On Dec 9, 2:27*pm, "Steve B" wrote:
Do you know what the word "identification" even means, dumb ass? If
you don't know what someone looks like, how in HELL would a TV "ID"
anyone?

Saw an interesting program on Jesse James the other night. *They used facial
recognition to do a lot of ID's. *Modern pictures are even better. *I have
often seen footage of a robbery, and wonder how the hell anyone could tell
who the perp was. *But then, someone calls them in. *Might be the clothing,
or several things. *Casinos use facial recognition software to photograph
people coming in the door and compare them to a database of cheats and
counters.

We won't even get into iris scans.

Steve

That's my point, you have to know what someone looks like in the first
place.

Do you know what the word "identification" even means, dumb ass? If
you don't know what someone looks like, how in HELL would a TV "ID"
anyone?

Saw an interesting program on Jesse James the other night. They used facial
recognition to do a lot of ID's. Modern pictures are even better. I have
often seen footage of a robbery, and wonder how the hell anyone could tell
who the perp was. But then, someone calls them in. Might be the clothing,
or several things. Casinos use facial recognition software to photograph
people coming in the door and compare them to a database of cheats and
counters.

We won't even get into iris scans.

Steve

On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 11:27:05 -0800, "Steve B"
wrote:




Do you know what the word "identification" even means, dumb ass? If
you don't know what someone looks like, how in HELL would a TV "ID"
anyone?

Saw an interesting program on Jesse James the other night. They used facial
recognition to do a lot of ID's. Modern pictures are even better. I have
often seen footage of a robbery, and wonder how the hell anyone could tell
who the perp was. But then, someone calls them in. Might be the clothing,
or several things. Casinos use facial recognition software to photograph
people coming in the door and compare them to a database of cheats and
counters.

I was watching that show, and reading the wikipedia article about
James at the same time. Totally different stories.
That history channel don't need no history at all.
In my opinion James was a low-life murdering reb.
But I'm from the north.

--Vic

Loogypicker wrote:
On Dec 9, 12:34 pm, "Don wrote:

"John wrote in message

...






On Tue, 8 Dec 2009 22:08:24 -0800, wrote:


wrote in message
....
On Dec 8, 9:40 am, Scott wrote:

On Dec 8, 9:24 am, wrote:


On Dec 7, 4:41 pm, Scott wrote:


" How can a Closed-Circuit TV ID someone?"


AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHA***HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH A*H*A*HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH


You are one DUMB ****. Case CLOSED.


There goes the resident low life, off on another
tangent........screaming like a rabid squirrel. Oh, did you see how
stupid I made you look with your lack of knowledge of the word
"tirade", idiot?


Not as bad as you, asking how a TV can ID someone. You dont think at
all, do you?


Do you know what the word "identification" even means, dumb ass? If
you don't know what someone looks like, how in HELL would a TV "ID"
anyone?


Loogy, we get it. So do they, but they're just egging you on. KF the dum
sumbitch and be done with it. The group is much more peaceful, and you're
blood pressure will return to normal. ;-)


--Mike


Mike, I really believe he can't do it.


You're definitely not the first to make that suggestion to him. KF'g
*both* of them is the only way I know of to stop the crap.
--


John H

Well Looney, guess you've gotten your marching orders from two of the
Dopers.
Better be careful, you could be drummed out of the Dopey Army before
Christmas and be relegated to 'no-man's land'.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Unlike you with your suck buddy Harry, I do what I want when I want.
You, Harry and slammer have nothing but your lies, childish name
calling, boorish low life postings, and the common thread that holds
you three together, your anal fixations.

I agree with this post.

On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 11:27:05 -0800, "Steve B"
wrote:

Casinos use facial recognition software to photograph
people coming in the door and compare them to a database of cheats and
counters.

To a casino a "cheat" is someone who manages to leave with more money
than they came in with.

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 11:27:05 -0800, "Steve B"
wrote:

Casinos use facial recognition software to photograph
people coming in the door and compare them to a database of cheats and
counters.

To a casino a "cheat" is someone who manages to leave with more money
than they came in with.

The governments foster this belief because they lose tax revenue when
you leave with more than you came in with.

On Dec 9, 9:21*pm, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 11:27:05 -0800, "Steve B"


To a casino a "cheat" is someone who manages to leave with more money
than they came in with.


This guy obviously didn't "cheat"

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/...n5924641.shtml

On Dec 9, 9:29*pm, Tim wrote:
On Dec 9, 9:21*pm, Wayne.B wrote:

On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 11:27:05 -0800, "Steve B"

To a casino a "cheat" is someone who manages to leave with more money
than they came in with.

This guy obviously didn't "cheat"

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/...n5924641.shtml

"Now he has filed a civil suit, claiming casino staff regularly plied
him with alcohol and painkillers in order to keep him gambling. Casino
rules and state law both say anyone who is visibly intoxicated should
not be allowed to gamble."

And it seems like it's always somebody elses fault.

On Dec 9, 11:20*pm, "Steve B" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message

...
On Dec 9, 9:29 pm, Tim wrote:

On Dec 9, 9:21 pm, Wayne.B wrote:

On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 11:27:05 -0800, "Steve B"

To a casino a "cheat" is someone who manages to leave with more money
than they came in with.

This guy obviously didn't "cheat"

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/...n5924641.shtml

"Now he has filed a civil suit, claiming casino staff regularly plied
him with alcohol and painkillers in order to keep him gambling. Casino
rules and state law both say anyone who is visibly intoxicated should
not be allowed to gamble."

And it seems like it's always somebody elses fault.

reply: *Check your snippage there, Sparky. *I didn't post any of this..

SteveB

I know. look at the secession of the headers. i posted on my post. You
and Wayne B. happen to be in there though.

"Wayne.B" wrote in message
news
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 11:27:05 -0800, "Steve B"
wrote:

Casinos use facial recognition software to photograph
people coming in the door and compare them to a database of cheats and
counters.

To a casino a "cheat" is someone who manages to leave with more money
than they came in with.

I agree. Ever since the math professor from NM (Tharp, IIRC) wrote the
book, and then they changed the table rules in Las Vegas, there has been a
war against counters. Counting isn't cheating. It's used every day in
poker, bridge, and countless other card games. But they do have the right
to ask anyone to leave their private property for any reason. On any big
win now at a casino, or even on a run of luck, you'll have people looking
down your throat and up your a** before they pay you.

I worked the "joints" in Vegas when "the boys" ran them. This corporate
mentality sucks, and Las Vegas is one big carnie midway.

Steve