*e#c wrote:
On Jan 9, 2:28 pm, John H wrote:
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 11:09:54 -0800, "nom=de=plume"



wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...
On Jan 9, 1:12 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message
...
On Jan 9, 1:24 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 19:22:01 -0800, JR North
wrote:
Mebbe you would change your mind if somone shot a harpoon into you.
JR
Mebbe YOU would change your mind if someone rammed your boat because
you were fishing.
There are plenty of PETA folks who think that is cruel to the fish,
deplete the seas and whatever
From what I heard, the Whale Wars boat boat was not moving. It was
rammed.
Are you really trying to defend the Japanese whaling industry??
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100106/...rctica_whaling
Even if the WW boat was still moving isn't it at a minimum _both_ boats'
fault? That's how I read the laws involved.
--
Nom=de=Plume
This vid looks to me like it was moving right along the side of the
Japanese fisherman then decided to cut across the bow and got clipped:
http://news.yahoo.com/video/world-15749633/17481983
A couple of things... First, this vid is from the Japanese perspective, so
it can't be considered definitive. Second, the WW mother ship probably has
contradictory vid that we haven't seen - I read they have five camera
angles. Third, both sides are obligated to avoid a collision, and since
the
Japanese and the WW boat could take action to do that, both should be at
fault.
--
Nom=de=Plume
What a dip. Have you ever heard of 'maneuverability'? Your knowledge
of maritime law is eclipsed only by...
Yes, but there's no indication that the Japanese boat even tried. It's not
like it was heavy fog or they didn't know the other boat was around.
Can't think of anything.
Pretty much sums up your "thinking."
What 'signs' are you looking for? Do you expect a ship that big to
show 'signs' in about 4 seconds?

I knew I had you filtered for a reason.
--

John H

"My reading of history convinces me that most bad government
results from too much government."

Thomas Jefferson

"Filtered", and still reading her posts...what a liar.


Herring is a lying asshole...always has been, always will be. And that's
one of his more admirable attributes.

"Don White" wrote in message
...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"John H" wrote in message
...
On Jan 9, 1:12 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message

...
On Jan 9, 1:24 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:



wrote in message

.. .

On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 19:22:01 -0800, JR North
wrote:

Mebbe you would change your mind if somone shot a harpoon into you.
JR

Mebbe YOU would change your mind if someone rammed your boat because
you were fishing.
There are plenty of PETA folks who think that is cruel to the fish,
deplete the seas and whatever

From what I heard, the Whale Wars boat boat was not moving. It was
rammed.
Are you really trying to defend the Japanese whaling industry??

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100106/...rctica_whaling

Even if the WW boat was still moving isn't it at a minimum _both_
boats'
fault? That's how I read the laws involved.

--
Nom=de=Plume
This vid looks to me like it was moving right along the side of the
Japanese fisherman then decided to cut across the bow and got clipped:

http://news.yahoo.com/video/world-15749633/17481983

A couple of things... First, this vid is from the Japanese perspective,
so
it can't be considered definitive. Second, the WW mother ship probably
has
contradictory vid that we haven't seen - I read they have five camera
angles. Third, both sides are obligated to avoid a collision, and since
the
Japanese and the WW boat could take action to do that, both should be at
fault.

--
Nom=de=Plume

What a dip. Have you ever heard of 'maneuverability'? Your knowledge
of maritime law is eclipsed only by...

Yes, but there's no indication that the Japanese boat even tried. It's
not like it was heavy fog or they didn't know the other boat was around.

Can't think of anything.

Pretty much sums up your "thinking."

--
Nom=de=Plume


~~ Snerk ~~ You tell him sister!

And, I'm not a maritime attorney even...

--
Nom=de=Plume

"John H" wrote in message
news
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 11:09:54 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Jan 9, 1:12 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message

...
On Jan 9, 1:24 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:



wrote in message

.. .

On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 19:22:01 -0800, JR North
wrote:

Mebbe you would change your mind if somone shot a harpoon into you.
JR

Mebbe YOU would change your mind if someone rammed your boat because
you were fishing.
There are plenty of PETA folks who think that is cruel to the fish,
deplete the seas and whatever

From what I heard, the Whale Wars boat boat was not moving. It was
rammed.
Are you really trying to defend the Japanese whaling industry??

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100106/...rctica_whaling

Even if the WW boat was still moving isn't it at a minimum _both_
boats'
fault? That's how I read the laws involved.

--
Nom=de=Plume
This vid looks to me like it was moving right along the side of the
Japanese fisherman then decided to cut across the bow and got clipped:

http://news.yahoo.com/video/world-15749633/17481983

A couple of things... First, this vid is from the Japanese perspective,
so
it can't be considered definitive. Second, the WW mother ship probably
has
contradictory vid that we haven't seen - I read they have five camera
angles. Third, both sides are obligated to avoid a collision, and since
the
Japanese and the WW boat could take action to do that, both should be at
fault.

