Don White wrote:
In article , naled24511
@mypacks.net says...
wrote:
On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 12:05:45 -0800 (PST), Frogwatch
wrote:

I have a tattoo. As far as I'm concerned anyone with the handle
"frogwatch" is just a dumbass.
I can change my usenet name.
We have seen you do it You are a girl sometime ;-)

He's not the only one...herring changes his ID frequently, as do sw tom,
DK, loogy, and, of course, flajim, who in addition to being jim, tries
to be me. Sadly, he cannot read, write, or reason.

**Jackass Alert**

Yes indeed. The from line in your header told us that

--
If it's not posted with a mac, it's the real deal.

"Don White" wrote in message
...
In article , naled24511
@mypacks.net says...

wrote:
On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 12:05:45 -0800 (PST), Frogwatch
wrote:

I have a tattoo. As far as I'm concerned anyone with the handle
"frogwatch" is just a dumbass.
I can change my usenet name.

We have seen you do it You are a girl sometime ;-)


He's not the only one...herring changes his ID frequently, as do sw tom,
DK, loogy, and, of course, flajim, who in addition to being jim, tries
to be me. Sadly, he cannot read, write, or reason.

**Jackass Alert**


Cheap imitation!

jamesgangnc wrote:
On Jan 4, 2:47 pm, Frogwatch wrote:
Yesterday, I saw a pretty young girl. Then she bent over revealing
her back just above her jeans. She had a tattoo there. I did not
even bother to look at her anymore cuz I figure she is simply too
stupid to bother with and tattoos on chicks in any form are basically
ugly.
Of course, I think ANY tattoo on anybody is basically stupid. I've
heard, "it expresses my individuality" when they really mean, "It says
my shoe size is more'n my IQ". A Tattoo on anybody tells me the person
has not thought beyond next week. IF I see somebody with a tattoo, I
pay no more attention to what the person says as I consider them to
simply be stupid.
As far as I am concerned, all tattoos spell "D U M B A S S"

I have a tattoo. As far as I'm concerned anyone with the handle
"frogwatch" is just a dumbass.

Are you an idiot or a low class whore?

Frogwatch wrote:
Yesterday, I saw a pretty young girl. Then she bent over revealing
her back just above her jeans. She had a tattoo there. I did not
even bother to look at her anymore cuz I figure she is simply too
stupid to bother with and tattoos on chicks in any form are basically
ugly.
Of course, I think ANY tattoo on anybody is basically stupid. I've
heard, "it expresses my individuality" when they really mean, "It says
my shoe size is more'n my IQ". A Tattoo on anybody tells me the person
has not thought beyond next week. IF I see somebody with a tattoo, I
pay no more attention to what the person says as I consider them to
simply be stupid.
As far as I am concerned, all tattoos spell "D U M B A S S"


You are provably insane and you are worried about tattoos?

He is not worried about tattoos, he is just expressing an opinion. Tattoo wearers start the discussion by wearing their tattoos. If someone were to wear a t-shirt with a message then they are throwing that out there for discussion. If someone were to wear a ridiculous fashion it is the same thing. It is very childish to pretend one gets a tattoo for any purpose other than to have it seen by others, especially those tattoos not covered by clothing.. You just are not going to win that argument. Tattoos are attention seeking devices for the pathetically desperate. In days past they were a device to signify to others that one belonged to a particular group and that one was loyal and had solidarity with that group. They were simply a branding and did not require a lot of space nor flamboyant artistry. When one was a sailor, merchant marine, soldier, or mafia then one was usually in that profession for life. Tattoos without connection to something concrete are meaningless, pursued by people who have not found a meaning to their lives. They therefore brand the wearers as meaningless, shallow people, in otherwords, IDIOTS.

"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
Yesterday, I saw a pretty young girl. Then she bent over revealing
her back just above her jeans. She had a tattoo there. I did not
even bother to look at her anymore cuz I figure she is simply too
stupid to bother with and tattoos on chicks in any form are basically
ugly.
Of course, I think ANY tattoo on anybody is basically stupid. I've
heard, "it expresses my individuality" when they really mean, "It says
my shoe size is more'n my IQ". A Tattoo on anybody tells me the person
has not thought beyond next week. IF I see somebody with a tattoo, I
pay no more attention to what the person says as I consider them to
simply be stupid.
As far as I am concerned, all tattoos spell "D U M B A S S"

What a snob! I have a small tattoo on my right arm, the folly of an eighteen
year old GI on leave on my birthday. Now retired at age 72, after heading up
three different service agencies, that provides me a nice retirement, I
hardly think "dumbass" is an appropriate adjective or noun.

However, "dumbass" is an apt descriptor for anyone who judges the measure of
a man or woman on a single criteria as inane as a tattoo.

On Jan 4, 1:47*pm, Frogwatch wrote:
Yesterday, I saw a pretty young girl. *Then she bent over revealing
her back just above her jeans. *She had a tattoo there. *

A "tramp stamp?"

Tim wrote:
On Jan 4, 1:47 pm, Frogwatch wrote:
Yesterday, I saw a pretty young girl. Then she bent over revealing
her back just above her jeans. She had a tattoo there.

A "tramp stamp?"
"Ass antlers"

In article ,
says...

Tim wrote:
On Jan 4, 1:47 pm, Frogwatch wrote:
Yesterday, I saw a pretty young girl. Then she bent over revealing
her back just above her jeans. She had a tattoo there.

A "tramp stamp?"
"Ass antlers"

Handle bars.

On Jan 4, 4:12*pm, Jim wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Jan 4, 1:47 pm, Frogwatch wrote:
Yesterday, I saw a pretty young girl. *Then she bent over revealing
her back just above her jeans. *She had a tattoo there. *

A "tramp stamp?"

"Ass antlers"

http://ugliesttattoos.com/tag/tramp-stamps/