"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Larry" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Bill wrote in message
m...

wrote in message
...

On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:45:52 -0600, Frogloogyherringsnacks
wrote:



Naw. Jest cracker talk from them's too scared of a black man being
Prez. Like I said, we colored folk fish too.
You ain't said nothin but scare talk. Nothin. Not a damn detail.
Why's that, peckerwood?

yeah it's amazing. a rich white guy destroys the economy and the
middle class

and they blame it on the darkie president

You sound really stupid and you probably are. Obama has over spent
more
in the last year than Bush did in 4 years. And Obama's next budget
is
coming in with a $1.4 trillion deficit amount. He is Proposing over
spending more in the next 10 years, that every President, including
Bush
II, has overspent total! My new granddaughter is due tomorrow. She
will
enter the world with a $74,000 debt burden. And you want no pain due
to
the overspending by both Dem's and Republican's you have voted for.
We
all deserve a severe beating for letting our elected representatives,
especially the present ones who are setting records, over spend. We
should revolt at the idea they can screw the people and then get full
pay
for the rest of their lives. We need to hold their feet to the fire
to
both stop spending like drunken sailors and get rid of pensions that
reward them as if they were royalty.



As usual, you're just wrong....

http://www.forbes.com/2009/01/19/oba...19hassett.html




That report is 14 months old.




Ok. Produce something more recent. Bush was much worse and ruined the
economy, but it's Obama's fault, right?

--
Nom=de=Plume


Bush screwed the economy. You are somewhat correct. Throw in both a
Republican and Democrat Controlled Congress and you got it more correct.
But Obama knew the problems coming in. He has screwed it up royally.
His spending is out of control, not helping and laying the groundwork for
a huge crash. Make 1929 look good, maybe.



"Obama knew the problems coming in." Yet, his actions didn't take effect
until he was well into the position, and the results when they did have
been a slowing of the job loss, a stablization of the economy, and he's on
track to save billions if not trillions. But, of course the Republicans
have a plan... the status quo. To hell with getting the spending under
control in a meaningful way, reform the financial system, reform the
healthcare system, reform the school system. Just say no!

Keep flailing away. I'm sure someone out there is listening.

--
Nom=de=Plume


The only reason the layoffs are slowing is at least 20% of the workforce is
out of work. Lots of the working at underemployed. How did that bank
bailout help? Stopped foreclosures? Helped in loan liquidity?

"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Larry" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Bill wrote in message
m...

wrote in message
...

On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:45:52 -0600, Frogloogyherringsnacks
wrote:



Naw. Jest cracker talk from them's too scared of a black man
being
Prez. Like I said, we colored folk fish too.
You ain't said nothin but scare talk. Nothin. Not a damn detail.
Why's that, peckerwood?

yeah it's amazing. a rich white guy destroys the economy and the
middle class

and they blame it on the darkie president

You sound really stupid and you probably are. Obama has over spent
more
in the last year than Bush did in 4 years. And Obama's next budget
is
coming in with a $1.4 trillion deficit amount. He is Proposing over
spending more in the next 10 years, that every President, including
Bush
II, has overspent total! My new granddaughter is due tomorrow. She
will
enter the world with a $74,000 debt burden. And you want no pain
due to
the overspending by both Dem's and Republican's you have voted for.
We
all deserve a severe beating for letting our elected
representatives,
especially the present ones who are setting records, over spend. We
should revolt at the idea they can screw the people and then get
full pay
for the rest of their lives. We need to hold their feet to the fire
to
both stop spending like drunken sailors and get rid of pensions that
reward them as if they were royalty.



As usual, you're just wrong....

http://www.forbes.com/2009/01/19/oba...19hassett.html




That report is 14 months old.




Ok. Produce something more recent. Bush was much worse and ruined the
economy, but it's Obama's fault, right?

--
Nom=de=Plume


Bush screwed the economy. You are somewhat correct. Throw in both a
Republican and Democrat Controlled Congress and you got it more
correct. But Obama knew the problems coming in. He has screwed it up
royally. His spending is out of control, not helping and laying the
groundwork for a huge crash. Make 1929 look good, maybe.



"Obama knew the problems coming in." Yet, his actions didn't take effect
until he was well into the position, and the results when they did have
been a slowing of the job loss, a stablization of the economy, and he's
on track to save billions if not trillions. But, of course the
Republicans have a plan... the status quo. To hell with getting the
spending under control in a meaningful way, reform the financial system,
reform the healthcare system, reform the school system. Just say no!

Keep flailing away. I'm sure someone out there is listening.

