On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:35:51 -0500, Gene
wrote:

On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:14:18 -0800, jps wrote:

On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:01:05 -0500, Gene
wrote:

On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:33:34 -0800, jps wrote:

The problem here is that you've been conditioned to think of gay as
equating with S&M and other fetishes, which are certainly not
exclusive to the gay population.

You assumptions are so moronic.... and what you don't know about me is
so abundant, I won't even go there.

Let me just say that an IN-YOUR-FACE gay march in DC, replete with
plenty of fetish regalia and open sexual (kinky) activity ruined a
family museum outing with my son and sent us into a rapid retreat from
the spectacle. I'm all about the freedom of adults to express
themselves any way they (in a consenting manner) wish to privately
express themselves.

Forcing it down other folks throat has earned them a well deserved
"down" from other folks... including the lesbian, gay, transgendered,
and straight.....

Well then, your assumptions must be moronic too, eh?
.
I'm not ASSUMING anything.

You weren't forced to be there.

It was THE PUBLIC. People are supposed to act in a CIVIL manner in
PUBLIC. They didn't.

It was on THE MALL..... it ruined EVERY family's chance at a day at
the museums.... it was WRONG.

I wasn't forced to be there.... WE were forced to LEAVE.

It was an unfortunate occurance. No one was forcing their lifestyle
or beliefs on you or your kids. That's baloney and you know it.

Oh.... fine. So I get to explain to an 8 year old why one woman is
dragging another around by a dog leash. Adults G/L/T/S could
reasonably act the way these folks were acting at the local swing
club, but not in public and not in front of kids. Tell you what, you
take your kids and grand kids to the local gay bar for fun.... I'm
headed to Chuckie Cheese with mine.....

What was happening went right over your 8 year old's head. You could
have swept it aside in a moments notice by telling your kid that they
were play acting and just having silly fun. Your kid would have
thought nothing more of it.

My wife managed the campaign of an openly gay state rep in California
several years ago and both our pre-10 year olds marched in the local
parade next to drag queens and transvestites. We've chosen to expose
them to all sorts of people and not seed fearful complexes (like
yours).

They also go to school with African Americans, 16 different flavors of
Asians, Indians, Arabs, North Africans, etc., etc.

They're completely normal kids with a broader range of understanding
and empathy because of it. I'm sure you'd like them, even if you
can't appreciate the leanings of their father.

What's astonishing to me is that you find gays a more frightening
influence than guns.

I guess inanimate things are easier for you to deal with.

jps wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:35:51 -0500, Gene
wrote:

On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:14:18 -0800, jps wrote:

On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:01:05 -0500, Gene
wrote:

On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:33:34 -0800, jps wrote:

The problem here is that you've been conditioned to think of gay as
equating with S&M and other fetishes, which are certainly not
exclusive to the gay population.
You assumptions are so moronic.... and what you don't know about me is
so abundant, I won't even go there.

Let me just say that an IN-YOUR-FACE gay march in DC, replete with
plenty of fetish regalia and open sexual (kinky) activity ruined a
family museum outing with my son and sent us into a rapid retreat from
the spectacle. I'm all about the freedom of adults to express
themselves any way they (in a consenting manner) wish to privately
express themselves.

Forcing it down other folks throat has earned them a well deserved
"down" from other folks... including the lesbian, gay, transgendered,
and straight.....
Well then, your assumptions must be moronic too, eh?
.
I'm not ASSUMING anything.

You weren't forced to be there.
It was THE PUBLIC. People are supposed to act in a CIVIL manner in
PUBLIC. They didn't.

It was on THE MALL..... it ruined EVERY family's chance at a day at
the museums.... it was WRONG.

I wasn't forced to be there.... WE were forced to LEAVE.

It was an unfortunate occurance. No one was forcing their lifestyle
or beliefs on you or your kids. That's baloney and you know it.
Oh.... fine. So I get to explain to an 8 year old why one woman is
dragging another around by a dog leash. Adults G/L/T/S could
reasonably act the way these folks were acting at the local swing
club, but not in public and not in front of kids. Tell you what, you
take your kids and grand kids to the local gay bar for fun.... I'm
headed to Chuckie Cheese with mine.....

What was happening went right over your 8 year old's head. You could
have swept it aside in a moments notice by telling your kid that they
were play acting and just having silly fun. Your kid would have
thought nothing more of it.

You avoid tough questions by lying to your kid? Aint that speshulll.



My wife managed the campaign of an openly gay state rep in California
several years ago and both our pre-10 year olds marched in the local
parade next to drag queens and transvestites. We've chosen to expose
them to all sorts of people and not seed fearful complexes (like
yours).

