On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:31:33 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:39:40 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:13:41 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
om...
Over thirty posts in about 2 1/2 hours!

I'm sure they were all well thought out posts!
--

"Your honor can never be taken from you. Cherish it, in yourself and
in
others." (Unknown)

John H


Like I said, you can't not read them.

"Can't not read"? I wonder if a double contraction is permissible?
Something like "can't't." Of course if negation is the course for the
day, one might be able to cancel a "not" by multiplying the double
contraction by a "1/not" ((can't't)(1/not)) to end up with a "can't."
Or maybe one 'can't' do that. Of course, if you're a moral
relativist, everything is permissible...


English is a living language, and this isn't an English class.

I wan't aware that the tone was critical. Just a spot of fun there.


Ok, well, you sure did go on about it.

Oh, now he's fancying himself a gentleman. A "spot of fun."

Isn't that precious? Bloody dildo.