In a Purdue University classroom, they were discussing the qualifications to
be President of the United States. It was pretty simple: the candidate must
be a natural born citizen of at least 35 years of age.

However, one girl in the class immediately started in on how unfair was the
requirement to be a natural born citizen. In short, her opinion was that
this requirement prevented many capable individuals from becoming
president. The class was taking it in and letting her rant, and not many
jaws hit the floor when she wrapped up her argument by stating "What makes
a natural born citizen any more qualified to lead this country than one born
by C-section?"

Yep, these are the same kind of 18-year-olds that just voted in our last
election! They breed and they walk Among US...

On 1/16/2010 12:13 PM, Anony Mouse wrote:
In a Purdue University classroom, they were discussing the
qualifications to be President of the United States. It was pretty
simple: the candidate must be a natural born citizen of at least 35
years of age.

However, one girl in the class immediately started in on how unfair was
the requirement to be a natural born citizen. In short, her opinion was
that this requirement prevented many capable individuals from becoming
president. The class was taking it in and letting her rant, and not many
jaws hit the floor when she wrapped up her argument by stating "What
makes a natural born citizen any more qualified to lead this country
than one born by C-section?"

Yep, these are the same kind of 18-year-olds that just voted in our last
election! They breed and they walk Among US...





A relative of yours, no doubt. Did I tell you about my wife's
relationship with garden produce?