nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...

nom=de=plume wrote:

"Bill wrote in message
...


wrote in message
...


"Bill wrote in message
m...


wrote in message
...


"Bill wrote in message
m...


wrote in message
...


"Bill wrote in message
m...


wrote in message
...


wrote in message
...


nom=de=plume wrote:


"Bill wrote in message
m...



wrote in message
...



On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:45:52 -0600, Frogloogyherringsnacks
wrote:





Naw. Jest cracker talk from them's too scared of a black
man
being
Prez. Like I said, we colored folk fish too.
You ain't said nothin but scare talk. Nothin. Not a damn
detail.
Why's that, peckerwood?



yeah it's amazing. a rich white guy destroys the economy and
the
middle class

and they blame it on the darkie president



You sound really stupid and you probably are. Obama has over
spent more
in the last year than Bush did in 4 years. And Obama's next
budget is
coming in with a $1.4 trillion deficit amount. He is
Proposing
over
spending more in the next 10 years, that every President,
including Bush
II, has overspent total! My new granddaughter is due
tomorrow.
She will
enter the world with a $74,000 debt burden. And you want no
pain due to
the overspending by both Dem's and Republican's you have voted
for. We
all deserve a severe beating for letting our elected
representatives,
especially the present ones who are setting records, over
spend.
We
should revolt at the idea they can screw the people and then
get
full pay
for the rest of their lives. We need to hold their feet to
the
fire to
both stop spending like drunken sailors and get rid of
pensions
that
reward them as if they were royalty.




As usual, you're just wrong....

http://www.forbes.com/2009/01/19/oba...19hassett.html





That report is 14 months old.




Ok. Produce something more recent. Bush was much worse and ruined
the economy, but it's Obama's fault, right?

--
Nom=de=Plume



Bush screwed the economy. You are somewhat correct. Throw in
both
a Republican and Democrat Controlled Congress and you got it more
correct. But Obama knew the problems coming in. He has screwed it
up royally. His spending is out of control, not helping and laying
the groundwork for a huge crash. Make 1929 look good, maybe.



"Obama knew the problems coming in." Yet, his actions didn't take
effect until he was well into the position, and the results when
they
did have been a slowing of the job loss, a stablization of the
economy, and he's on track to save billions if not trillions. But,
of
course the Republicans have a plan... the status quo. To hell with
getting the spending under control in a meaningful way, reform the
financial system, reform the healthcare system, reform the school
system. Just say no!

Keep flailing away. I'm sure someone out there is listening.

--
Nom=de=Plume



The only reason the layoffs are slowing is at least 20% of the
workforce is out of work. Lots of the working at underemployed.
How
did that bank bailout help? Stopped foreclosures? Helped in loan
liquidity?


Really? The only reason. And you know this because you have some
inside
information? Or, more likely, you're listening to someone's talking
point.

--
Nom=de=Plume



Nope, I have an analytical brain. You have a brain?



So far, you haven't shown it in public.

--
Nom=de=Plume



And another brainless comment by nom-de-dum


And another demonstration of your lack of ability to cite facts.



You cite old news and incite other people with a lot of BS (cookie?).
Care to try to post on-topic once a day, at least?




Feel free to do the same. I cited an article but you have nothing to say
except it's old. Too bad for you!


Old *and* irrelevant. You should read these article _before_ you post them.

"Larry" wrote in message
news
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...

nom=de=plume wrote:

"Bill wrote in message
...


wrote in message
...


"Bill wrote in message
m...


wrote in message
...


"Bill wrote in message
m...


wrote in message
...


"Bill wrote in message
m...


wrote in message
...


wrote in message
...


nom=de=plume wrote:


"Bill wrote in message
m...



wrote in message
...