--
Nom=de=Plume

What a dip. Have you ever heard of 'maneuverability'? Your knowledge
of maritime law is eclipsed only by...

Yes, but there's no indication that the Japanese boat even tried. It's not
like it was heavy fog or they didn't know the other boat was around.

Can't think of anything.

Pretty much sums up your "thinking."

What 'signs' are you looking for? Do you expect a ship that big to
show 'signs' in about 4 seconds?

I knew I had you filtered for a reason.
--

John H

"My reading of history convinces me that most bad government
results from too much government."

Thomas Jefferson


Four seconds??? Where did that number come from? The WW boat has been around
the Japanese fleet for weeks/months.

Please, please filter me! You're just too odd.


--
Nom=de=Plume

On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 12:02:36 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
news
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 11:09:54 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Jan 9, 1:12 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message

...
On Jan 9, 1:24 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:



wrote in message

.. .

On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 19:22:01 -0800, JR North
wrote:

Mebbe you would change your mind if somone shot a harpoon into you.
JR

Mebbe YOU would change your mind if someone rammed your boat because
you were fishing.
There are plenty of PETA folks who think that is cruel to the fish,
deplete the seas and whatever

From what I heard, the Whale Wars boat boat was not moving. It was
rammed.
Are you really trying to defend the Japanese whaling industry??

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100106/...rctica_whaling

Even if the WW boat was still moving isn't it at a minimum _both_
boats'
fault? That's how I read the laws involved.

--
Nom=de=Plume
This vid looks to me like it was moving right along the side of the
Japanese fisherman then decided to cut across the bow and got clipped:

http://news.yahoo.com/video/world-15749633/17481983

A couple of things... First, this vid is from the Japanese perspective,
so
it can't be considered definitive. Second, the WW mother ship probably
has
contradictory vid that we haven't seen - I read they have five camera
angles. Third, both sides are obligated to avoid a collision, and since
the
Japanese and the WW boat could take action to do that, both should be at
fault.

--
Nom=de=Plume

What a dip. Have you ever heard of 'maneuverability'? Your knowledge
of maritime law is eclipsed only by...

Yes, but there's no indication that the Japanese boat even tried. It's not
like it was heavy fog or they didn't know the other boat was around.

Can't think of anything.

Pretty much sums up your "thinking."

What 'signs' are you looking for? Do you expect a ship that big to
show 'signs' in about 4 seconds?

I knew I had you filtered for a reason.
--

John H

"My reading of history convinces me that most bad government
results from too much government."

Thomas Jefferson


Four seconds??? Where did that number come from? The WW boat has been around
the Japanese fleet for weeks/months.

Please, please filter me! You're just too odd.

Four seconds was about the reaction time the whaler had when the
little boat turned into his path.

Dense? I guess so.

Bye.
--

John H

"My reading of history convinces me that most bad government
results from too much government."

Thomas Jefferson

On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 11:30:43 -0800 (PST), "*e#c"
wrote:

On Jan 9, 2:28*pm, John H wrote:
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 11:09:54 -0800, "nom=de=plume"



wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...
On Jan 9, 1:12 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message

...
On Jan 9, 1:24 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

wrote in message

.. .

On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 19:22:01 -0800, JR North
wrote:

Mebbe you would change your mind if somone shot a harpoon into you.
JR

Mebbe YOU would change your mind if someone rammed your boat because
you were fishing.
There are plenty of PETA folks who think that is cruel to the fish,
deplete the seas and whatever

From what I heard, the Whale Wars boat boat was not moving. It was
rammed.
Are you really trying to defend the Japanese whaling industry??

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100106/...rctica_whaling

Even if the WW boat was still moving isn't it at a minimum _both_ boats'
fault? That's how I read the laws involved.

--
Nom=de=Plume
This vid looks to me like it was moving right along the side of the
Japanese fisherman then decided to cut across the bow and got clipped:

http://news.yahoo.com/video/world-15749633/17481983

A couple of things... First, this vid is from the Japanese perspective, so
it can't be considered definitive. Second, the WW mother ship probably has
contradictory vid that we haven't seen - I read they have five camera
angles. Third, both sides are obligated to avoid a collision, and since
the
Japanese and the WW boat could take action to do that, both should be at
fault.

--
Nom=de=Plume

What a dip. Have you ever heard of 'maneuverability'? Your knowledge
of maritime law is eclipsed only by...

Yes, but there's no indication that the Japanese boat even tried. It's not
like it was heavy fog or they didn't know the other boat was around.

Can't think of anything.

Pretty much sums up your "thinking."

What 'signs' are you looking for? Do you expect a ship that big to
show 'signs' in about 4 seconds?

I knew I had you filtered for a reason.
--

John H

"My reading of history convinces me that most bad government
results from too much government."