--
Nom=de=Plume


The only reason the layoffs are slowing is at least 20% of the workforce
is out of work. Lots of the working at underemployed. How did that bank
bailout help? Stopped foreclosures? Helped in loan liquidity?

Really? The only reason. And you know this because you have some inside
information? Or, more likely, you're listening to someone's talking point.

--
Nom=de=Plume

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Larry" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Bill wrote in message
m...

wrote in message
...

On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:45:52 -0600, Frogloogyherringsnacks
wrote:



Naw. Jest cracker talk from them's too scared of a black man
being
Prez. Like I said, we colored folk fish too.
You ain't said nothin but scare talk. Nothin. Not a damn
detail.
Why's that, peckerwood?

yeah it's amazing. a rich white guy destroys the economy and the
middle class

and they blame it on the darkie president

You sound really stupid and you probably are. Obama has over spent
more
in the last year than Bush did in 4 years. And Obama's next budget
is
coming in with a $1.4 trillion deficit amount. He is Proposing
over
spending more in the next 10 years, that every President, including
Bush
II, has overspent total! My new granddaughter is due tomorrow.
She will
enter the world with a $74,000 debt burden. And you want no pain
due to
the overspending by both Dem's and Republican's you have voted for.
We
all deserve a severe beating for letting our elected
representatives,
especially the present ones who are setting records, over spend.
We
should revolt at the idea they can screw the people and then get
full pay
for the rest of their lives. We need to hold their feet to the
fire to
both stop spending like drunken sailors and get rid of pensions
that
reward them as if they were royalty.



As usual, you're just wrong....

http://www.forbes.com/2009/01/19/oba...19hassett.html




That report is 14 months old.




Ok. Produce something more recent. Bush was much worse and ruined the
economy, but it's Obama's fault, right?

--
Nom=de=Plume


Bush screwed the economy. You are somewhat correct. Throw in both a
Republican and Democrat Controlled Congress and you got it more
correct. But Obama knew the problems coming in. He has screwed it up
royally. His spending is out of control, not helping and laying the
groundwork for a huge crash. Make 1929 look good, maybe.



"Obama knew the problems coming in." Yet, his actions didn't take effect
until he was well into the position, and the results when they did have
been a slowing of the job loss, a stablization of the economy, and he's
on track to save billions if not trillions. But, of course the
Republicans have a plan... the status quo. To hell with getting the
spending under control in a meaningful way, reform the financial system,
reform the healthcare system, reform the school system. Just say no!

Keep flailing away. I'm sure someone out there is listening.

--
Nom=de=Plume


The only reason the layoffs are slowing is at least 20% of the workforce
is out of work. Lots of the working at underemployed. How did that bank
bailout help? Stopped foreclosures? Helped in loan liquidity?

Really? The only reason. And you know this because you have some inside
information? Or, more likely, you're listening to someone's talking point.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Nope, I have an analytical brain. You have a brain?

"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Larry" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Bill wrote in message
m...

wrote in message
...

On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:45:52 -0600, Frogloogyherringsnacks
wrote:



Naw. Jest cracker talk from them's too scared of a black man
being
Prez. Like I said, we colored folk fish too.
You ain't said nothin but scare talk. Nothin. Not a damn
detail.
Why's that, peckerwood?

yeah it's amazing. a rich white guy destroys the economy and the
middle class

and they blame it on the darkie president

You sound really stupid and you probably are. Obama has over
spent more
in the last year than Bush did in 4 years. And Obama's next
budget is
coming in with a $1.4 trillion deficit amount. He is Proposing
over
spending more in the next 10 years, that every President,
including Bush
II, has overspent total! My new granddaughter is due tomorrow.
She will
enter the world with a $74,000 debt burden. And you want no pain
due to
the overspending by both Dem's and Republican's you have voted
for. We
all deserve a severe beating for letting our elected
representatives,
especially the present ones who are setting records, over spend.
We
should revolt at the idea they can screw the people and then get
full pay
for the rest of their lives. We need to hold their feet to the
fire to
both stop spending like drunken sailors and get rid of pensions
that
reward them as if they were royalty.



As usual, you're just wrong....

http://www.forbes.com/2009/01/19/oba...19hassett.html




That report is 14 months old.




Ok. Produce something more recent. Bush was much worse and ruined the
economy, but it's Obama's fault, right?

--
Nom=de=Plume


Bush screwed the economy. You are somewhat correct. Throw in both a
Republican and Democrat Controlled Congress and you got it more
correct. But Obama knew the problems coming in. He has screwed it up
royally. His spending is out of control, not helping and laying the
groundwork for a huge crash. Make 1929 look good, maybe.



