Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,427
Default article about seaworthiness

I was looking at a friend's magazine called Marine News (Jan/2010). It has
an interesting article about seaworthiness.

I couldn't find it on the website marinelink.com... guess it's too new. But,
if you get the magazine, it might be worth reading if you employ others on
your boat.

Basically, it discusses a vessel owner's responsibilities for
seaworthiness...

Duty of Vessel Owner to Furnish a Seaworthy Vessel
Under the general maritime law, a vessel owner has a duty to furnish a
seaworthy vessel. A seaworthy vessel is one which is reasonably fit to carry
the cargo it has undertaken to transport. While this duty is absolute, 'the
standard is not perfection, but reasonable fitness; not a ship that will
weather every conceivable storm or withstand every imaginable peril of the
sea, but a vessel reasonably suitable for her intended service.'


--
Nom=de=Plume


  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Tim Tim is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,107
Default article about seaworthiness

On Feb 5, 3:54*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
I was looking at a friend's magazine called Marine News (Jan/2010). It has
an interesting article about seaworthiness.

I couldn't find it on the website marinelink.com... guess it's too new. But,
if you get the magazine, it might be worth reading if you employ others on
your boat.

Basically, it discusses a vessel owner's responsibilities for
seaworthiness...

Duty of Vessel Owner to Furnish a Seaworthy Vessel
Under the general maritime law, a vessel owner has a duty to furnish a
seaworthy vessel. A seaworthy vessel is one which is reasonably fit to carry
the cargo it has undertaken to transport. While this duty is absolute, 'the
standard is not perfection, but reasonable fitness; not a ship that will
weather every conceivable storm or withstand every imaginable peril of the
sea, but a vessel reasonably suitable for her intended service.'

--
Nom=de=Plume


That's a good reminder on using common sense. Ive seen people out on
my favorite lakes that will have a 24' pontoon boat with about 25
people on it. it's so bad the the pontoons are about under water. or
an 18' open bow runabout with a load capacity of 7at 150lb. ea. and
there will be 10 adults plus gear hanging all over it.


Sooner or later, sumpin's gotta give.
  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,427
Default article about seaworthiness

"Tim" wrote in message
...
On Feb 5, 3:54 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
I was looking at a friend's magazine called Marine News (Jan/2010). It has
an interesting article about seaworthiness.

I couldn't find it on the website marinelink.com... guess it's too new.
But,
if you get the magazine, it might be worth reading if you employ others on
your boat.

Basically, it discusses a vessel owner's responsibilities for
seaworthiness...

Duty of Vessel Owner to Furnish a Seaworthy Vessel
Under the general maritime law, a vessel owner has a duty to furnish a
seaworthy vessel. A seaworthy vessel is one which is reasonably fit to
carry
the cargo it has undertaken to transport. While this duty is absolute,
'the
standard is not perfection, but reasonable fitness; not a ship that will
weather every conceivable storm or withstand every imaginable peril of the
sea, but a vessel reasonably suitable for her intended service.'

--
Nom=de=Plume


That's a good reminder on using common sense. Ive seen people out on
my favorite lakes that will have a 24' pontoon boat with about 25
people on it. it's so bad the the pontoons are about under water. or
an 18' open bow runabout with a load capacity of 7at 150lb. ea. and
there will be 10 adults plus gear hanging all over it.

Sooner or later, sumpin's gotta give.



Courts have found ships unseaworthy for a variety of reasons, from what I've
read on the subject, which makes sense. They include lack of bilge pump or
tools or similar, or items in disrepair, etc.

--
Nom=de=Plume


  #4   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Tim Tim is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,107
Default article about seaworthiness

On Feb 5, 5:02*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message

...
On Feb 5, 3:54 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:



I was looking at a friend's magazine called Marine News (Jan/2010). It has
an interesting article about seaworthiness.


I couldn't find it on the website marinelink.com... guess it's too new.
But,
if you get the magazine, it might be worth reading if you employ others on
your boat.


Basically, it discusses a vessel owner's responsibilities for
seaworthiness...


Duty of Vessel Owner to Furnish a Seaworthy Vessel
Under the general maritime law, a vessel owner has a duty to furnish a
seaworthy vessel. A seaworthy vessel is one which is reasonably fit to
carry
the cargo it has undertaken to transport. While this duty is absolute,
'the
standard is not perfection, but reasonable fitness; not a ship that will
weather every conceivable storm or withstand every imaginable peril of the
sea, but a vessel reasonably suitable for her intended service.'


--
Nom=de=Plume
That's a good reminder on using common sense. *Ive seen people out on
my favorite lakes that will have a 24' pontoon boat with about 25
people on it. it's so bad the the pontoons are about under water. or
an 18' open bow runabout with a load capacity of 7at 150lb. ea. *and
there will be 10 adults plus gear hanging *all over it.


Sooner or later, sumpin's gotta give.


