Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#22
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 24, 7:41*pm, John Herring wrote:
On Jan 24, 5:07*pm, wrote: On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:13:41 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "John H" wrote in message .. . Over thirty posts in about 2 1/2 hours! I'm sure they were all well thought out posts! -- "Your honor can never be taken from you. Cherish it, in yourself and in others." (Unknown) John H Like I said, you can't not read them. "Can't not read"? *I wonder if a double contraction is permissible? Something like "can't't." *Of course if negation is the course for the day, one might be able to cancel a "not" by multiplying the double contraction by a "1/not" ((can't't)(1/not)) to end up with a "can't." Or maybe one 'can't' do that. *Of course, if you're a moral relativist, everything is permissible... Jesus has taught us all that being a prick isn't the most attractive personality trait so what gives with you? http://bible.cc/matthew/7-3.htm |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Just for the Record... | General | |||
Just for the Record... | General | |||
Just for the record... | General | |||
For the Record...the real record! | ASA | |||
new record | ASA |