In article 686cae30-6816-4252-af98-75c3b1794408
@b15g2000yqd.googlegroups.com, says...

On Dec 17, 8:55*pm, Harry wrote:
On 12/17/09 8:54 PM, Eisboch wrote:





*wrote in message
om...
On 12/17/09 8:11 PM, Eisboch wrote:
* wrote in message
...

I think Dean is right. It should be handled as best as possible with
reconciliation.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconci...tates_Congress)

--
Nom=de=Plume

My understanding is that the reconciliation process is after a bill is
approved and is then
negotiated and adjusted with consideration to budgets. *You can't have
reconciliation on the
pertinent points of a bill during the voting process. *There's nothing to
reconciliate. (if that's a word)

Eisboch

"Reconciliate" is indeed a word, though a tad obscure. You can find it in
a proper dictionary.

That's me. *Obscure.

Better to be obscure than familiar.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Why don't YOU go be obscure instead of familiar then? Most of us here
would like that.

Because rec.boats is all I have, little schitt.

--
And now...back to flajim and others who are so obsessed with me, they
use my handle here.

In article 07536aba-258a-429a-8b0a-a6eaa61e2f10
@a21g2000yqc.googlegroups.com, says...

On Dec 17, 2:41*pm, John H wrote:
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:32:27 -0500, wrote:
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:24:55 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Loogypicker" wrote in message
...
On Dec 17, 7:03 am, John H wrote:
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 23:15:37 -0800, "Bill McKee"

wrote:

I am an equal opportunity disliker. Both the Republicans and the
Democrats
suck. At the present, the Democrats suck more as they are in control and
screwing us big time. How about Howard Dean's take on the health care
bill?

Hee, hee.

The Democrats are in a free fall, but 'Bama keeps blaming the
Republicans.

Pass the popcorn.
--

Have a Blessed Chrismahanukwanzakah and a Spectacular New Year!

John H

Your blind hatred still won't allow you to spell your president's name
correctly, huh? That's just sad.

Very sad... says a lot about John.

I will point out, you reap what you sow.
I remember the way the left mangled Bush's name.

Either you respect the office or personal attacks are fine, your
choice.

I have great respect for the office. It's the current occupant I find
somewhat problematic. I guess I'm just not in favor of the government
running everything. The Russians tried it, even added 'socialist' to
the name of their country. The folks who got ahead were not the common
folks, they were the politicians who had the good spots in the
government. Liberals just can't seem to understand that.
--

Have a Blessed Chrismahanukwanzakah and a Spectacular New Year!

John H- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

There you go. Lumping all liberals into you very narrow minded
definition.

You are the one who breaks everything into "liberal vs. conservative".
Take a look back..

In article ,
om says...

On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:16:01 -0600, thunder
wrote:

On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:34:22 -0500, John H wrote:


Yeah, and he hasn't noticed the Democrats falling numbers haven't shown
a corresponding rise in Republican numbers. I would say, what you are
seeing is a disgust in all things Washington, and they wonder why there
is voter apathy. If the Democrats don't pass adequate health care
reform, it will hurt them, but I see that as hurting the country, not
helping the "Party of No".

Don't be too sad. I'm OK.

If the Democrats would propose an adequate health care plan, it would
probably pass. To blame the non-passage on the Republicans is very
Reid-like, but also bull****.

If this health plan is so great, why hasn't it been made public? Why are
Republican senators prevented from seeing the bill?

Read this. It's from a liberal newspaper, so it must be true.

http://tinyurl.com/y8tlw2l

In the meantime, keep blaming the Republicans for the bill not passing.
Not even Howard Dean does that.

Read for content, John. I didn't blame the Republicans for the bill not
passing. The Republican party is irrelevant, and it will remain
irrelevant until they get there house in order. Pandering to their
"base", all 20% of the population, will keep them irrelevant.

You're right. I misread. I thought your reference to the "Party of No"
was a jab at Republicans. But it seems as if the Democrats are doing
it to themselves.

If the Democrats would propose an adequate health care bill it would
pass with support from both sides. It would also stand the test of
daylight.

I am sorry but it bugs me big time that no democrats are concerned about
the secret meetings and the lack of any time to review the biggest bill
in history. That has got to set off bells with even the lowest level
thinkers...

