Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Harry" wrote in message ... On 12/16/09 4:54 PM, nom=de=plume wrote: "Bill wrote in message ... wrote in message ... wrote in message m... wrote in message ... "Bill wrote in message ... wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Dec 14, 9:17 pm, wrote: Then, I suggest you vote for Palin in 2012. Why? Since you seem to think Obama is so bad, the polar opposite would be Palin. -- Nom=de=Plume palin is not the President, and she should be more closely compared the VEEP. Biden. Talk about the Peter Principal. Exactly my point. Palin is not the President (or VP) THANK GOD! -- Nom=de=Plume Unfortunately we have what we got. Seems like he's trying to fix the mess Bush left. So, compared to what we could have gotten, I'm pretty happy. Of course, the "compared to" isn't saying much. At least he has a functioning brain. -- Nom=de=Plume But it is functioning more as a conduit for crap ideas. Sort of like yours? McKee is a reconstructed "dixiecrat" who didn't get the memo about switching to the GOP. I am an equal opportunity disliker. Both the Republicans and the Democrats suck. At the present, the Democrats suck more as they are in control and screwing us big time. How about Howard Dean's take on the health care bill? |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
... "Harry" wrote in message ... On 12/16/09 4:54 PM, nom=de=plume wrote: "Bill wrote in message ... wrote in message ... wrote in message m... wrote in message ... "Bill wrote in message ... wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Dec 14, 9:17 pm, wrote: Then, I suggest you vote for Palin in 2012. Why? Since you seem to think Obama is so bad, the polar opposite would be Palin. -- Nom=de=Plume palin is not the President, and she should be more closely compared the VEEP. Biden. Talk about the Peter Principal. Exactly my point. Palin is not the President (or VP) THANK GOD! -- Nom=de=Plume Unfortunately we have what we got. Seems like he's trying to fix the mess Bush left. So, compared to what we could have gotten, I'm pretty happy. Of course, the "compared to" isn't saying much. At least he has a functioning brain. -- Nom=de=Plume But it is functioning more as a conduit for crap ideas. Sort of like yours? McKee is a reconstructed "dixiecrat" who didn't get the memo about switching to the GOP. I am an equal opportunity disliker. Both the Republicans and the Democrats suck. At the present, the Democrats suck more as they are in control and screwing us big time. How about Howard Dean's take on the health care bill? I think Dean is right. It should be handled as best as possible with reconciliation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconci...tates_Congress) -- Nom=de=Plume |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... I think Dean is right. It should be handled as best as possible with reconciliation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconci...tates_Congress) -- Nom=de=Plume My understanding is that the reconciliation process is after a bill is approved and is then negotiated and adjusted with consideration to budgets. You can't have reconciliation on the pertinent points of a bill during the voting process. There's nothing to reconciliate. (if that's a word) Eisboch |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eisboch wrote:
wrote in message ... I think Dean is right. It should be handled as best as possible with reconciliation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconci...tates_Congress) -- Nom=de=Plume My understanding is that the reconciliation process is after a bill is approved and is then negotiated and adjusted with consideration to budgets. You can't have reconciliation on the pertinent points of a bill during the voting process. There's nothing to reconciliate. (if that's a word) Eisboch It's reconcile, but who's counting? Rob |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 17, 8:23*pm, Rob wrote:
Eisboch wrote: *wrote in message ... I think Dean is right. It should be handled as best as possible with reconciliation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconci...tates_Congress) -- Nom=de=Plume My understanding is that the reconciliation process is after a bill is approved and is then negotiated and adjusted with consideration to budgets. *You can't have reconciliation on the pertinent points of a bill during the voting process. *There's nothing to reconciliate. (if that's a word) Eisboch It's reconcile, but who's counting? Rob- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Don the rec.boats keystone cop of typos and spelling, that's who! |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12/17/09 8:11 PM, Eisboch wrote:
wrote in message ... I think Dean is right. It should be handled as best as possible with reconciliation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconci...tates_Congress) -- Nom=de=Plume My understanding is that the reconciliation process is after a bill is approved and is then negotiated and adjusted with consideration to budgets. You can't have reconciliation on the pertinent points of a bill during the voting process. There's nothing to reconciliate. (if that's a word) Eisboch "Reconciliate" is indeed a word, though a tad obscure. You can find it in a proper dictionary. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Harry" wrote in message m... On 12/17/09 8:11 PM, Eisboch wrote: wrote in message ... I think Dean is right. It should be handled as best as possible with reconciliation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconci...tates_Congress) -- Nom=de=Plume My understanding is that the reconciliation process is after a bill is approved and is then negotiated and adjusted with consideration to budgets. You can't have reconciliation on the pertinent points of a bill during the voting process. There's nothing to reconciliate. (if that's a word) Eisboch "Reconciliate" is indeed a word, though a tad obscure. You can find it in a proper dictionary. That's me. Obscure. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12/17/09 8:54 PM, Eisboch wrote:
wrote in message m... On 12/17/09 8:11 PM, Eisboch wrote: wrote in message ... I think Dean is right. It should be handled as best as possible with reconciliation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconci...tates_Congress) -- Nom=de=Plume My understanding is that the reconciliation process is after a bill is approved and is then negotiated and adjusted with consideration to budgets. You can't have reconciliation on the pertinent points of a bill during the voting process. There's nothing to reconciliate. (if that's a word) Eisboch "Reconciliate" is indeed a word, though a tad obscure. You can find it in a proper dictionary. That's me. Obscure. Better to be obscure than familiar. |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 17, 8:55*pm, Harry wrote:
On 12/17/09 8:54 PM, Eisboch wrote: *wrote in message om... On 12/17/09 8:11 PM, Eisboch wrote: * wrote in message ... I think Dean is right. It should be handled as best as possible with reconciliation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconci...tates_Congress) -- Nom=de=Plume My understanding is that the reconciliation process is after a bill is approved and is then negotiated and adjusted with consideration to budgets. *You can't have reconciliation on the pertinent points of a bill during the voting process. *There's nothing to reconciliate. (if that's a word) Eisboch "Reconciliate" is indeed a word, though a tad obscure. You can find it in a proper dictionary. That's me. *Obscure. Better to be obscure than familiar.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Why don't YOU go be obscure instead of familiar then? Most of us here would like that. |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 20:54:03 -0500, "Eisboch"
wrote: "Harry" wrote in message om... On 12/17/09 8:11 PM, Eisboch wrote: wrote in message ... I think Dean is right. It should be handled as best as possible with reconciliation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconci...tates_Congress) -- Nom=de=Plume My understanding is that the reconciliation process is after a bill is approved and is then negotiated and adjusted with consideration to budgets. You can't have reconciliation on the pertinent points of a bill during the voting process. There's nothing to reconciliate. (if that's a word) Eisboch "Reconciliate" is indeed a word, though a tad obscure. You can find it in a proper dictionary. That's me. Obscure. Well, you have been. But the plum can use some folks to argue with her. Good to see you're back. -- Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year! John H |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
CE ratings | ASA | |||
Bush Ratings up to 89%!!!! | General | |||
Ot BushCo's Ratings | General | |||
JD Powers Ratings are out......... | General | |||
AC/DC Switch ratings | Electronics |