"Obama knew the problems coming in." Yet, his actions didn't take
effect until he was well into the position, and the results when they
did have been a slowing of the job loss, a stablization of the economy,
and he's on track to save billions if not trillions. But, of course the
Republicans have a plan... the status quo. To hell with getting the
spending under control in a meaningful way, reform the financial
system, reform the healthcare system, reform the school system. Just
say no!

Keep flailing away. I'm sure someone out there is listening.

--
Nom=de=Plume


The only reason the layoffs are slowing is at least 20% of the
workforce is out of work. Lots of the working at underemployed. How
did that bank bailout help? Stopped foreclosures? Helped in loan
liquidity?

Really? The only reason. And you know this because you have some inside
information? Or, more likely, you're listening to someone's talking
point.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Nope, I have an analytical brain. You have a brain?



So far, you haven't shown it in public.

--
Nom=de=Plume

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Larry" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Bill wrote in message
m...

wrote in message
...

On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:45:52 -0600, Frogloogyherringsnacks
wrote:



Naw. Jest cracker talk from them's too scared of a black man
being
Prez. Like I said, we colored folk fish too.
You ain't said nothin but scare talk. Nothin. Not a damn
detail.
Why's that, peckerwood?

yeah it's amazing. a rich white guy destroys the economy and the
middle class

and they blame it on the darkie president

You sound really stupid and you probably are. Obama has over
spent more
in the last year than Bush did in 4 years. And Obama's next
budget is
coming in with a $1.4 trillion deficit amount. He is Proposing
over
spending more in the next 10 years, that every President,
including Bush
II, has overspent total! My new granddaughter is due tomorrow.
She will
enter the world with a $74,000 debt burden. And you want no pain
due to
the overspending by both Dem's and Republican's you have voted
for. We
all deserve a severe beating for letting our elected
representatives,
especially the present ones who are setting records, over spend.
We
should revolt at the idea they can screw the people and then get
full pay
for the rest of their lives. We need to hold their feet to the
fire to
both stop spending like drunken sailors and get rid of pensions
that
reward them as if they were royalty.



As usual, you're just wrong....

http://www.forbes.com/2009/01/19/oba...19hassett.html




That report is 14 months old.




Ok. Produce something more recent. Bush was much worse and ruined
the economy, but it's Obama's fault, right?

--
Nom=de=Plume


Bush screwed the economy. You are somewhat correct. Throw in both a
Republican and Democrat Controlled Congress and you got it more
correct. But Obama knew the problems coming in. He has screwed it up
royally. His spending is out of control, not helping and laying the
groundwork for a huge crash. Make 1929 look good, maybe.



"Obama knew the problems coming in." Yet, his actions didn't take
effect until he was well into the position, and the results when they
did have been a slowing of the job loss, a stablization of the
economy, and he's on track to save billions if not trillions. But, of
course the Republicans have a plan... the status quo. To hell with
getting the spending under control in a meaningful way, reform the
financial system, reform the healthcare system, reform the school
system. Just say no!

Keep flailing away. I'm sure someone out there is listening.

--
Nom=de=Plume


The only reason the layoffs are slowing is at least 20% of the
workforce is out of work. Lots of the working at underemployed. How
did that bank bailout help? Stopped foreclosures? Helped in loan
liquidity?

Really? The only reason. And you know this because you have some inside
information? Or, more likely, you're listening to someone's talking
point.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Nope, I have an analytical brain. You have a brain?



So far, you haven't shown it in public.

--
Nom=de=Plume


And another brainless comment by nom-de-dum

"Bill McKee" wrote in message
...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Larry" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Bill wrote in message
m...

wrote in message
...

On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:45:52 -0600, Frogloogyherringsnacks
wrote:



Naw. Jest cracker talk from them's too scared of a black man
being
Prez. Like I said, we colored folk fish too.
You ain't said nothin but scare talk. Nothin. Not a damn
detail.
Why's that, peckerwood?

yeah it's amazing. a rich white guy destroys the economy and
the
middle class

and they blame it on the darkie president

You sound really stupid and you probably are. Obama has over
spent more
in the last year than Bush did in 4 years. And Obama's next
budget is
coming in with a $1.4 trillion deficit amount. He is Proposing
over
spending more in the next 10 years, that every President,
including Bush
II, has overspent total! My new granddaughter is due tomorrow.
She will
enter the world with a $74,000 debt burden. And you want no
pain due to
the overspending by both Dem's and Republican's you have voted
for. We
all deserve a severe beating for letting our elected
representatives,
especially the present ones who are setting records, over spend.
We
should revolt at the idea they can screw the people and then get
full pay
for the rest of their lives. We need to hold their feet to the
fire to
both stop spending like drunken sailors and get rid of pensions
that
reward them as if they were royalty.



