On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 10:09:16 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:02:20 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 06:53:02 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker
wrote:

" Now, Hannity didn't like this answer, so he
asked "but does this mean that man is causing global warming?" The
weather guy answered "No, it doesn't, but it doesn't mean that man has
NOT caused global warming..."

Talk about stupid comments...

Depends on what's most important, job security or integrity.
Fox doesn't take kindly to those who disagree with the memo.
Accu-Weather can be replaced.
Plenty of other weather outfits.

--Vic

Yeah, when I want both sides of an issue I don't turn of FOX where there
are always representatives from both sides, I turn on MSNBC or NPR and
hear both sides from one point of view... That's funny Vic... So answer
the question Saran didn't, where do you get your news?

Mostly cable TV. Fox, C-Span, CNN, MSNBC.
But I also read actual legislation and random political commentary on
the internet.
I leave the scientific stuff to the scientists.
They'll work it out.
You saying Fox is neutral on the global warming stuff?
I don't get that impression. The memo has been distributed.
Talking heads reading what they're told to read from the prompter.
Lots of blondes. Real climate scientists right there. Oh yeah.
And nobody here strikes me as a ****ing climate scientist either.
I don't care what side they take.
Bet some are lucky enough to keep their boats afloat.
Some real good cut-and-pasters though.
Sorry. That's how I see it. No offense.
But I won't go so far as to act like those Senators do to people they
despise, and say "My dear friend and colleague."
Hehe. You know what I mean.

--Vic