On 12/18/09 10:28 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In article07536aba-258a-429a-8b0a-a6eaa61e2f10
@a21g2000yqc.googlegroups.com, says...

On Dec 17, 2:41 pm, John wrote:
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:32:27 -0500, wrote:
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:24:55 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Dec 17, 7:03 am, John wrote:
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 23:15:37 -0800, "Bill McKee"

wrote:

I am an equal opportunity disliker. Both the Republicans and the
Democrats
suck. At the present, the Democrats suck more as they are in control and
screwing us big time. How about Howard Dean's take on the health care
bill?

Hee, hee.

The Democrats are in a free fall, but 'Bama keeps blaming the
Republicans.

Pass the popcorn.
--

Have a Blessed Chrismahanukwanzakah and a Spectacular New Year!

John H

Your blind hatred still won't allow you to spell your president's name
correctly, huh? That's just sad.

Very sad... says a lot about John.

I will point out, you reap what you sow.
I remember the way the left mangled Bush's name.

Either you respect the office or personal attacks are fine, your
choice.

I have great respect for the office. It's the current occupant I find
somewhat problematic. I guess I'm just not in favor of the government
running everything. The Russians tried it, even added 'socialist' to
the name of their country. The folks who got ahead were not the common
folks, they were the politicians who had the good spots in the
government. Liberals just can't seem to understand that.
--

Have a Blessed Chrismahanukwanzakah and a Spectacular New Year!

John H- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

There you go. Lumping all liberals into you very narrow minded
definition.

You are the one who breaks everything into "liberal vs. conservative".
Take a look back..



This is really funny...you, loogy, herring, and bilious bill...the
dumbed down horsemen of the apocalypse of the eternally stupid.

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:56:00 -0500, John H wrote:


If the Democrats would propose an adequate health care bill it would
pass with support from both sides. It would also stand the test of
daylight.

Garbage. "If we?re able to stop Obama on this it will be his Waterloo.
It will break him." Want to guess who said that? It doesn't sound much
like they are interested in health care, just interested in defeating
Obama.

Who said that? Rush? Really man, stop listening to blather radio... We
don't...

On 12/18/09 10:32 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In ,
om says...

On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:16:01 -0600,
wrote:

On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:34:22 -0500, John H wrote:


Yeah, and he hasn't noticed the Democrats falling numbers haven't shown
a corresponding rise in Republican numbers. I would say, what you are
seeing is a disgust in all things Washington, and they wonder why there
is voter apathy. If the Democrats don't pass adequate health care
reform, it will hurt them, but I see that as hurting the country, not
helping the "Party of No".

Don't be too sad. I'm OK.

If the Democrats would propose an adequate health care plan, it would
probably pass. To blame the non-passage on the Republicans is very
Reid-like, but also bull****.

If this health plan is so great, why hasn't it been made public? Why are
Republican senators prevented from seeing the bill?

Read this. It's from a liberal newspaper, so it must be true.

http://tinyurl.com/y8tlw2l

In the meantime, keep blaming the Republicans for the bill not passing.
Not even Howard Dean does that.

Read for content, John. I didn't blame the Republicans for the bill not
passing. The Republican party is irrelevant, and it will remain
irrelevant until they get there house in order. Pandering to their
"base", all 20% of the population, will keep them irrelevant.

You're right. I misread. I thought your reference to the "Party of No"
was a jab at Republicans. But it seems as if the Democrats are doing
it to themselves.

If the Democrats would propose an adequate health care bill it would
pass with support from both sides. It would also stand the test of
daylight.

I am sorry but it bugs me big time that no democrats are concerned about
the secret meetings and the lack of any time to review the biggest bill
in history. That has got to set off bells with even the lowest level
thinkers...


Why are you concerned? You don't have health insurance.

In article 9b703227-7553-4759-867f-14cd605552a9
@b15g2000yqd.googlegroups.com, says...

On Dec 17, 5:33*pm, thunder wrote:
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:56:00 -0500, John H wrote:
If the Democrats would propose an adequate health care bill it would
pass with support from both sides. It would also stand the test of
daylight.

Garbage. *"If we?re able to stop Obama on this it will be his Waterloo.
It will break him." *Want to guess who said that? *It doesn't sound much
like they are interested in health care, just interested in defeating
Obama.

Yes, indeed! That is all most of the republicans want. Hateful,
bigoted, intolerant.

