| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Dec 16, 5:44*am, I am Tosk wrote:
In article , says... ...is it worth $29.95? Anyone use it? Supposedly it's good for amateurs like me. I would never use it. When I get clogged up I do a format and rebuild. Over the years I have probably averaged twice a year. I use it all of the time. Autodesk products such as Autocad and Revit Structure dump a LOT of crap in the registry. Registry Mechanic cleans it up in a few minutes. Adobe Acrobat does the same thing, by the way. |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 21:22:43 -0500, Gene
wrote: On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 05:44:31 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: In article , says... ...is it worth $29.95? Anyone use it? Supposedly it's good for amateurs like me. I would never use it. When I get clogged up I do a format and rebuild. Over the years I have probably averaged twice a year. As infinitely painful as it is.... this is the best advice. I've never had to do a reformat just to unclog a computer. Maybe I've just been lucky. -- John H |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 21:22:43 -0500, Gene
wrote: On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 05:44:31 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: In article , says... ...is it worth $29.95? Anyone use it? Supposedly it's good for amateurs like me. I would never use it. When I get clogged up I do a format and rebuild. Over the years I have probably averaged twice a year. As infinitely painful as it is.... this is the best advice. If you're a simple user like The Freak, I might agree. For those who have lots of applications they use and would have to reinstall, it's a bloody waste of time. Registry Mechanic does a decent job. Vista and Win 7 both do a good job of keeping the disc defragged. |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 12/17/09 11:45 AM, jps wrote:
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 21:22:43 -0500, Gene wrote: On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 05:44:31 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: In , om says... ...is it worth $29.95? Anyone use it? Supposedly it's good for amateurs like me. I would never use it. When I get clogged up I do a format and rebuild. Over the years I have probably averaged twice a year. As infinitely painful as it is.... this is the best advice. If you're a simple user like The Freak, I might agree. For those who have lots of applications they use and would have to reinstall, it's a bloody waste of time. Registry Mechanic does a decent job. Vista and Win 7 both do a good job of keeping the disc defragged. Two of the aspects of Windozes I don't miss: the registry the need to defrag hard drives There is no registry in the Apple OS, and it is pretty simple to remove a program and all its pieces and parts. Also, the OS seems to keep the drive(s) pretty much defragged on its own. Backups and restores are much easier, too. But I still like Windoze. |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Harry wrote:
On 12/17/09 11:45 AM, jps wrote: On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 21:22:43 -0500, Gene wrote: On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 05:44:31 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: In , om says... ...is it worth $29.95? Anyone use it? Supposedly it's good for amateurs like me. I would never use it. When I get clogged up I do a format and rebuild. Over the years I have probably averaged twice a year. As infinitely painful as it is.... this is the best advice. If you're a simple user like The Freak, I might agree. For those who have lots of applications they use and would have to reinstall, it's a bloody waste of time. Registry Mechanic does a decent job. Vista and Win 7 both do a good job of keeping the disc defragged. Two of the aspects of Windozes I don't miss: the registry the need to defrag hard drives There is no registry in the Apple OS, and it is pretty simple to remove a program and all its pieces and parts. Also, the OS seems to keep the drive(s) pretty much defragged on its own. Backups and restores are much easier, too. But I still like Windoze. I know I don't like Windoze Registry, and that is an integral aspect of Windoze, but after singing the praise of Vista, I am too embarrassed to say what i really think of Windoze. I have always hoped that people will forget that I switched to a Mac after 6 months of pucking with Vista. |
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:08:19 -0500, Gene
wrote: On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:52:29 -0500, Harry wrote: On 12/17/09 11:45 AM, jps wrote: On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 21:22:43 -0500, Gene wrote: On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 05:44:31 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: In , om says... ...is it worth $29.95? Anyone use it? Supposedly it's good for amateurs like me. I would never use it. When I get clogged up I do a format and rebuild. Over the years I have probably averaged twice a year. As infinitely painful as it is.... this is the best advice. If you're a simple user like The Freak, I might agree. For those who have lots of applications they use and would have to reinstall, it's a bloody waste of time. Registry Mechanic does a decent job. Vista and Win 7 both do a good job of keeping the disc defragged. Two of the aspects of Windozes I don't miss: the registry the need to defrag hard drives There is no registry in the Apple OS, and it is pretty simple to remove a program and all its pieces and parts. Also, the OS seems to keep the drive(s) pretty much defragged on its own. Backups and restores are much easier, too. But I still like Windoze. That's where I was headed with this.... defragging is a fragging waste of time.... better spend wiping and re-installing. You must have a very small number of apps. Defragging can be done while sleeping on an XP or earlier machine. Vista and 7 take care of it themselves. |
|
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:47:54 -0800, jps wrote:
You must have a very small number of apps. Defragging can be done while sleeping on an XP or earlier machine. Vista and 7 take care of it themselves. Haven't done that in a long time with my XP machines. In the pre-XP days I would do a backup to tape, then restore instead of defragging. The tape was written and restored/reindexed with data contiguous and ran in about 1/3 the time of a defrag. I restore from image occasionally now, and I'm not sure if Ghost re-indexes and shuffles the data back on the tracks more efficiently than what they were. Might, since the restore is always considerably faster than making the image. Defrag head seeking is inefficient as hell. --Vic |
| Reply |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| NOAA Saltwater Angler Registry | General | |||
| More on Federal Registry vs Saltwater license | General | |||
| More on National Fishery Registry.... | General | |||
| NC boat registry info? | General | |||
| Yacht Registry? | Cruising | |||