On Dec 18, 5:13*pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 08:52:58 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker

wrote:
No. There was no message.

LOL!! Dude - the Hannity screed was one huge blast against a
messenger.

No. Not at all. It was an actual dialogue between Hannity and the
Accuweather founder.

Look, you're on the wrong side of this issue - you know it, you just
don't want to accept it.

The "science" isn't "settled" because it's based on a fraudulent
premise with amateur data mining done by amateur programmers to fit an
agenda that created a job worth millions. *Your guys have been proven
wrong on so many climate issues that it should be embarrassing.

And please don't do your usual prove a negative schtick - it's really
old.

Every time someone here shows you actual data that shows FOR A FACT
the direct correlation between CO2 levels and warming trends you sweep
it under the carpet, saying that the only "honest science" is that the
fits your right wing agenda.