"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"Loogypicker" wrote in message
...
On Dec 18, 1:54 pm, "Bill McKee" wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message

...





"Bill McKee" wrote in message
om...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
news:BoSdndoe8s31T7fWnZ2dnUVZ_vmdnZ2d@earthlink .com...
When you build on the cliffs overlooking the ocean.
http://www.kron4.com/News/ArticleVie...26/ArticleID/4...

Unfortunate for these people, but your claim that it isn't global
warming caused (or the opposite argument that it is) is
meaningless,
since any one event isn't proof or disproof of the fact of
adverse
climate change caused by humans.

--
Nom=de=Plume

It is building within 100' of a the edge of sandstone cliffs. With
a
pounding sea always there. About 10 years. maybe 20, they lost a
whole
set of homes in to the sea just up the road.

And your point? Are you making an argument for or against adverse
climate
change?

--
Nom=de=Plume

The climate is always changing. 10,000 years ago, Tahoe area was deep
in an
ice age. Glaciers, etc. 50,000 years ago, was probably a warm swamp.
The
fact is the climate is always in flux. But those like Al Gore, etc.
are
using that change to make more millions off the people they claim to
help.
Selling Carbon Credits? Man being the cause of the major climate
change is
lunacy.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

If it is "lunacy", Bill, please show me what evidence you have that
man has had nothing to do with THIS CURRENT warming period.

Reply:
You show me where man is the cause.



That's been shown over and over. Why don't you just answer his
question.

--
Nom=de=Plume


It has been shown? Fudged, cherry picked data, no one outside the lab
allowed to review the data. Ain't crap been shown. Actually has only
been crap shown as man caused global warming.

Not much knowledge about science I see. You are poorly informed. I
suggest stop listening to the Intelligent Design folks and the other
wackos.

--
Nom=de=Plume


I see from your statement, that if you did graduate college, it was not in
the hard science disciplines.

I see you're mistaken. I was a double major... biology and English lit. The
former is one of the requirements for being a patent attorney.

I also see that you have no logical argument, thus your pathetic attempt to
put me down.

Man up Bill.

--
Nom=de=Plume

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"Loogypicker" wrote in message
...
On Dec 18, 1:54 pm, "Bill McKee" wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message

...





"Bill McKee" wrote in message
om...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
news:BoSdndoe8s31T7fWnZ2dnUVZ_vmdnZ2d@earthlink .com...
When you build on the cliffs overlooking the ocean.
http://www.kron4.com/News/ArticleVie...26/ArticleID/4...

Unfortunate for these people, but your claim that it isn't
global
warming caused (or the opposite argument that it is) is
meaningless,
since any one event isn't proof or disproof of the fact of
adverse
climate change caused by humans.

--
Nom=de=Plume

It is building within 100' of a the edge of sandstone cliffs.
With a
pounding sea always there. About 10 years. maybe 20, they lost a
whole
set of homes in to the sea just up the road.

And your point? Are you making an argument for or against adverse
climate
change?

--
Nom=de=Plume

The climate is always changing. 10,000 years ago, Tahoe area was
deep in an
ice age. Glaciers, etc. 50,000 years ago, was probably a warm swamp.
The
fact is the climate is always in flux. But those like Al Gore, etc.
are
using that change to make more millions off the people they claim to
help.
Selling Carbon Credits? Man being the cause of the major climate
change is
lunacy.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

If it is "lunacy", Bill, please show me what evidence you have that
man has had nothing to do with THIS CURRENT warming period.

Reply:
You show me where man is the cause.



That's been shown over and over. Why don't you just answer his
question.

--
Nom=de=Plume


It has been shown? Fudged, cherry picked data, no one outside the lab
allowed to review the data. Ain't crap been shown. Actually has only
been crap shown as man caused global warming.

Not much knowledge about science I see. You are poorly informed. I
suggest stop listening to the Intelligent Design folks and the other
wackos.

--
Nom=de=Plume


I see from your statement, that if you did graduate college, it was not
in the hard science disciplines.

I see you're mistaken. I was a double major... biology and English lit.
The former is one of the requirements for being a patent attorney.