On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:45:52 -0600, Frogloogyherringsnacks
wrote:





Naw. Jest cracker talk from them's too scared of a black
man
being
Prez. Like I said, we colored folk fish too.
You ain't said nothin but scare talk. Nothin. Not a damn
detail.
Why's that, peckerwood?



yeah it's amazing. a rich white guy destroys the economy
and
the
middle class

and they blame it on the darkie president



You sound really stupid and you probably are. Obama has
over
spent more
in the last year than Bush did in 4 years. And Obama's next
budget is
coming in with a $1.4 trillion deficit amount. He is
Proposing
over
spending more in the next 10 years, that every President,
including Bush
II, has overspent total! My new granddaughter is due
tomorrow.
She will
enter the world with a $74,000 debt burden. And you want no
pain due to
the overspending by both Dem's and Republican's you have
voted
for. We
all deserve a severe beating for letting our elected
representatives,
especially the present ones who are setting records, over
spend.
We
should revolt at the idea they can screw the people and then
get
full pay
for the rest of their lives. We need to hold their feet to
the
fire to
both stop spending like drunken sailors and get rid of
pensions
that
reward them as if they were royalty.




As usual, you're just wrong....

http://www.forbes.com/2009/01/19/oba...19hassett.html





That report is 14 months old.




Ok. Produce something more recent. Bush was much worse and
ruined
the economy, but it's Obama's fault, right?

--
Nom=de=Plume



Bush screwed the economy. You are somewhat correct. Throw in
both
a Republican and Democrat Controlled Congress and you got it
more
correct. But Obama knew the problems coming in. He has screwed
it
up royally. His spending is out of control, not helping and
laying
the groundwork for a huge crash. Make 1929 look good, maybe.



"Obama knew the problems coming in." Yet, his actions didn't take
effect until he was well into the position, and the results when
they
did have been a slowing of the job loss, a stablization of the
economy, and he's on track to save billions if not trillions.
But,
of
course the Republicans have a plan... the status quo. To hell
with
getting the spending under control in a meaningful way, reform
the
financial system, reform the healthcare system, reform the school
system. Just say no!

Keep flailing away. I'm sure someone out there is listening.

--
Nom=de=Plume



The only reason the layoffs are slowing is at least 20% of the
workforce is out of work. Lots of the working at underemployed.
How
did that bank bailout help? Stopped foreclosures? Helped in loan
liquidity?


Really? The only reason. And you know this because you have some
inside
information? Or, more likely, you're listening to someone's talking
point.

--
Nom=de=Plume



Nope, I have an analytical brain. You have a brain?



So far, you haven't shown it in public.

--
Nom=de=Plume



And another brainless comment by nom-de-dum


And another demonstration of your lack of ability to cite facts.



You cite old news and incite other people with a lot of BS (cookie?).
Care to try to post on-topic once a day, at least?




Feel free to do the same. I cited an article but you have nothing to say
except it's old. Too bad for you!


Old *and* irrelevant. You should read these article _before_ you post
them.


You should read them and understand them before you comment on them... if
that's possible for you.

--
Nom=de=Plume

nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
news
nom=de=plume wrote:

wrote in message
...


nom=de=plume wrote:


"Bill wrote in message
...



wrote in message
...



"Bill wrote in message
m...



wrote in message
...



"Bill wrote in message
m...



wrote in message
...



"Bill wrote in message
m...



wrote in message
...



wrote in message
...



nom=de=plume wrote:



"Bill wrote in message
m...




wrote in message
...




On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:45:52 -0600, Frogloogyherringsnacks
wrote:






Naw. Jest cracker talk from them's too scared of a black
man
being
Prez. Like I said, we colored folk fish too.
You ain't said nothin but scare talk. Nothin. Not a damn
detail.
Why's that, peckerwood?




yeah it's amazing. a rich white guy destroys the economy
and
the
middle class

and they blame it on the darkie president




You sound really stupid and you probably are. Obama has
over
spent more
in the last year than Bush did in 4 years. And Obama's next
budget is
coming in with a $1.4 trillion deficit amount. He is
Proposing
over
spending more in the next 10 years, that every President,
including Bush
II, has overspent total! My new granddaughter is due
tomorrow.
She will
enter the world with a $74,000 debt burden. And you want no
pain due to
the overspending by both Dem's and Republican's you have
voted
for. We
all deserve a severe beating for letting our elected
representatives,
especially the present ones who are setting records, over
spend.
We
should revolt at the idea they can screw the people and then
get
full pay
for the rest of their lives. We need to hold their feet to
the
fire to
both stop spending like drunken sailors and get rid of
pensions
that
reward them as if they were royalty.