Courts have found ships unseaworthy for a variety of reasons, from what I've
read on the subject, which makes sense. They include lack of bilge pump or
tools or similar, or items in disrepair, etc.

--
Nom=de=Plume


I know you were talking about vessels as if in commercial cargo types,
and it's bad that a lot of safety features are neglected or are sent
out with the threat of horrible weather approaching and having broken
or missing safety devices.

But I see this kind of thing happen on the lakes and rivers quite
frequently with personal craft too. Just because ones boat is in
order, doesn't mean they have to push it with stupidity.
  #5   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,197
Default article about seaworthiness


"Tim" wrote in message
...
On Feb 5, 3:54 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
I was looking at a friend's magazine called Marine News (Jan/2010). It has
an interesting article about seaworthiness.

I couldn't find it on the website marinelink.com... guess it's too new.
But,
if you get the magazine, it might be worth reading if you employ others on
your boat.

Basically, it discusses a vessel owner's responsibilities for
seaworthiness...

Duty of Vessel Owner to Furnish a Seaworthy Vessel
Under the general maritime law, a vessel owner has a duty to furnish a
seaworthy vessel. A seaworthy vessel is one which is reasonably fit to
carry
the cargo it has undertaken to transport. While this duty is absolute,
'the
standard is not perfection, but reasonable fitness; not a ship that will
weather every conceivable storm or withstand every imaginable peril of the
sea, but a vessel reasonably suitable for her intended service.'

--
Nom=de=Plume


That's a good reminder on using common sense. Ive seen people out on
my favorite lakes that will have a 24' pontoon boat with about 25
people on it. it's so bad the the pontoons are about under water. or
an 18' open bow runabout with a load capacity of 7at 150lb. ea. and
there will be 10 adults plus gear hanging all over it.


Sooner or later, sumpin's gotta give.

18' boat? Try a 14' boat.
http://www.amr-sanjoaquin.net/images...g_accident.pdf




  #6   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,427
Default article about seaworthiness

"Tim" wrote in message
...
On Feb 5, 5:02 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message

...
On Feb 5, 3:54 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:



I was looking at a friend's magazine called Marine News (Jan/2010). It
has
an interesting article about seaworthiness.


I couldn't find it on the website marinelink.com... guess it's too new.
But,
if you get the magazine, it might be worth reading if you employ others
on
your boat.


Basically, it discusses a vessel owner's responsibilities for
seaworthiness...


Duty of Vessel Owner to Furnish a Seaworthy Vessel
Under the general maritime law, a vessel owner has a duty to furnish a
seaworthy vessel. A seaworthy vessel is one which is reasonably fit to
carry
the cargo it has undertaken to transport. While this duty is absolute,
'the
standard is not perfection, but reasonable fitness; not a ship that will
weather every conceivable storm or withstand every imaginable peril of
the
sea, but a vessel reasonably suitable for her intended service.'


--
Nom=de=Plume
That's a good reminder on using common sense. Ive seen people out on
my favorite lakes that will have a 24' pontoon boat with about 25
people on it. it's so bad the the pontoons are about under water. or
an 18' open bow runabout with a load capacity of 7at 150lb. ea. and
there will be 10 adults plus gear hanging all over it.


Sooner or later, sumpin's gotta give.


Courts have found ships unseaworthy for a variety of reasons, from what
I've
read on the subject, which makes sense. They include lack of bilge pump or
tools or similar, or items in disrepair, etc.

--
Nom=de=Plume


I know you were talking about vessels as if in commercial cargo types,
and it's bad that a lot of safety features are neglected or are sent
out with the threat of horrible weather approaching and having broken
or missing safety devices.

But I see this kind of thing happen on the lakes and rivers quite
frequently with personal craft too. Just because ones boat is in
order, doesn't mean they have to push it with stupidity.


Reply: I have no doubt.

--
Nom=de=Plume


  #7   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Tim Tim is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,107
Default article about seaworthiness

On Feb 5, 5:34*pm, "Bill McKee" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message

...
On Feb 5, 3:54 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:



I was looking at a friend's magazine called Marine News (Jan/2010). It has
an interesting article about seaworthiness.


I couldn't find it on the website marinelink.com... guess it's too new.
But,
if you get the magazine, it might be worth reading if you employ others on
your boat.


Basically, it discusses a vessel owner's responsibilities for
seaworthiness...


Duty of Vessel Owner to Furnish a Seaworthy Vessel
Under the general maritime law, a vessel owner has a duty to furnish a
seaworthy vessel. A seaworthy vessel is one which is reasonably fit to
carry
the cargo it has undertaken to transport. While this duty is absolute,
'the
standard is not perfection, but reasonable fitness; not a ship that will
weather every conceivable storm or withstand every imaginable peril of the
sea, but a vessel reasonably suitable for her intended service.'


