On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 19:42:10 -0500, John H wrote:

On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:26:38 -0600, thunder
wrote:

On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:55:46 -0500, bpuharic wrote:


and the SCOTUS just ****ed us again. they ruled companies can do
whatever they want in terms of paying for campaigns.

this country, courtesy of the right wing, may be doomed

Oh yee of little faith. While I'll agree the SCOTUS decision is the
absolutely wrong one, you are starting to sound like a Republican, all
doom and gloom. If there is one thing I have learned, in my short time
on this planet, is this country is incredibly resilient. It's people
are the hardest working, most creative, people you will find. We have
faced far more difficult challenges than this current SCOTUS. We will
survive, and we will prosper. Hell, eight years of Bush hasn't killed
us. Need I say more?

It's OK for Democrats to bribe each other with taxpayer money, but not
OK for both Democrats and Republicans to recieve corporate money.

Liberal thinking is quite strange.

When a multinational based in China, the communist one, decides to take
an interest in our elections, tell me again how strange Liberal thinking
is.

On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:48:23 -0600, thunder
wrote:

On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 19:42:10 -0500, John H wrote:

On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:26:38 -0600, thunder
wrote:

On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:55:46 -0500, bpuharic wrote:


and the SCOTUS just ****ed us again. they ruled companies can do
whatever they want in terms of paying for campaigns.

this country, courtesy of the right wing, may be doomed

Oh yee of little faith. While I'll agree the SCOTUS decision is the
absolutely wrong one, you are starting to sound like a Republican, all
doom and gloom. If there is one thing I have learned, in my short time
on this planet, is this country is incredibly resilient. It's people
are the hardest working, most creative, people you will find. We have
faced far more difficult challenges than this current SCOTUS. We will
survive, and we will prosper. Hell, eight years of Bush hasn't killed
us. Need I say more?

It's OK for Democrats to bribe each other with taxpayer money, but not
OK for both Democrats and Republicans to recieve corporate money.

Liberal thinking is quite strange.

When a multinational based in China, the communist one, decides to take
an interest in our elections, tell me again how strange Liberal thinking
is.

Do you honestly think they aren't now? Didn't someone here mention the
18% tariff paid on our exports to China and the zero percent tariff
paid on their imports? Do you think Democrats aren't affected by
money?

LOL
--
John H

All decisions are the result of binary thinking.

John H wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:48:23 -0600,
wrote:


On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 19:42:10 -0500, John H wrote:


On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:26:38 -0600,
wrote:


On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:55:46 -0500, bpuharic wrote:



and the SCOTUS just ****ed us again. they ruled companies can do
whatever they want in terms of paying for campaigns.

this country, courtesy of the right wing, may be doomed

Oh yee of little faith. While I'll agree the SCOTUS decision is the
absolutely wrong one, you are starting to sound like a Republican, all
doom and gloom. If there is one thing I have learned, in my short time
on this planet, is this country is incredibly resilient. It's people
are the hardest working, most creative, people you will find. We have
faced far more difficult challenges than this current SCOTUS. We will
survive, and we will prosper. Hell, eight years of Bush hasn't killed
us. Need I say more?

It's OK for Democrats to bribe each other with taxpayer money, but not
OK for both Democrats and Republicans to recieve corporate money.

Liberal thinking is quite strange.

When a multinational based in China, the communist one, decides to take
an interest in our elections, tell me again how strange Liberal thinking
is.

Do you honestly think they aren't now? Didn't someone here mention the
18% tariff paid on our exports to China and the zero percent tariff
paid on their imports? Do you think Democrats aren't affected by
money?

LOL

There are import tariffs, but they are based on the commodity. There
have been a litany of anti-dumping suits reviewed by the DOC that have
lead to these tariffs. However, I'm sure most Chinese imports do have a
0% tariff.

These tariffs result in higher prices for the products we buy but they
also help protect jobs in North America via NAFTA.

In article ,
says...
It's OK for Democrats to bribe each other with taxpayer money, but not
OK for both Democrats and Republicans to recieve corporate money.

Liberal thinking is quite strange.

When a multinational based in China, the communist one, decides to take
an interest in our elections, tell me again how strange Liberal thinking
is.

Then all "International" labor unions should be prevented form
participating in US politics too.

On 22/01/2010 5:48 PM, thunder wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 19:42:10 -0500, John H wrote:

On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:26:38 -0600,
wrote:

On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:55:46 -0500, bpuharic wrote:


and the SCOTUS just ****ed us again. they ruled companies can do
whatever they want in terms of paying for campaigns.

this country, courtesy of the right wing, may be doomed

Oh yee of little faith. While I'll agree the SCOTUS decision is the
absolutely wrong one, you are starting to sound like a Republican, all
doom and gloom. If there is one thing I have learned, in my short time
on this planet, is this country is incredibly resilient. It's people
are the hardest working, most creative, people you will find. We have
faced far more difficult challenges than this current SCOTUS. We will
survive, and we will prosper. Hell, eight years of Bush hasn't killed
us. Need I say more?

It's OK for Democrats to bribe each other with taxpayer money, but not
OK for both Democrats and Republicans to recieve corporate money.

Liberal thinking is quite strange.

When a multinational based in China, the communist one, decides to take
an interest in our elections, tell me again how strange Liberal thinking
is.

So? Are you now imposing who can bribe who? You mean only democrats
can accept bribes?

LMAO - typical liberal-democrat bull****.

On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 10:35:17 -0700, Canuck57 wrote:


When a multinational based in China, the communist one, decides to take
an interest in our elections, tell me again how strange Liberal
thinking is.