You have chosen to expose your kids to these sickos without so much as a
heads up as to what these folks are into. Aint that speshulll



They also go to school with African Americans, 16 different flavors of
Asians, Indians, Arabs, North Africans, etc., etc.

16 flavors. That's a wonderful way to categorize people of different
cultures. You are speshulll


They're completely normal kids with a broader range of understanding
and empathy because of it.

I wouldn't trust your definition of normal.

I'm sure you'd like them, even if you
can't appreciate the leanings of their father.

Could be.

What's astonishing to me is that you find gays a more frightening
influence than guns.

I wonder what influenced you to make that statement. It seems to be
quite bizarre to me.


I guess inanimate things are easier for you to deal with.

Yawn

Your buddie,
Harieeee.

On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 00:44:05 -0800, jps wrote:

On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:35:51 -0500, Gene
wrote:

On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:14:18 -0800, jps wrote:

On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:01:05 -0500, Gene
wrote:

On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:33:34 -0800, jps wrote:

The problem here is that you've been conditioned to think of gay as
equating with S&M and other fetishes, which are certainly not
exclusive to the gay population.

You assumptions are so moronic.... and what you don't know about me is
so abundant, I won't even go there.

Let me just say that an IN-YOUR-FACE gay march in DC, replete with
plenty of fetish regalia and open sexual (kinky) activity ruined a
family museum outing with my son and sent us into a rapid retreat from
the spectacle. I'm all about the freedom of adults to express
themselves any way they (in a consenting manner) wish to privately
express themselves.

Forcing it down other folks throat has earned them a well deserved
"down" from other folks... including the lesbian, gay, transgendered,
and straight.....

Well then, your assumptions must be moronic too, eh?
.
I'm not ASSUMING anything.

You weren't forced to be there.

It was THE PUBLIC. People are supposed to act in a CIVIL manner in
PUBLIC. They didn't.

It was on THE MALL..... it ruined EVERY family's chance at a day at
the museums.... it was WRONG.

I wasn't forced to be there.... WE were forced to LEAVE.

It was an unfortunate occurance. No one was forcing their lifestyle
or beliefs on you or your kids. That's baloney and you know it.

Oh.... fine. So I get to explain to an 8 year old why one woman is
dragging another around by a dog leash. Adults G/L/T/S could
reasonably act the way these folks were acting at the local swing
club, but not in public and not in front of kids. Tell you what, you
take your kids and grand kids to the local gay bar for fun.... I'm
headed to Chuckie Cheese with mine.....

What was happening went right over your 8 year old's head. You could
have swept it aside in a moments notice by telling your kid that they
were play acting and just having silly fun. Your kid would have
thought nothing more of it.

My wife managed the campaign of an openly gay state rep in California
several years ago and both our pre-10 year olds marched in the local
parade next to drag queens and transvestites. We've chosen to expose
them to all sorts of people and not seed fearful complexes (like
yours).

They also go to school with African Americans, 16 different flavors of
Asians, Indians, Arabs, North Africans, etc., etc.

They're completely normal kids with a broader range of understanding
and empathy because of it. I'm sure you'd like them, even if you
can't appreciate the leanings of their father.

What's astonishing to me is that you find gays a more frightening
influence than guns.

I guess inanimate things are easier for you to deal with.

Hello? Gene? You there Gene?

"Gene" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:33:34 -0800, jps wrote:

The problem here is that you've been conditioned to think of gay as
equating with S&M and other fetishes, which are certainly not
exclusive to the gay population.

You assumptions are so moronic.... and what you don't know about me is
so abundant, I won't even go there.

Let me just say that an IN-YOUR-FACE gay march in DC, replete with
plenty of fetish regalia and open sexual (kinky) activity ruined a
family museum outing with my son and sent us into a rapid retreat from
the spectacle. I'm all about the freedom of adults to express
themselves any way they (in a consenting manner) wish to privately
express themselves.

Forcing it down other folks throat has earned them a well deserved
"down" from other folks... including the lesbian, gay, transgendered,
and straight.....


Come on... that sort of thing has been going on for a while. You left right?
What's the problem?

--
Nom=de=Plume

nom=de=plume wrote:
"Gene" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:33:34 -0800, jps wrote:

The problem here is that you've been conditioned to think of gay as
equating with S&M and other fetishes, which are certainly not
exclusive to the gay population.
You assumptions are so moronic.... and what you don't know about me is
so abundant, I won't even go there.

