was going to "make" anybody send any of their SS money anywhere. Whaddaya 'spect from the "reality challenged" party. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:35:40 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote: On Mar 26, 3:09*pm, jps wrote: On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:55:36 -0400, bpuharic wrote: On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:10:11 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Now they have taken over health care, their next target will be to nationalize your 401K. too late. wall street and the bush mafia already stole it. Some of you may remember that right after the election I said they would do this because ti is the only available pool of money. *What they are proposing is a mandatory contribution by employees into a govt managed retirement program. *Basically, this is a way to take the money you are currently investing in a 401K and replace it with worthless T-bills backed by govt debt. gee is this like the program bush proposed to dump social security and make people contribute to lehman bros, goldman sachs, etc? how'd those firms do last year? One of them was very successful at skimming suckers. Heard their bonuses are destined to be just as fat as last year. Scum. Typical of bpuharic to not be able to understand that "voluntary" means "not required". See bpuharic, nobody was going to "make" anybody send any of their SS money anywhere. Whaddaya 'spect from the "reality challenged" party. sure they were. that was the whole point of the plan guess you right whiners dont even know what you're in favor of. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:35:40 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote: On Mar 26, 3:09*pm, jps wrote: On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:55:36 -0400, bpuharic wrote: On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:10:11 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Now they have taken over health care, their next target will be to nationalize your 401K. too late. wall street and the bush mafia already stole it. Some of you may remember that right after the election I said they would do this because ti is the only available pool of money. *What they are proposing is a mandatory contribution by employees into a govt managed retirement program. *Basically, this is a way to take the money you are currently investing in a 401K and replace it with worthless T-bills backed by govt debt. gee is this like the program bush proposed to dump social security and make people contribute to lehman bros, goldman sachs, etc? how'd those firms do last year? One of them was very successful at skimming suckers. Heard their bonuses are destined to be just as fat as last year. Scum. Typical of bpuharic to not be able to understand that "voluntary" means "not required". See bpuharic, nobody was going to "make" anybody send any of their SS money anywhere. Whaddaya 'spect from the "reality challenged" party. Jackass, how much of your tax money (if you had taxable income) was dedicated to proping up Goldman and the rest so they could profit handsomely? I guess you're not a taxpayer? |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 26/03/2010 8:59 PM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:35:40 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: On Mar 26, 3:09 pm, wrote: On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:55:36 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:10:11 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Now they have taken over health care, their next target will be to nationalize your 401K. too late. wall street and the bush mafia already stole it. Some of you may remember that right after the election I said they would do this because ti is the only available pool of money. What they are proposing is a mandatory contribution by employees into a govt managed retirement program. Basically, this is a way to take the money you are currently investing in a 401K and replace it with worthless T-bills backed by govt debt. gee is this like the program bush proposed to dump social security and make people contribute to lehman bros, goldman sachs, etc? how'd those firms do last year? One of them was very successful at skimming suckers. Heard their bonuses are destined to be just as fat as last year. Scum. Typical of bpuharic to not be able to understand that "voluntary" means "not required". See bpuharic, nobody was going to "make" anybody send any of their SS money anywhere. Whaddaya 'spect from the "reality challenged" party. Jackass, how much of your tax money (if you had taxable income) was dedicated to proping up Goldman and the rest so they could profit handsomely? I guess you're not a taxpayer? Probably isn't a taxpaer. Liberals are looking for handouts, not hand ups. -- -------------- Politicians don't provide anything, the tax payers do. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 27, 9:48*am, Canuck57 wrote:
On 26/03/2010 8:59 PM, jps wrote: On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:35:40 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch *wrote: On Mar 26, 3:09 pm, *wrote: On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:55:36 -0400, *wrote: On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:10:11 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch *wrote: Now they have taken over health care, their next target will be to nationalize your 401K. too late. wall street and the bush mafia already stole it. Some of you may remember that right after the election I said they would do this because ti is the only available pool of money. *What they are proposing is a mandatory contribution by employees into a govt managed retirement program. *Basically, this is a way to take the money you are currently investing in a 401K and replace it with worthless T-bills backed by govt debt. gee is this like the program bush proposed to dump social security and make people contribute to lehman bros, goldman sachs, etc? how'd those firms do last year? One of them was very successful at skimming suckers. Heard their bonuses are destined to be just as fat as last year. Scum. Typical of bpuharic to not be able to understand that "voluntary" means "not required". *See bpuharic, nobody was going to "make" anybody send any of their SS money anywhere. *Whaddaya 'spect from the "reality challenged" party. Jackass, how much of your tax money (if you had taxable income) was dedicated to proping up Goldman and the rest so they could profit handsomely? I guess you're not a taxpayer? Probably isn't a taxpaer. *Liberals are looking for handouts, not hand ups. -- -------------- Politicians don't provide anything, the tax payers do.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Again, sounding more narrow minded by the minute. I'm fairly liberal, and have never looked "for handouts". I work my ass off, make a pretty damned good wage, pay taxes and lifes good. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 07:48:24 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: Probably isn't a taxpaer. Liberals are looking for handouts, not hand ups. biggest right whiners? the rich biggest recipients of handouts? the rich |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Obama can't seem to get anything right. | General | |||
SEIU | General | |||
Hey, Obama! Ban THIS! | ASA | |||
Obama and your Wallet - Was: What is 200 + 77? Answer:President Obama | General | |||
Obama and your Wallet - Was: What is 200 + 77? Answer: President Obama | General |