Thomas Jefferson

"Filtered", and still reading her posts...what a liar.

I unfiltered her when we were discussing the greening of my electric
bill. She'd rather invest in an Al Gore scheme.

Why don't you go spoof someone. You let us know you're true self when
you do so, just like Harry does.
--

John H

"My reading of history convinces me that most bad government
results from too much government."

Thomas Jefferson

Don White wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"John H" wrote in message
...
On Jan 9, 1:12 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message

...
On Jan 9, 1:24 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:



wrote in message
...
On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 19:22:01 -0800, JR North
wrote:
Mebbe you would change your mind if somone shot a harpoon into you.
JR
Mebbe YOU would change your mind if someone rammed your boat because
you were fishing.
There are plenty of PETA folks who think that is cruel to the fish,
deplete the seas and whatever
From what I heard, the Whale Wars boat boat was not moving. It was
rammed.
Are you really trying to defend the Japanese whaling industry??
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100106/...rctica_whaling
Even if the WW boat was still moving isn't it at a minimum _both_
boats'
fault? That's how I read the laws involved.
--
Nom=de=Plume
This vid looks to me like it was moving right along the side of the
Japanese fisherman then decided to cut across the bow and got clipped:
http://news.yahoo.com/video/world-15749633/17481983
A couple of things... First, this vid is from the Japanese perspective,
so
it can't be considered definitive. Second, the WW mother ship probably
has
contradictory vid that we haven't seen - I read they have five camera
angles. Third, both sides are obligated to avoid a collision, and since
the
Japanese and the WW boat could take action to do that, both should be at
fault.

--
Nom=de=Plume
What a dip. Have you ever heard of 'maneuverability'? Your knowledge
of maritime law is eclipsed only by...
Yes, but there's no indication that the Japanese boat even tried. It's not
like it was heavy fog or they didn't know the other boat was around.

Can't think of anything.
Pretty much sums up your "thinking."

--
Nom=de=Plume


~~ Snerk ~~ You tell him sister!


She's your sister? That explains why she is so smartless.

nom=de=plume wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message
...
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"John H" wrote in message
...
On Jan 9, 1:12 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message

...
On Jan 9, 1:24 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:



wrote in message
...
On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 19:22:01 -0800, JR North
wrote:
Mebbe you would change your mind if somone shot a harpoon into you.
JR
Mebbe YOU would change your mind if someone rammed your boat because
you were fishing.
There are plenty of PETA folks who think that is cruel to the fish,
deplete the seas and whatever
From what I heard, the Whale Wars boat boat was not moving. It was
rammed.
Are you really trying to defend the Japanese whaling industry??
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100106/...rctica_whaling
Even if the WW boat was still moving isn't it at a minimum _both_
boats'
fault? That's how I read the laws involved.
--
Nom=de=Plume
This vid looks to me like it was moving right along the side of the
Japanese fisherman then decided to cut across the bow and got clipped:
http://news.yahoo.com/video/world-15749633/17481983
A couple of things... First, this vid is from the Japanese perspective,
so
it can't be considered definitive. Second, the WW mother ship probably
has
contradictory vid that we haven't seen - I read they have five camera
angles. Third, both sides are obligated to avoid a collision, and since
the
Japanese and the WW boat could take action to do that, both should be at
fault.

--
Nom=de=Plume
What a dip. Have you ever heard of 'maneuverability'? Your knowledge
of maritime law is eclipsed only by...
Yes, but there's no indication that the Japanese boat even tried. It's
not like it was heavy fog or they didn't know the other boat was around.

Can't think of anything.
Pretty much sums up your "thinking."

--
Nom=de=Plume

~~ Snerk ~~ You tell him sister!

And, I'm not a maritime attorney even...

You aren't even a boater.

nom=de=plume wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
news
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 11:09:54 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Jan 9, 1:12 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message

...
On Jan 9, 1:24 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:



wrote in message
...
On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 19:22:01 -0800, JR North
wrote:
Mebbe you would change your mind if somone shot a harpoon into you.
JR
Mebbe YOU would change your mind if someone rammed your boat because
you were fishing.
There are plenty of PETA folks who think that is cruel to the fish,
deplete the seas and whatever
From what I heard, the Whale Wars boat boat was not moving. It was
rammed.
Are you really trying to defend the Japanese whaling industry??
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100106/...rctica_whaling
Even if the WW boat was still moving isn't it at a minimum _both_
boats'
fault? That's how I read the laws involved.
--
Nom=de=Plume
This vid looks to me like it was moving right along the side of the
Japanese fisherman then decided to cut across the bow and got clipped:
http://news.yahoo.com/video/world-15749633/17481983
A couple of things... First, this vid is from the Japanese perspective,
so
it can't be considered definitive. Second, the WW mother ship probably
has
contradictory vid that we haven't seen - I read they have five camera
angles. Third, both sides are obligated to avoid a collision, and since
the
Japanese and the WW boat could take action to do that, both should be at
fault.