Let me just say that an IN-YOUR-FACE gay march in DC, replete with
plenty of fetish regalia and open sexual (kinky) activity ruined a
family museum outing with my son and sent us into a rapid retreat from
the spectacle. I'm all about the freedom of adults to express
themselves any way they (in a consenting manner) wish to privately
express themselves.

Forcing it down other folks throat has earned them a well deserved
"down" from other folks... including the lesbian, gay, transgendered,
and straight.....


Come on... that sort of thing has been going on for a while. You left right?
What's the problem?

Go sit in the corner with JPS. No touching.

On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:07:23 -0500, Gene
wrote:

On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:33:34 -0800, jps wrote:


I find reference to poster's families particularly offensive and I
doubt that I am by myself.

Gene, take a deep breath along with whomever else finds my reference
to Herring's wife being a masochist in poor taste.

Herring is an exercise in poor taste and any chance to use him as
fodder for humor, however sick you deem it, is fair territory for me.

Do your eyebrows constantly furrow? Same with your rectum?

On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:55:16 -0500, Gene
wrote:

On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:19:56 -0800, jps wrote:

On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:07:23 -0500, Gene
wrote:

On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:33:34 -0800, jps wrote:


I find reference to poster's families particularly offensive and I
doubt that I am by myself.

Gene, take a deep breath along with whomever else finds my reference
to Herring's wife being a masochist in poor taste.

Herring is an exercise in poor taste and any chance to use him as
fodder for humor, however sick you deem it, is fair territory for me.

Do your eyebrows constantly furrow? Same with your rectum?

I do my share of picking on John, too, but his family, and yours, and
mine are..... as far as I'm concerned, not fair game. Some of you
folks take this so damn seriously. I don't like John's politics, but
I'd sit down and drink a beer with him..... some of you guys, well....
I guess I'm glad you DON'T like guns.....

Your fascination with gays and my rectum is duly noted......

I'm more interested in what your eyebrows and rectum say about your
state of mind. My suspicion is that they're both tight as can be.

Based on the photos I recall from your website, you're not at all my
type, or even gender. Thanks for keeping me in mind.

"Gene" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 15:56:41 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Gene" wrote in message
. ..
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 11:03:04 -0800, jps wrote:


MESQUITE, Texas -

The parents of a 4-year-old boy disciplined for having long hair have
rejected a compromise from a Texas school board that agreed to adjust
its grooming policy.

The impasse means pre-kindergartner Taylor Pugh will remain in
in-school suspension, sitting alone with a teacher's aide in a
library. He has been sequestered from classmates at Floyd Elementary
School in Mesquite, a Dallas suburb, since late November.

After a closed-door meeting Monday, the Mesquite school board decided
the boy could wear his hair in tight braids but keep it no longer than
his ears. But his parents say the adjustment isn't enough for Taylor,
who wears his hair long, covering his earlobes and shirt collar.

His mother, Elizabeth Taylor, said she'll pull back Taylor's hair in a
ponytail, acknowledging the style will keep him suspended.

According to the district dress code, boys' hair must be kept out of
the eyes and cannot extend below the bottom of earlobes or over the
collar of a dress shirt. Fads in hairstyles "designed to attract
attention to the individual or to disrupt the orderly conduct of the
classroom or campus is not permitted," the policy states.

The district is known for standing tough on its dress code. Last year,
a seventh-grader was sent home for wearing black skinny pants. His
parents chose to home-school him.

On its Web site, the district says its code is in place because
"students who dress and groom themselves neatly, and in an acceptable
and appropriate manner, are more likely to become constructive members
of the society in which we live."

Taylor said her fight is not over. She and her husband are considering
taking the district to court or appealing to the State Board of
Education.

"I know that there are a whole set of steps we can take," she said.



God forbid individualism. That's too American for Texas.

I'm sure that kid's long hair is preventing all of the other 4 year
olds from learning..... but, then..... it becomes all to obvious when
education is tossed in deference to indoctrination....


That's right! Another example - gay marriage preventing hetero couples
from
enjoying their relationships!

Biggest problem with gay.... well most anything.... is that it is so
IN-YOUR-FACE.

I wouldn't, as a hetero, expect to display my sexuality like this in
public. I don't need to see this, my kids don't need to see this, and
my grand kids don't need to see this. Frankly, it gets MUCH worse than
this.... whips, chains, leashes, Corinthian leather.... fine.... keep
it to yourself...
http://tinyurl.com/yrohxb

Sorry, can't transmit mindbleach through the net.....


There's plenty of "opposite" sex out there. I don't think that's going to be
a cogent argument when it gets to the SC.

--
Nom=de=Plume