On Jan 7, 9:32*am, Jim wrote:
NotNow wrote:
In article ,
says...
NotNow wrote:
In article ,
says...
Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 4, 6:00 pm, John H wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:50:16 -0500, Gene

wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:33:36 -0500, John H
wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:24:21 -0500, Gene
wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:03:48 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
A sadder thing is the "intelligence" community dropping the ball, yet
again....
Obama's intelligence communty?
No. Can't happen.
Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001
that we were actually attacked on our own soil?
Clinton's.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
So, lemme see. Clinton knew all about it, but Bush didn't know a thing
about it??
Is that what you are implying?
I think I see your problem You have a reading comprehension deficit
similar to Harry's.
So how do you comprehend the statement that 911 was the fault of
Clinton?
Who are you quoting?

John Herring. But that's not the point. When someone asked:

"Whose intelligence community dropped the ball so profoundly in 2001
that we were actually attacked on our own soil?"

And John Herring replied:
"Clinton"

I asked how Clinton knew all about it, but Bush didn't know a thing, how
is that? The reason I ask is that every time someone says that Bush knew
about 911 before it happened, the right wing comes out in droves and
says that's not true. SO, how is it that Clinton knew (according to
John) and Bush didn't?
To that, you claim I have a problem with comprehension? For asking a
QUESTION? Oh, and I've not gotten an answer to that question, for some
odd reason.....

Here's your answer. Maybe Clinton knew. Maybe Clinton was too
embarrassed to tell Bush about it. Maybe Clinton was afraid that Bush
would ask why Clinton didn't do anything about it. Clinton isn't the
most honest person on the planet you know.

If Clinton knew, then intel knew. If intel knew, then Bush knew.