--
Nom=de=Plume


That's a good reminder on using common sense. *Ive seen people out on
my favorite lakes that will have a 24' pontoon boat with about 25
people on it. it's so bad the the pontoons are about under water. or
an 18' open bow runabout with a load capacity of 7at 150lb. ea. *and
there will be 10 adults plus gear hanging *all over it.

Sooner or later, sumpin's gotta give.

18' boat? *Try a 14' boat.http://www.amr-sanjoaquin.net/images..._June_08-_men_...


"The 10 men were crowded into the 14-foot boat designed for up to six.
There were no flotation devices or lights, Garcia said.
"Exceeding capacity is not even the right word to describe it," said
Garcia of the small boat that was later pulled from the canal.
"They're telling us it started taking on water and sank fairly
quickly."

No kidding, it sank fairly quickly.

Good Lord!
  #8   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Tim Tim is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,107
Default article about seaworthiness

On Feb 5, 5:51*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message

...
On Feb 5, 5:02 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:



"Tim" wrote in message


...
On Feb 5, 3:54 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:


I was looking at a friend's magazine called Marine News (Jan/2010). It
has
an interesting article about seaworthiness.


I couldn't find it on the website marinelink.com... guess it's too new.
But,
if you get the magazine, it might be worth reading if you employ others
on
your boat.


Basically, it discusses a vessel owner's responsibilities for
seaworthiness...


Duty of Vessel Owner to Furnish a Seaworthy Vessel
Under the general maritime law, a vessel owner has a duty to furnish a
seaworthy vessel. A seaworthy vessel is one which is reasonably fit to
carry
the cargo it has undertaken to transport. While this duty is absolute,
'the
standard is not perfection, but reasonable fitness; not a ship that will
weather every conceivable storm or withstand every imaginable peril of
the
sea, but a vessel reasonably suitable for her intended service.'


--
Nom=de=Plume
That's a good reminder on using common sense. Ive seen people out on
my favorite lakes that will have a 24' pontoon boat with about 25
people on it. it's so bad the the pontoons are about under water. or
an 18' open bow runabout with a load capacity of 7at 150lb. ea. and
there will be 10 adults plus gear hanging all over it.


Sooner or later, sumpin's gotta give.


Courts have found ships unseaworthy for a variety of reasons, from what
I've
read on the subject, which makes sense. They include lack of bilge pump or
tools or similar, or items in disrepair, etc.


--
Nom=de=Plume


I know you were talking about vessels as if in commercial cargo types,
and it's bad that a lot of safety features are neglected or are sent
out with the threat of horrible weather approaching *and having broken
or missing safety devices.

But I see this kind of thing happen on the lakes and rivers quite
frequently with personal craft *too. Just because ones boat is in
order, doesn't mean they have to push it with stupidity.

Reply: I have no doubt.

--
Nom=de=Plume


It's amazing what you can see at a lake on a holiday weekend.

But on the lighter side, I always get a chuckle out of threads like
this one:

http://continuouswave.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/009598.html
  #9   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2010
Posts: 10
Default article about seaworthiness

nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Feb 5, 3:54 pm, wrote:

I was looking at a friend's magazine called Marine News (Jan/2010). It has
an interesting article about seaworthiness.

I couldn't find it on the website marinelink.com... guess it's too new.
But,
if you get the magazine, it might be worth reading if you employ others on
your boat.

Basically, it discusses a vessel owner's responsibilities for
seaworthiness...

Duty of Vessel Owner to Furnish a Seaworthy Vessel
Under the general maritime law, a vessel owner has a duty to furnish a
seaworthy vessel. A seaworthy vessel is one which is reasonably fit to
carry
the cargo it has undertaken to transport. While this duty is absolute,
'the
standard is not perfection, but reasonable fitness; not a ship that will
weather every conceivable storm or withstand every imaginable peril of the
sea, but a vessel reasonably suitable for her intended service.'

--
Nom=de=Plume


That's a good reminder on using common sense. Ive seen people out on
my favorite lakes that will have a 24' pontoon boat with about 25
people on it. it's so bad the the pontoons are about under water. or
an 18' open bow runabout with a load capacity of 7at 150lb. ea. and
there will be 10 adults plus gear hanging all over it.

Sooner or later, sumpin's gotta give.


Courts have found ships unseaworthy for a variety of reasons, from what I've
read on the subject, which makes sense. They include lack of bilge pump or
tools or similar, or items in disrepair, etc.



A failure like that wouldn't matter if one or one hundred were on board.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GPS article hiruma222 General 0 August 23rd 07 01:42 AM
Seaworthiness Q & A -Bluewater characteristics Mic Cruising 0 October 10th 05 04:25 PM
Seaworthiness of Mac26 Parallax Cruising 57 May 30th 04 07:34 PM
Seaworthiness ? The_navigator© ASA 83 December 7th 03 11:39 PM
Seaworthiness Peter Ward Boat Building 23 November 13th 03 05:16 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:50 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017