Yeah, yeah, that's it, someone said it so it's how "you folks" all
feel!! Yeah, that's the ticket!!! snerk

On 12/18/09 10:32 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In inet,
says...

On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:56:00 -0500, John H wrote:


If the Democrats would propose an adequate health care bill it would
pass with support from both sides. It would also stand the test of
daylight.

Garbage. "If we?re able to stop Obama on this it will be his Waterloo.
It will break him." Want to guess who said that? It doesn't sound much
like they are interested in health care, just interested in defeating
Obama.

Who said that? Rush? Really man, stop listening to blather radio... We
don't...


A U.S. Senator, ****-for-brains. Jim Demint, from South Carolina, naturally.

On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:32:00 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:16:01 -0600, thunder
wrote:

On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:34:22 -0500, John H wrote:


Yeah, and he hasn't noticed the Democrats falling numbers haven't shown
a corresponding rise in Republican numbers. I would say, what you are
seeing is a disgust in all things Washington, and they wonder why there
is voter apathy. If the Democrats don't pass adequate health care
reform, it will hurt them, but I see that as hurting the country, not
helping the "Party of No".

Don't be too sad. I'm OK.

If the Democrats would propose an adequate health care plan, it would
probably pass. To blame the non-passage on the Republicans is very
Reid-like, but also bull****.

If this health plan is so great, why hasn't it been made public? Why are
Republican senators prevented from seeing the bill?

Read this. It's from a liberal newspaper, so it must be true.

http://tinyurl.com/y8tlw2l

In the meantime, keep blaming the Republicans for the bill not passing.
Not even Howard Dean does that.

Read for content, John. I didn't blame the Republicans for the bill not
passing. The Republican party is irrelevant, and it will remain
irrelevant until they get there house in order. Pandering to their
"base", all 20% of the population, will keep them irrelevant.

You're right. I misread. I thought your reference to the "Party of No"
was a jab at Republicans. But it seems as if the Democrats are doing
it to themselves.

If the Democrats would propose an adequate health care bill it would
pass with support from both sides. It would also stand the test of
daylight.

I am sorry but it bugs me big time that no democrats are concerned about
the secret meetings and the lack of any time to review the biggest bill
in history. That has got to set off bells with even the lowest level
thinkers...

They won't address the fact that the bill is kept hidden.

Yet they'll talk about Republicans 'blindly' doing this or that. If
pushing an unseen bill isn't 'blindly' following, then I don't know
what it.
--

Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!

John H

In article , naled24511
@mypacks.net says...

On 12/18/09 10:28 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In article07536aba-258a-429a-8b0a-a6eaa61e2f10
@a21g2000yqc.googlegroups.com, says...

On Dec 17, 2:41 pm, John wrote:
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:32:27 -0500, wrote:
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:24:55 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Dec 17, 7:03 am, John wrote:
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 23:15:37 -0800, "Bill McKee"

wrote:

I am an equal opportunity disliker. Both the Republicans and the
Democrats
suck. At the present, the Democrats suck more as they are in control and
screwing us big time. How about Howard Dean's take on the health care
bill?

Hee, hee.

The Democrats are in a free fall, but 'Bama keeps blaming the
Republicans.

Pass the popcorn.
--

Have a Blessed Chrismahanukwanzakah and a Spectacular New Year!

John H

Your blind hatred still won't allow you to spell your president's name
correctly, huh? That's just sad.

Very sad... says a lot about John.

I will point out, you reap what you sow.
I remember the way the left mangled Bush's name.

Either you respect the office or personal attacks are fine, your
choice.

I have great respect for the office. It's the current occupant I find
somewhat problematic. I guess I'm just not in favor of the government
running everything. The Russians tried it, even added 'socialist' to
the name of their country. The folks who got ahead were not the common
folks, they were the politicians who had the good spots in the
government. Liberals just can't seem to understand that.
--

Have a Blessed Chrismahanukwanzakah and a Spectacular New Year!

John H- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

There you go. Lumping all liberals into you very narrow minded
definition.

You are the one who breaks everything into "liberal vs. conservative".
Take a look back..



This is really funny...you, loogy, herring, and bilious bill...the
dumbed down horsemen of the apocalypse of the eternally stupid.

You are an impostor. I have guns and answer my door drawn and cocked.

--
And now...back to flajim and others who are so obsessed with me, they
use my handle here.