As usual, you're just wrong....

http://www.forbes.com/2009/01/19/oba...19hassett.html






That report is 14 months old.





Ok. Produce something more recent. Bush was much worse and
ruined
the economy, but it's Obama's fault, right?

--
Nom=de=Plume




Bush screwed the economy. You are somewhat correct. Throw in
both
a Republican and Democrat Controlled Congress and you got it
more
correct. But Obama knew the problems coming in. He has screwed
it
up royally. His spending is out of control, not helping and
laying
the groundwork for a huge crash. Make 1929 look good, maybe.




"Obama knew the problems coming in." Yet, his actions didn't take
effect until he was well into the position, and the results when
they
did have been a slowing of the job loss, a stablization of the
economy, and he's on track to save billions if not trillions.
But,
of
course the Republicans have a plan... the status quo. To hell
with
getting the spending under control in a meaningful way, reform
the
financial system, reform the healthcare system, reform the school
system. Just say no!

Keep flailing away. I'm sure someone out there is listening.

--
Nom=de=Plume




The only reason the layoffs are slowing is at least 20% of the
workforce is out of work. Lots of the working at underemployed.
How
did that bank bailout help? Stopped foreclosures? Helped in loan
liquidity?



Really? The only reason. And you know this because you have some
inside
information? Or, more likely, you're listening to someone's talking
point.

--
Nom=de=Plume




Nope, I have an analytical brain. You have a brain?




So far, you haven't shown it in public.

--
Nom=de=Plume




And another brainless comment by nom-de-dum



And another demonstration of your lack of ability to cite facts.




You cite old news and incite other people with a lot of BS (cookie?).
Care to try to post on-topic once a day, at least?




Feel free to do the same. I cited an article but you have nothing to say
except it's old. Too bad for you!



Old *and* irrelevant. You should read these article _before_ you post
them.


You should read them and understand them before you comment on them... if
that's possible for you.


I did and it was OLD news.

"Larry" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
news
nom=de=plume wrote:

wrote in message
...


nom=de=plume wrote:


"Bill wrote in message
...



wrote in message
...



"Bill wrote in message
m...



wrote in message
...



"Bill wrote in message
m...



wrote in message
...



"Bill wrote in message
m...



wrote in message
...



wrote in message
...



nom=de=plume wrote:



"Bill wrote in
message
m...




wrote in message
...




On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:45:52 -0600,
Frogloogyherringsnacks
wrote:






Naw. Jest cracker talk from them's too scared of a
black
man
being
Prez. Like I said, we colored folk fish too.
You ain't said nothin but scare talk. Nothin. Not a
damn
detail.
Why's that, peckerwood?




yeah it's amazing. a rich white guy destroys the economy
and
the
middle class

and they blame it on the darkie president




You sound really stupid and you probably are. Obama has
over
spent more
in the last year than Bush did in 4 years. And Obama's
next
budget is
coming in with a $1.4 trillion deficit amount. He is
Proposing
over
spending more in the next 10 years, that every President,
including Bush
II, has overspent total! My new granddaughter is due
tomorrow.
She will
enter the world with a $74,000 debt burden. And you want
no
pain due to
the overspending by both Dem's and Republican's you have
voted
for. We
all deserve a severe beating for letting our elected
representatives,
especially the present ones who are setting records, over
spend.
We
should revolt at the idea they can screw the people and
then
get
full pay
for the rest of their lives. We need to hold their feet
to
the
fire to
both stop spending like drunken sailors and get rid of
pensions
that
reward them as if they were royalty.





As usual, you're just wrong....

http://www.forbes.com/2009/01/19/oba...19hassett.html






That report is 14 months old.





Ok. Produce something more recent. Bush was much worse and
ruined
the economy, but it's Obama's fault, right?

--
Nom=de=Plume




Bush screwed the economy. You are somewhat correct. Throw in
both
a Republican and Democrat Controlled Congress and you got it
more
correct. But Obama knew the problems coming in. He has
screwed
it
up royally. His spending is out of control, not helping and
laying
the groundwork for a huge crash. Make 1929 look good, maybe.