I also see that you have no logical argument, thus your pathetic attempt
to put me down.

Man up Bill.

--
Nom=de=Plume


But you were not a patent attorney. You did patent searches.

"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"Loogypicker" wrote in message
...
On Dec 18, 1:54 pm, "Bill McKee"
wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message

...





"Bill McKee" wrote in message
om...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
news:BoSdndoe8s31T7fWnZ2dnUVZ_vmdnZ2d@earthlink .com...
When you build on the cliffs overlooking the ocean.
http://www.kron4.com/News/ArticleVie...26/ArticleID/4...

Unfortunate for these people, but your claim that it isn't
global
warming caused (or the opposite argument that it is) is
meaningless,
since any one event isn't proof or disproof of the fact of
adverse
climate change caused by humans.

--
Nom=de=Plume

It is building within 100' of a the edge of sandstone cliffs.
With a
pounding sea always there. About 10 years. maybe 20, they lost a
whole
set of homes in to the sea just up the road.

And your point? Are you making an argument for or against adverse
climate
change?

--
Nom=de=Plume

The climate is always changing. 10,000 years ago, Tahoe area was
deep in an
ice age. Glaciers, etc. 50,000 years ago, was probably a warm
swamp. The
fact is the climate is always in flux. But those like Al Gore, etc.
are
using that change to make more millions off the people they claim
to help.
Selling Carbon Credits? Man being the cause of the major climate
change is
lunacy.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

If it is "lunacy", Bill, please show me what evidence you have that
man has had nothing to do with THIS CURRENT warming period.

Reply:
You show me where man is the cause.



That's been shown over and over. Why don't you just answer his
question.

--
Nom=de=Plume


It has been shown? Fudged, cherry picked data, no one outside the lab
allowed to review the data. Ain't crap been shown. Actually has only
been crap shown as man caused global warming.

Not much knowledge about science I see. You are poorly informed. I
suggest stop listening to the Intelligent Design folks and the other
wackos.

--
Nom=de=Plume


I see from your statement, that if you did graduate college, it was not
in the hard science disciplines.

I see you're mistaken. I was a double major... biology and English lit.
The former is one of the requirements for being a patent attorney.

I also see that you have no logical argument, thus your pathetic attempt
to put me down.

Man up Bill.

--
Nom=de=Plume


But you were not a patent attorney. You did patent searches.



?? What the heck are you talking about? Anyone can do a patent search.

--
Nom=de=Plume

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"Loogypicker" wrote in message
...
On Dec 18, 1:54 pm, "Bill McKee"
wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message

...





"Bill McKee" wrote in message
om...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
news:BoSdndoe8s31T7fWnZ2dnUVZ_vmdnZ2d@earthlink .com...
When you build on the cliffs overlooking the ocean.
http://www.kron4.com/News/ArticleVie...26/ArticleID/4...

Unfortunate for these people, but your claim that it isn't
global
warming caused (or the opposite argument that it is) is
meaningless,
since any one event isn't proof or disproof of the fact of
adverse
climate change caused by humans.

--
Nom=de=Plume

It is building within 100' of a the edge of sandstone cliffs.
With a
pounding sea always there. About 10 years. maybe 20, they lost
a whole
set of homes in to the sea just up the road.

And your point? Are you making an argument for or against
adverse climate
change?

--
Nom=de=Plume

The climate is always changing. 10,000 years ago, Tahoe area was
deep in an
ice age. Glaciers, etc. 50,000 years ago, was probably a warm
swamp. The
fact is the climate is always in flux. But those like Al Gore,
etc. are
using that change to make more millions off the people they claim
to help.
Selling Carbon Credits? Man being the cause of the major climate
change is
lunacy.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

If it is "lunacy", Bill, please show me what evidence you have that
man has had nothing to do with THIS CURRENT warming period.

Reply:
You show me where man is the cause.



That's been shown over and over. Why don't you just answer his
question.

--
Nom=de=Plume


It has been shown? Fudged, cherry picked data, no one outside the
lab allowed to review the data. Ain't crap been shown. Actually has
only been crap shown as man caused global warming.

