Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Rob" wrote in message
... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP2p91dvm6M Obama wouldn't stand a chance against this guy. This guy has lots of great rhetoric but has proposed nothing of substance. -- Nom=de=Plume |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My local dog catcher will have a better chance than Obrother in 2012.
Count on it. Dale www.FishWisher.com |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"FishWisher" wrote in message
... My local dog catcher will have a better chance than Obrother in 2012. Count on it. Dale www.FishWisher.com I don't think I will. -- Nom=de=Plume |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 20:57:02 -0800 (PST), FishWisher
wrote: My local dog catcher will have a better chance than Obrother in 2012. Count on it. Dale www.FishWisher.com Don't you have some 50 year old sturgeon to slaughter today? |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:33:14 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "Rob" wrote in message m... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP2p91dvm6M Obama wouldn't stand a chance against this guy. This guy has lots of great rhetoric but has proposed nothing of substance. He explicated his idealogy, and he did so very well. Distinctly expressing an idealogy is necessary to help an electorate determine a whether a candidate is one worth voting for. -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
... On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:33:14 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Rob" wrote in message om... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP2p91dvm6M Obama wouldn't stand a chance against this guy. This guy has lots of great rhetoric but has proposed nothing of substance. He explicated his idealogy, and he did so very well. Distinctly expressing an idealogy is necessary to help an electorate determine a whether a candidate is one worth voting for. -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access "His idealogy" No substance, as I said. Do or do not words "count"? -- Nom=de=Plume |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:26:38 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: wrote in message .. . On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:33:14 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Rob" wrote in message news:Xf2dnf3jiL9U4rTWnZ2dnUVZ_udi4p2d@giganews. com... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP2p91dvm6M Obama wouldn't stand a chance against this guy. This guy has lots of great rhetoric but has proposed nothing of substance. He explicated his idealogy, and he did so very well. Distinctly expressing an idealogy is necessary to help an electorate determine a whether a candidate is one worth voting for. -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access "His idealogy" No substance, as I said. Do or do not words "count"? You're playing a game with semantics. An idealogy is an idealogy simply because it is substantive. Otherwise everything you or anyone else in this forum spews out is nothing more than a Lewis Carroll musing. For your own sake, you need to learn to be 'wrong' on occassion. -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
... On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:26:38 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message . .. On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:33:14 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Rob" wrote in message news:Xf2dnf3jiL9U4rTWnZ2dnUVZ_udi4p2d@giganews .com... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP2p91dvm6M Obama wouldn't stand a chance against this guy. This guy has lots of great rhetoric but has proposed nothing of substance. He explicated his idealogy, and he did so very well. Distinctly expressing an idealogy is necessary to help an electorate determine a whether a candidate is one worth voting for. -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access "His idealogy" No substance, as I said. Do or do not words "count"? You're playing a game with semantics. An idealogy is an idealogy simply because it is substantive. Otherwise everything you or anyone else in this forum spews out is nothing more than a Lewis Carroll musing. For your own sake, you need to learn to be 'wrong' on occassion. -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access No. Substance is actually making a proposal. He didn't do that. You're the one playing semantics. Perhaps you should follow your own perscription and "be wrong" occasionally. -- Nom=de=Plume |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
... On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:33:14 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Rob" wrote in message om... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP2p91dvm6M Obama wouldn't stand a chance against this guy. This guy has lots of great rhetoric but has proposed nothing of substance. Isn't that the definition of a politician? Not of a successful one, and certainly not these days. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Our next president | General | |||
Our next president! | General | |||
I am the President! | ASA | |||
( OT) Help your president | General | |||
( OT ) Do we have a gay president? | General |