"Obama knew the problems coming in." Yet, his actions didn't
take
effect until he was well into the position, and the results
when
they
did have been a slowing of the job loss, a stablization of the
economy, and he's on track to save billions if not trillions.
But,
of
course the Republicans have a plan... the status quo. To hell
with
getting the spending under control in a meaningful way, reform
the
financial system, reform the healthcare system, reform the
school
system. Just say no!

Keep flailing away. I'm sure someone out there is listening.

--
Nom=de=Plume




The only reason the layoffs are slowing is at least 20% of the
workforce is out of work. Lots of the working at underemployed.
How
did that bank bailout help? Stopped foreclosures? Helped in
loan
liquidity?



Really? The only reason. And you know this because you have some
inside
information? Or, more likely, you're listening to someone's
talking
point.

--
Nom=de=Plume




Nope, I have an analytical brain. You have a brain?




So far, you haven't shown it in public.

--
Nom=de=Plume




And another brainless comment by nom-de-dum



And another demonstration of your lack of ability to cite facts.




You cite old news and incite other people with a lot of BS (cookie?).
Care to try to post on-topic once a day, at least?




Feel free to do the same. I cited an article but you have nothing to
say
except it's old. Too bad for you!



Old *and* irrelevant. You should read these article _before_ you post
them.


You should read them and understand them before you comment on them... if
that's possible for you.


I did and it was OLD news.


Yet you offer nothing new... perhaps you should post something relevant or
comment on the information in detail. Or not I suppose.

--
Nom=de=Plume

nom=de=plume wrote:


Yet you offer nothing new... perhaps you should post something relevant or
comment on the information in detail. Or not I suppose.


In my short time here I have more OT posts than you by a long shot -
including your dumb questions about navigation lights.

"Larry" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:


Yet you offer nothing new... perhaps you should post something relevant
or
comment on the information in detail. Or not I suppose.


In my short time here I have more OT posts than you by a long shot -
including your dumb questions about navigation lights.


Never asked any dumb question about lights. I made several statements.
However, I have seen a lot of your dumb posts, mostly about how everyone
else is wrong but you're always right. You must be brilliant.

--
Nom=de=Plume

nom=de=plume wrote:
"Larry" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:

Yet you offer nothing new... perhaps you should post something relevant
or
comment on the information in detail. Or not I suppose.


In my short time here I have more OT posts than you by a long shot -
including your dumb questions about navigation lights.


Never asked any dumb question about lights. I made several statements.


Right!!!!! I won't filter back through your droppings to find them, but
I'm willing to bet you asked or said some pretty dumb things.

"Larry" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:


Yet you offer nothing new... perhaps you should post something relevant
or
comment on the information in detail. Or not I suppose.


In my short time here I have more OT posts than you by a long shot -
including your dumb questions about navigation lights.

I'm sure you mean On Topic. OT generally abbreviates Off Topic... around
here anyway. ;-)

--Mike

"mgg" wrote in message
...


"Larry" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:


Yet you offer nothing new... perhaps you should post something relevant
or
comment on the information in detail. Or not I suppose.


In my short time here I have more OT posts than you by a long shot -
including your dumb questions about navigation lights.

I'm sure you mean On Topic. OT generally abbreviates Off Topic... around
here anyway. ;-)

--Mike


Don't post an old link on the subject. Larry will get upset!

--
Nom=de=Plume

On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:49:26 -0700, "mgg" wrote:



"Larry" wrote in message
m...
nom=de=plume wrote:


Yet you offer nothing new... perhaps you should post something relevant
or
comment on the information in detail. Or not I suppose.


In my short time here I have more OT posts than you by a long shot -
including your dumb questions about navigation lights.

I'm sure you mean On Topic. OT generally abbreviates Off Topic... around
here anyway. ;-)

--Mike

Yup, he must have made a typo. Nincdepoop has posted over 4500 in the short time
she's been here. I think maybe three that I've seen were on topic.
--
John H

For a great time, go here first... http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v