Not much knowledge about science I see. You are poorly informed. I
suggest stop listening to the Intelligent Design folks and the other
wackos.

--
Nom=de=Plume


I see from your statement, that if you did graduate college, it was not
in the hard science disciplines.

I see you're mistaken. I was a double major... biology and English lit.
The former is one of the requirements for being a patent attorney.

I also see that you have no logical argument, thus your pathetic attempt
to put me down.

Man up Bill.

--
Nom=de=Plume


But you were not a patent attorney. You did patent searches.



?? What the heck are you talking about? Anyone can do a patent search.

--
Nom=de=Plume


So you say you were a patent attorney?

"Bill McKee" wrote in message
...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"Loogypicker" wrote in message
...
On Dec 18, 1:54 pm, "Bill McKee"
wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message

...





"Bill McKee" wrote in message
om...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
news:BoSdndoe8s31T7fWnZ2dnUVZ_vmdnZ2d@earthlink .com...
When you build on the cliffs overlooking the ocean.
http://www.kron4.com/News/ArticleVie...26/ArticleID/4...

Unfortunate for these people, but your claim that it isn't
global
warming caused (or the opposite argument that it is) is
meaningless,
since any one event isn't proof or disproof of the fact of
adverse
climate change caused by humans.

--
Nom=de=Plume

It is building within 100' of a the edge of sandstone cliffs.
With a
pounding sea always there. About 10 years. maybe 20, they lost
a whole
set of homes in to the sea just up the road.

And your point? Are you making an argument for or against
adverse climate
change?

--
Nom=de=Plume

The climate is always changing. 10,000 years ago, Tahoe area was
deep in an
ice age. Glaciers, etc. 50,000 years ago, was probably a warm
swamp. The
fact is the climate is always in flux. But those like Al Gore,
etc. are
using that change to make more millions off the people they claim
to help.
Selling Carbon Credits? Man being the cause of the major climate
change is
lunacy.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

If it is "lunacy", Bill, please show me what evidence you have
that
man has had nothing to do with THIS CURRENT warming period.

Reply:
You show me where man is the cause.



That's been shown over and over. Why don't you just answer his
question.

--
Nom=de=Plume


It has been shown? Fudged, cherry picked data, no one outside the
lab allowed to review the data. Ain't crap been shown. Actually
has only been crap shown as man caused global warming.

Not much knowledge about science I see. You are poorly informed. I
suggest stop listening to the Intelligent Design folks and the other
wackos.

--
Nom=de=Plume


I see from your statement, that if you did graduate college, it was
not in the hard science disciplines.

I see you're mistaken. I was a double major... biology and English lit.
The former is one of the requirements for being a patent attorney.

I also see that you have no logical argument, thus your pathetic
attempt to put me down.

Man up Bill.

--
Nom=de=Plume


But you were not a patent attorney. You did patent searches.



?? What the heck are you talking about? Anyone can do a patent search.

--
Nom=de=Plume


So you say you were a patent attorney?



Not "were" - am. I do other things now, mostly. Sometimes I take on patent
work, but only for individuals.


--
Nom=de=Plume

nom=de=plume wrote:

I see from your statement, that if you did graduate college, it was not in
the hard science disciplines.

I see you're mistaken. I was a double major... biology and English lit. The
former is one of the requirements for being a patent attorney.

I also see that you have no logical argument, thus your pathetic attempt to
put me down.

Man up Bill.


You said nothing about degrees. So a patent attorney needs only a
biology degree?

"Rob" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:

I see from your statement, that if you did graduate college, it was not
in
the hard science disciplines.

I see you're mistaken. I was a double major... biology and English lit.
The
former is one of the requirements for being a patent attorney.

I also see that you have no logical argument, thus your pathetic attempt
to
put me down.

Man up Bill.


You said nothing about degrees. So a patent attorney needs only a biology
degree?




You need to have a bs in order to become a patent agent. Biology qualifies.
There are very specific requirements. I also have a JD/MBA also if that
makes you feel better. Thus, I'm a patent attorney, not just an agent. The
pass rate for the exam is about 40%.