As usual, you're just wrong....

http://www.forbes.com/2009/01/19/oba...19hassett.html




That report is 14 months old.




Ok. Produce something more recent. Bush was much worse and ruined
the economy, but it's Obama's fault, right?

--
Nom=de=Plume


Bush screwed the economy. You are somewhat correct. Throw in both
a Republican and Democrat Controlled Congress and you got it more
correct. But Obama knew the problems coming in. He has screwed it
up royally. His spending is out of control, not helping and laying
the groundwork for a huge crash. Make 1929 look good, maybe.



"Obama knew the problems coming in." Yet, his actions didn't take
effect until he was well into the position, and the results when they
did have been a slowing of the job loss, a stablization of the
economy, and he's on track to save billions if not trillions. But, of
course the Republicans have a plan... the status quo. To hell with
getting the spending under control in a meaningful way, reform the
financial system, reform the healthcare system, reform the school
system. Just say no!

Keep flailing away. I'm sure someone out there is listening.

--
Nom=de=Plume


The only reason the layoffs are slowing is at least 20% of the
workforce is out of work. Lots of the working at underemployed. How
did that bank bailout help? Stopped foreclosures? Helped in loan
liquidity?

Really? The only reason. And you know this because you have some inside
information? Or, more likely, you're listening to someone's talking
point.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Nope, I have an analytical brain. You have a brain?



So far, you haven't shown it in public.

--
Nom=de=Plume


And another brainless comment by nom-de-dum

And another demonstration of your lack of ability to cite facts.

--
Nom=de=Plume

nom=de=plume wrote:
"Bill wrote in message
...

wrote in message
...

"Bill wrote in message
m...

wrote in message
...

"Bill wrote in message
m...

wrote in message
...

"Bill wrote in message
m...

wrote in message
...

wrote in message
...

nom=de=plume wrote:

"Bill wrote in message
m...


wrote in message
...


On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:45:52 -0600, Frogloogyherringsnacks
wrote:




Naw. Jest cracker talk from them's too scared of a black man
being
Prez. Like I said, we colored folk fish too.
You ain't said nothin but scare talk. Nothin. Not a damn
detail.
Why's that, peckerwood?


yeah it's amazing. a rich white guy destroys the economy and
the
middle class

and they blame it on the darkie president


You sound really stupid and you probably are. Obama has over
spent more
in the last year than Bush did in 4 years. And Obama's next
budget is
coming in with a $1.4 trillion deficit amount. He is Proposing
over
spending more in the next 10 years, that every President,
including Bush
II, has overspent total! My new granddaughter is due tomorrow.
She will
enter the world with a $74,000 debt burden. And you want no
pain due to
the overspending by both Dem's and Republican's you have voted
for. We
all deserve a severe beating for letting our elected
representatives,
especially the present ones who are setting records, over spend.
We
should revolt at the idea they can screw the people and then get
full pay
for the rest of their lives. We need to hold their feet to the
fire to
both stop spending like drunken sailors and get rid of pensions
that
reward them as if they were royalty.



As usual, you're just wrong....

http://www.forbes.com/2009/01/19/oba...19hassett.html




That report is 14 months old.




Ok. Produce something more recent. Bush was much worse and ruined
the economy, but it's Obama's fault, right?

--
Nom=de=Plume


Bush screwed the economy. You are somewhat correct. Throw in both
a Republican and Democrat Controlled Congress and you got it more
correct. But Obama knew the problems coming in. He has screwed it
up royally. His spending is out of control, not helping and laying
the groundwork for a huge crash. Make 1929 look good, maybe.



"Obama knew the problems coming in." Yet, his actions didn't take
effect until he was well into the position, and the results when they
did have been a slowing of the job loss, a stablization of the
economy, and he's on track to save billions if not trillions. But, of
course the Republicans have a plan... the status quo. To hell with
getting the spending under control in a meaningful way, reform the
financial system, reform the healthcare system, reform the school
system. Just say no!

Keep flailing away. I'm sure someone out there is listening.

--
Nom=de=Plume


The only reason the layoffs are slowing is at least 20% of the
workforce is out of work. Lots of the working at underemployed. How
did that bank bailout help? Stopped foreclosures? Helped in loan
liquidity?

Really? The only reason. And you know this because you have some inside
information? Or, more likely, you're listening to someone's talking
point.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Nope, I have an analytical brain. You have a brain?



So far, you haven't shown it in public.

--
Nom=de=Plume


And another brainless comment by nom-de-dum

And another demonstration of your lack of ability to cite facts.


You cite old news and incite other people with a lot of BS (cookie?).
Care to try to post on-topic once a day, at least?