Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"CalifBill" wrote in message
news ![]() "bpuharic" wrote in message news ![]() On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 13:39:42 -0500, wrote: On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 04:31:18 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: This is the reason I believe legislation is needed to encourage small business startups and expansion. It's not the time to penalize small businesses that are struggling to stay alive. High capital gains taxes is part of the penalty, both for those who invest in their own business or for those who provide funding for one. Eisboch The UAW is an aberration that only demonstrates the "union bubble". The UAW managed to drive compensation up, far beyond the value of the work and we had a correction. Just like those cracker box houses that were selling for $300k a few years ago, sanity has returned to the car business ... in Tennessee. Putting a bearing in a transmission case and hitting it with a soft hammer is not worth $50,000 a year (what my wife's nephew was doing, right out of high school). He did have to pick the case up and put it on the belt. That is why it was an entry level job. (Kokomo Chrysler plant) It's good to have a dad who is a shop steward I guess. actually what happened was that GM treated the american consumer like an ATM. the japanese treated american consumers like we were consumers. GM managers were accountants. toyota's are engineers who focused on building cars. it was corporate america's attitude that destroyed GM, not the UAW. Was the UAW and management that caused the meltdown. No quality from either management or UAW. go to Japan and Deming's photo is in every manufacturing company. The father of quality control. Actually, I agree with you, mostly. Management is typically the first out of the block, as far as culpability for business failure goes (poor, exploitive management practices gave birth to the union movement in the US), but history is pretty clear that the UAW didn't do right by its members nor by the company. There's a big difference between the union management (see previous paragraph about management culpability) and the regular worker, however. -- Nom=de=Plume |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "CalifBill" wrote in message news ![]() "bpuharic" wrote in message news ![]() On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 13:39:42 -0500, wrote: On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 04:31:18 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: This is the reason I believe legislation is needed to encourage small business startups and expansion. It's not the time to penalize small businesses that are struggling to stay alive. High capital gains taxes is part of the penalty, both for those who invest in their own business or for those who provide funding for one. Eisboch The UAW is an aberration that only demonstrates the "union bubble". The UAW managed to drive compensation up, far beyond the value of the work and we had a correction. Just like those cracker box houses that were selling for $300k a few years ago, sanity has returned to the car business ... in Tennessee. Putting a bearing in a transmission case and hitting it with a soft hammer is not worth $50,000 a year (what my wife's nephew was doing, right out of high school). He did have to pick the case up and put it on the belt. That is why it was an entry level job. (Kokomo Chrysler plant) It's good to have a dad who is a shop steward I guess. actually what happened was that GM treated the american consumer like an ATM. the japanese treated american consumers like we were consumers. GM managers were accountants. toyota's are engineers who focused on building cars. it was corporate america's attitude that destroyed GM, not the UAW. Was the UAW and management that caused the meltdown. No quality from either management or UAW. go to Japan and Deming's photo is in every manufacturing company. The father of quality control. Actually, I agree with you, mostly. Management is typically the first out of the block, as far as culpability for business failure goes (poor, exploitive management practices gave birth to the union movement in the US), but history is pretty clear that the UAW didn't do right by its members nor by the company. There's a big difference between the union management (see previous paragraph about management culpability) and the regular worker, however. -- Nom=de=Plume The worker votes for the union management, so they get the blame also. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
nom=de=plume wrote:
There's a big difference between the union management (see previous paragraph about management culpability) and the regular worker, however. There sure is Dippy. Management is holding regular workers back from producing an honest days work. I'm sure Union Management has some attributes. I just can't think of any right now. Perhaps you can. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 21:52:52 -0800, "CalifBill"
wrote: "bpuharic" wrote in message news ![]() On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 13:39:42 -0500, wrote: On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 04:31:18 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: The UAW is an aberration that only demonstrates the "union bubble". The UAW managed to drive compensation up, far beyond the value of the work and we had a correction. Just like those cracker box houses that were selling for $300k a few years ago, sanity has returned to the car business ... in Tennessee. Putting a bearing in a transmission case and hitting it with a soft hammer is not worth $50,000 a year (what my wife's nephew was doing, right out of high school). He did have to pick the case up and put it on the belt. That is why it was an entry level job. (Kokomo Chrysler plant) It's good to have a dad who is a shop steward I guess. actually what happened was that GM treated the american consumer like an ATM. the japanese treated american consumers like we were consumers. GM managers were accountants. toyota's are engineers who focused on building cars. it was corporate america's attitude that destroyed GM, not the UAW. Was the UAW and management that caused the meltdown. No quality from either management or UAW. go to Japan and Deming's photo is in every manufacturing company. The father of quality control. agree to a certain extent. i used to work for bell labs..they invented much of modern quality control (most business still use the 'western electric rules' for statistical process control) many japanese auto plants are unionized. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
... On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 12:24:30 -0500, bpuharic wrote: What was GM's largest financial liability? it wasn't labor. labor accounts for less than 10% of a car's cost try again...you already proved how much right wingers hate the middle class when you blamed us for the financial meltdown, instead of your god, wall street. You try again, The biggest cost of a GM car was the pension and benefit obligation ... and we ARE the middle class Which were negotiated liabilities. You act like the unions were in charge. Management made the deals too. -- Nom=de=Plume |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
... On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 15:52:19 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message . .. On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 12:24:30 -0500, bpuharic wrote: What was GM's largest financial liability? it wasn't labor. labor accounts for less than 10% of a car's cost try again...you already proved how much right wingers hate the middle class when you blamed us for the financial meltdown, instead of your god, wall street. You try again, The biggest cost of a GM car was the pension and benefit obligation ... and we ARE the middle class Which were negotiated liabilities. You act like the unions were in charge. Management made the deals too. I have said it was a shared responsibility. Why do you think I am saying any one faction did this. That is you guys. This is not a right wing thing it is all a shared responsibility. Please show me where I said it was one side. -- Nom=de=Plume |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
... On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:02:51 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Please show me where I said it was one side. Stop blaming Clinton and the democrats for something that's obviously been supported far longer and with more fervor by the right wing." Both accurate statements. Your point? -- Nom=de=Plume |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Brown Wins, Democrats bit the dust | General | |||
River Ice Breaking 04 | Tall Ship Photos | |||
breaking news | General | |||
Evinrude E-TEC wins 24 hr. race in Rouen France | General | |||
Republican Wins Ohio Congressional Race | General |