On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 22:27:42 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:13:59 -0500, Gene
wrote:

On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:02:20 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 06:53:02 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker
wrote:

" Now, Hannity didn't like this answer, so he
asked "but does this mean that man is causing global warming?" The
weather guy answered "No, it doesn't, but it doesn't mean that man has
NOT caused global warming..."

Talk about stupid comments...

I think that was probably a mis-quote....

No - it wasn't. My friend Bassy had it right because I read about this
exchange on a alarmist blog so it's accurate.


I don't think *anybody*,
except a poster or two here, has ever said that man was the sole cause
of "global warming."

Hmmm - ok, if that's your perception - it's not mine.

Global temperature change has a historical record extending into the
period predating man, so to say "man caused global warming" is just
stupid.

Yep.

It would be equally ignorant to dismiss, out of hand, that man
couldn't have any effect on global temperatures. The real question is
whether man can create a tipping point.

Well that is the debate and so far, now that the truth is starting to
emerge, it would appear that AGW is a farce.

If we could get the oil companies, greedy scientists, and the
politicians out of the way...... then get some good and honest science
going..... maybe we'd know what is really going on.....

The real honest science is being done by those outside the climate
clique - guys like McIntyre who, oddly, view it the same way you do -
he just wants to get the science right.

Which, when viewed through history's prism, if the way it usually is -
the established "science" is tosed about by mavericks who want to say
"hey - wait a minute".

You'll wait for honest data while realists watch the polar caps melt.