"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 21:44:12 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...


So, when a group makes an error and admits it, that means it's ok for
the
group that perpetrated the hoax to get off the hook.


Quoting from Wiki:

The Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 is a United States Congressional
statement
of policy calling for regime change in Iraq.[ It was signed into law by
President Bill Clinton.

The Act found that between 1980 and 1998 Iraq had:

1.. committed various and significant violations of International Law,
2.. had failed to comply with the obligations to which it had agreed
following the Gulf War and
3.. further had ignored Resolutions of the United Nations Security
Council.
"He will then conclude that he can go right on and do more to rebuild an
arsenal of devastating destruction. And some day, some way, I guarantee
you
he'll use the arsenal.... President Clinton ~ 1998"

Bush lied?

yeah. because he was president AFTER clinton

and he had evidence...which he disregarded...that there were NO WMD's
in iraq.

clinton sent ZERO troops into iraq.

you right wingers....so let's summarize what you believe:

-obama's been president for 9 years
-clinton invaded iraq

amazing what you'll believe


*I* believe that it's time for most of you lefties to pull your head out
of the sand
and get a eyeful of reality.

Obama is.

Eisboch



Basically, you have no argument other than "it was Clinton's fault." Keep
trying.


I made no such argument. All I did was quote Wiki as to the origins of US
policy for regime change in Iraq. It did not start with Bush. He just
happened to carry out the unanimously approved policy by the Senate and
signed by his predecessor, Bill Clinton.

Eisboch

In article ,
says...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 21:44:12 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...


So, when a group makes an error and admits it, that means it's ok for
the
group that perpetrated the hoax to get off the hook.


Quoting from Wiki:

The Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 is a United States Congressional
statement
of policy calling for regime change in Iraq.[ It was signed into law by
President Bill Clinton.

The Act found that between 1980 and 1998 Iraq had:

1.. committed various and significant violations of International Law,
2.. had failed to comply with the obligations to which it had agreed
following the Gulf War and
3.. further had ignored Resolutions of the United Nations Security
Council.
"He will then conclude that he can go right on and do more to rebuild an
arsenal of devastating destruction. And some day, some way, I guarantee
you
he'll use the arsenal.... President Clinton ~ 1998"

Bush lied?

yeah. because he was president AFTER clinton

and he had evidence...which he disregarded...that there were NO WMD's
in iraq.

clinton sent ZERO troops into iraq.

you right wingers....so let's summarize what you believe:

-obama's been president for 9 years
-clinton invaded iraq

amazing what you'll believe


*I* believe that it's time for most of you lefties to pull your head out
of the sand
and get a eyeful of reality.

Obama is.

Eisboch



Basically, you have no argument other than "it was Clinton's fault." Keep
trying.


I made no such argument. All I did was quote Wiki as to the origins of US
policy for regime change in Iraq. It did not start with Bush. He just
happened to carry out the unanimously approved policy by the Senate and
signed by his predecessor, Bill Clinton.

Eisboch

You can tell the pink army that forever, they know, it's just not productive
for them to tell the truth in matters like this. They have seen the videos,
they have read the reports, they just can't bring themselves to have an honest
debate.

Scotty

On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 06:50:15 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:



You can tell the pink army that forever, they know, it's just not productive
for them to tell the truth in matters like this. They have seen the videos,
they have read the reports, they just can't bring themselves to have an honest
debate.



how many troops did you say clinton sent to iraq?

On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 02:40:05 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:





I made no such argument. All I did was quote Wiki as to the origins of US
policy for regime change in Iraq. It did not start with Bush. He just
happened to carry out the unanimously approved policy by the Senate and
signed by his predecessor, Bill Clinton.

Eisboch

and yet clinton sent precisely

zero

troops to iraq.

go figure

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 21:44:12 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...


So, when a group makes an error and admits it, that means it's ok for
the
group that perpetrated the hoax to get off the hook.


Quoting from Wiki:

The Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 is a United States Congressional
statement
of policy calling for regime change in Iraq.[ It was signed into law by
President Bill Clinton.

The Act found that between 1980 and 1998 Iraq had:

1.. committed various and significant violations of International
Law,
2.. had failed to comply with the obligations to which it had agreed
following the Gulf War and
3.. further had ignored Resolutions of the United Nations Security
Council.
"He will then conclude that he can go right on and do more to rebuild
an
arsenal of devastating destruction. And some day, some way, I guarantee
you
he'll use the arsenal.... President Clinton ~ 1998"

Bush lied?

yeah. because he was president AFTER clinton

and he had evidence...which he disregarded...that there were NO WMD's
in iraq.

clinton sent ZERO troops into iraq.

you right wingers....so let's summarize what you believe:

-obama's been president for 9 years
-clinton invaded iraq

amazing what you'll believe


*I* believe that it's time for most of you lefties to pull your head out
of the sand
and get a eyeful of reality.

Obama is.

Eisboch



Basically, you have no argument other than "it was Clinton's fault." Keep
trying.


I made no such argument. All I did was quote Wiki as to the origins of US
policy for regime change in Iraq. It did not start with Bush. He just
happened to carry out the unanimously approved policy by the Senate and
signed by his predecessor, Bill Clinton.

Eisboch



Your intent was pretty clear. The fact that Clinton was concerned about Iraq
in no way justified Bush's illegal and immoral actions.


--
Nom=de=Plume