So? Are you now imposing who can bribe who? You mean only democrats
can accept bribes?

I guess that must be it. I'm an American, and I have this funny idea,
America should be run by Americans. We don't need any help from Chinese
communists to run it, or Canadians, for that matter.


LMAO - typical liberal-democrat bull****.

On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 13:34:10 -0600, thunder
wrote:

On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 10:35:17 -0700, Canuck57 wrote:


When a multinational based in China, the communist one, decides to take
an interest in our elections, tell me again how strange Liberal
thinking is.

So? Are you now imposing who can bribe who? You mean only democrats
can accept bribes?

I guess that must be it. I'm an American, and I have this funny idea,
America should be run by Americans. We don't need any help from Chinese
communists to run it, or Canadians, for that matter.

Soros couldn't take money from the Chinese? Could Chinese individuals
not make contributions? You obviously don't like the ruling, so you're
making up ridiculous reasons to be against it.

Talk about a strawman.

LMAO - typical liberal-democrat bull****.

I agree.

--

"Your honor can never be taken from you. Cherish it, in yourself and in others." (Unknown)

John H

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 13:34:10 -0600, thunder
wrote:

On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 10:35:17 -0700, Canuck57 wrote:


When a multinational based in China, the communist one, decides to take
an interest in our elections, tell me again how strange Liberal
thinking is.

So? Are you now imposing who can bribe who? You mean only democrats
can accept bribes?

I guess that must be it. I'm an American, and I have this funny idea,
America should be run by Americans. We don't need any help from Chinese
communists to run it, or Canadians, for that matter.

Soros couldn't take money from the Chinese? Could Chinese individuals
not make contributions? You obviously don't like the ruling, so you're
making up ridiculous reasons to be against it.

Talk about a strawman.



Talk about not thinking! Soros (or Gates or whomever) would never have the
financial resources compared to a multi-billion dollar company. I believe
you have to be a US citizen to make campaign contributions, so Chinese
individuals could not make contributions.

http://www.fec.gov/pages/brochures/foreign.shtml

--
Nom=de=Plume

On 23/01/2010 1:48 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"John wrote in message
...
On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 13:34:10 -0600,
wrote:

On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 10:35:17 -0700, Canuck57 wrote:


When a multinational based in China, the communist one, decides to take
an interest in our elections, tell me again how strange Liberal
thinking is.

So? Are you now imposing who can bribe who? You mean only democrats
can accept bribes?

I guess that must be it. I'm an American, and I have this funny idea,
America should be run by Americans. We don't need any help from Chinese
communists to run it, or Canadians, for that matter.

Soros couldn't take money from the Chinese? Could Chinese individuals
not make contributions? You obviously don't like the ruling, so you're
making up ridiculous reasons to be against it.

Talk about a strawman.



Talk about not thinking! Soros (or Gates or whomever) would never have the
financial resources compared to a multi-billion dollar company. I believe
you have to be a US citizen to make campaign contributions, so Chinese
individuals could not make contributions.

http://www.fec.gov/pages/brochures/foreign.shtml

Want to make a bet on that? Bet I could legally contribute to Obama or
Palin, hell, why not both! So if either wins, I win!

Recipes:

Open up a US corporation, any LLC will do. From there direct a
donation. Foreign owned, but a US corporation. That simple. A US
corporation is a US entity.

And if that isn't good enough, I am sure there are plenty of Americans
that would do it for a fee.

In fact, bet I could write a $1000 cheque from an American address and
bank account and get both the Dem or GOP to cash it. I really doubt all
the cheques are checked. I can even provide a valid SSN if needed.

And there is always cash in a brief case. There is a reason why
government does not make everything plastic, they too want cash under
the table.

Just another unenforcable law. But not that I recommend trying it.

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 23/01/2010 1:48 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"John wrote in message
...
On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 13:34:10 -0600,
wrote:

On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 10:35:17 -0700, Canuck57 wrote:


When a multinational based in China, the communist one, decides to
take
an interest in our elections, tell me again how strange Liberal
thinking is.

So? Are you now imposing who can bribe who? You mean only democrats
can accept bribes?

I guess that must be it. I'm an American, and I have this funny idea,
America should be run by Americans. We don't need any help from
Chinese
communists to run it, or Canadians, for that matter.

Soros couldn't take money from the Chinese? Could Chinese individuals
not make contributions? You obviously don't like the ruling, so you're
making up ridiculous reasons to be against it.

Talk about a strawman.



Talk about not thinking! Soros (or Gates or whomever) would never have
the
financial resources compared to a multi-billion dollar company. I believe
you have to be a US citizen to make campaign contributions, so Chinese
individuals could not make contributions.

http://www.fec.gov/pages/brochures/foreign.shtml

Want to make a bet on that? Bet I could legally contribute to Obama or
Palin, hell, why not both! So if either wins, I win!

Recipes:

Open up a US corporation, any LLC will do. From there direct a donation.
Foreign owned, but a US corporation. That simple. A US corporation is a
US entity.

And if that isn't good enough, I am sure there are plenty of Americans
that would do it for a fee.

In fact, bet I could write a $1000 cheque from an American address and
bank account and get both the Dem or GOP to cash it. I really doubt all
the cheques are checked. I can even provide a valid SSN if needed.

And there is always cash in a brief case. There is a reason why
government does not make everything plastic, they too want cash under the
table.

Just another unenforcable law. But not that I recommend trying it.


So, you're an idiot and a potential criminal. Great combo.
--
Nom=de=Plume