Here's a link that'll boil it down for you in steps even you can
comprehend..

http://inventors.about.com/od/patent...t_Attorney.htm

I was category A with a bio degree.

http://patbar.com/FAQ-patent-bar-exam.shtml#data-18

--
Nom=de=Plume

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Rob" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:

I see from your statement, that if you did graduate college, it was not
in
the hard science disciplines.

I see you're mistaken. I was a double major... biology and English lit.
The
former is one of the requirements for being a patent attorney.

I also see that you have no logical argument, thus your pathetic attempt
to
put me down.

Man up Bill.


You said nothing about degrees. So a patent attorney needs only a
biology degree?




You need to have a bs in order to become a patent agent. Biology
qualifies. There are very specific requirements. I also have a JD/MBA also
if that makes you feel better. Thus, I'm a patent attorney, not just an
agent. The pass rate for the exam is about 40%.

Here's a link that'll boil it down for you in steps even you can
comprehend..

http://inventors.about.com/od/patent...t_Attorney.htm

I was category A with a bio degree.

http://patbar.com/FAQ-patent-bar-exam.shtml#data-18

--
Nom=de=Plume


When I was dealing with the patent attorney for my patent, I came to the
conclusion that patent attorney has to be one of the most boring, least
mentally stimulating endeavors a JD can get involved in.

On 12/20/09 5:56 PM, Bill McKee wrote:
wrote in message
...
wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:

I see from your statement, that if you did graduate college, it was not
in
the hard science disciplines.

I see you're mistaken. I was a double major... biology and English lit.
The
former is one of the requirements for being a patent attorney.

I also see that you have no logical argument, thus your pathetic attempt
to
put me down.

Man up Bill.


You said nothing about degrees. So a patent attorney needs only a
biology degree?




You need to have a bs in order to become a patent agent. Biology
qualifies. There are very specific requirements. I also have a JD/MBA also
if that makes you feel better. Thus, I'm a patent attorney, not just an
agent. The pass rate for the exam is about 40%.

Here's a link that'll boil it down for you in steps even you can
comprehend..

http://inventors.about.com/od/patent...t_Attorney.htm

I was category A with a bio degree.

http://patbar.com/FAQ-patent-bar-exam.shtml#data-18

--
Nom=de=Plume


When I was dealing with the patent attorney for my patent, I came to the
conclusion that patent attorney has to be one of the most boring, least
mentally stimulating endeavors a JD can get involved in.



To each his own, Bilious. I feel about the institution of the military
the way you feel about patent attorneys. I don't have the patience to be
a patent attorney, but I appreciate their worth to those who need them.

"Bill McKee" wrote in message
...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Rob" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:

I see from your statement, that if you did graduate college, it was
not in
the hard science disciplines.

I see you're mistaken. I was a double major... biology and English lit.
The
former is one of the requirements for being a patent attorney.

I also see that you have no logical argument, thus your pathetic
attempt to
put me down.

Man up Bill.


You said nothing about degrees. So a patent attorney needs only a
biology degree?




You need to have a bs in order to become a patent agent. Biology
qualifies. There are very specific requirements. I also have a JD/MBA
also if that makes you feel better. Thus, I'm a patent attorney, not just
an agent. The pass rate for the exam is about 40%.

Here's a link that'll boil it down for you in steps even you can
comprehend..

http://inventors.about.com/od/patent...t_Attorney.htm

I was category A with a bio degree.

http://patbar.com/FAQ-patent-bar-exam.shtml#data-18

--
Nom=de=Plume


When I was dealing with the patent attorney for my patent, I came to the
conclusion that patent attorney has to be one of the most boring, least
mentally stimulating endeavors a JD can get involved in.

Yes, I'm sure you came to that conclusion. All kidding aside, it actually
can be festinating work. Some patents are pretty mundane, not to diminish
them too much, but they can "solve" a problem that's a pretty small problem.
Some others, however, are really interesting, and I had an opportunity to
really use my bio degree to delve into the subject. In some cases, I was
able (as many patent professionals are capable of doing) to influence the
idea itself and certainly influence the time/effort required to get the
patent granted.

As I said somewhere else, I don't/won't work with corps any more. It wasn't
so much boring as frustrating.

--
Nom=de=Plume