--
Nom=de=Plume
What a dip. Have you ever heard of 'maneuverability'? Your knowledge
of maritime law is eclipsed only by...
Yes, but there's no indication that the Japanese boat even tried. It's not
like it was heavy fog or they didn't know the other boat was around.

Can't think of anything.
Pretty much sums up your "thinking."
What 'signs' are you looking for? Do you expect a ship that big to
show 'signs' in about 4 seconds?

I knew I had you filtered for a reason.
--

John H

"My reading of history convinces me that most bad government
results from too much government."

Thomas Jefferson


Four seconds??? Where did that number come from? The WW boat has been around
the Japanese fleet for weeks/months.

Please, please filter me! You're just too odd.


Now you are crossing boundaries. We don't filter you just because you
are flat chested, do we?

nom=de=plume wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message
...
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"John H" wrote in message
...
On Jan 9, 1:12 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message

...
On Jan 9, 1:24 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:



wrote in message
...
On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 19:22:01 -0800, JR North
wrote:
Mebbe you would change your mind if somone shot a harpoon into you.
JR
Mebbe YOU would change your mind if someone rammed your boat because
you were fishing.
There are plenty of PETA folks who think that is cruel to the fish,
deplete the seas and whatever
From what I heard, the Whale Wars boat boat was not moving. It was
rammed.
Are you really trying to defend the Japanese whaling industry??
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100106/...rctica_whaling
Even if the WW boat was still moving isn't it at a minimum _both_
boats'
fault? That's how I read the laws involved.
--
Nom=de=Plume
This vid looks to me like it was moving right along the side of the
Japanese fisherman then decided to cut across the bow and got clipped:
http://news.yahoo.com/video/world-15749633/17481983
A couple of things... First, this vid is from the Japanese perspective,
so
it can't be considered definitive. Second, the WW mother ship probably
has
contradictory vid that we haven't seen - I read they have five camera
angles. Third, both sides are obligated to avoid a collision, and since
the
Japanese and the WW boat could take action to do that, both should be at
fault.

--
Nom=de=Plume
What a dip. Have you ever heard of 'maneuverability'? Your knowledge
of maritime law is eclipsed only by...
Yes, but there's no indication that the Japanese boat even tried. It's
not like it was heavy fog or they didn't know the other boat was around.

Can't think of anything.
Pretty much sums up your "thinking."

--
Nom=de=Plume

~~ Snerk ~~ You tell him sister!

And, I'm not a maritime attorney even...


yeah, but you are one sexy moma

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 12:02:36 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
news
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 11:09:54 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Jan 9, 1:12 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message

...
On Jan 9, 1:24 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:



wrote in message

.. .

On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 19:22:01 -0800, JR North
wrote:

Mebbe you would change your mind if somone shot a harpoon into
you.
JR

Mebbe YOU would change your mind if someone rammed your boat
because
you were fishing.
There are plenty of PETA folks who think that is cruel to the
fish,
deplete the seas and whatever

From what I heard, the Whale Wars boat boat was not moving. It was
rammed.
Are you really trying to defend the Japanese whaling industry??

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100106/...rctica_whaling

Even if the WW boat was still moving isn't it at a minimum _both_
boats'
fault? That's how I read the laws involved.

--
Nom=de=Plume
This vid looks to me like it was moving right along the side of the
Japanese fisherman then decided to cut across the bow and got
clipped:

http://news.yahoo.com/video/world-15749633/17481983

A couple of things... First, this vid is from the Japanese
perspective,
so
it can't be considered definitive. Second, the WW mother ship probably
has
contradictory vid that we haven't seen - I read they have five camera
angles. Third, both sides are obligated to avoid a collision, and
since
the
Japanese and the WW boat could take action to do that, both should be
at
fault.

--
Nom=de=Plume

What a dip. Have you ever heard of 'maneuverability'? Your knowledge
of maritime law is eclipsed only by...

Yes, but there's no indication that the Japanese boat even tried. It's
not
like it was heavy fog or they didn't know the other boat was around.

Can't think of anything.

Pretty much sums up your "thinking."

What 'signs' are you looking for? Do you expect a ship that big to
show 'signs' in about 4 seconds?

I knew I had you filtered for a reason.
--

John H

"My reading of history convinces me that most bad government
results from too much government."

Thomas Jefferson


Four seconds??? Where did that number come from? The WW boat has been
around
the Japanese fleet for weeks/months.

Please, please filter me! You're just too odd.

Four seconds was about the reaction time the whaler had when the
little boat turned into his path.

Dense? I guess so.


BS.. they had weeks to figure out how to avoid the other boats.

Dense, you betcha you are.
--
Nom=de=Plume