In article ,
says...

On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 12:12:26 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

"The melting and freezing of moisture on top of Kilimanjaro appears to
be part of ?a natural process of dry and wet periods.? The present
melting is not the result of ?environmental damage caused by man.?

http://tinyurl.com/yjrgovc

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal...ture08520.html

Ooopsie - what with the CRU scandal, the impending NASA data scandal
(which, but the way I foretold almost two months ago), the fact that
there has been no AGW that anybody who uses real instead of faked data
can find, it's been bad couple of weeks for the Church of AGW.

Don't worry - those of us more rational folks feel your pain.

NOT!!!

I note the A. Does that mean you accept that there is global warming,
just not anthropologically caused? I ask, because some of the "flat
earthers" deny *any* global warming. For them, a few out of context
passages from some hacked emails, overweight all the retreating glaciers,
Northwest Passage access, and retreating pack ice.

For me, the science that the planet is warming, is clear. The science
that it is anthropological, is less clear. However, I have a question.
While I can't say with certainty, that global warming is anthropological,
can you say with certainty, it is not?

So already the name calling starts, now we are "flat earthers"? Is that
the new term to use around the coffee table? snerk.

There is some pretty good evidence that the warming is normal and more
related to changes in that big yellow earth warmer in the sky. Oh, and
it isn't faked either

I am Tosk wrote:
In article ,
says...
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 12:12:26 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

"The melting and freezing of moisture on top of Kilimanjaro appears to
be part of ?a natural process of dry and wet periods.? The present
melting is not the result of ?environmental damage caused by man.?

http://tinyurl.com/yjrgovc

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal...ture08520.html

Ooopsie - what with the CRU scandal, the impending NASA data scandal
(which, but the way I foretold almost two months ago), the fact that
there has been no AGW that anybody who uses real instead of faked data
can find, it's been bad couple of weeks for the Church of AGW.

Don't worry - those of us more rational folks feel your pain.

NOT!!!
I note the A. Does that mean you accept that there is global warming,
just not anthropologically caused? I ask, because some of the "flat
earthers" deny *any* global warming. For them, a few out of context
passages from some hacked emails, overweight all the retreating glaciers,
Northwest Passage access, and retreating pack ice.

For me, the science that the planet is warming, is clear. The science
that it is anthropological, is less clear. However, I have a question.
While I can't say with certainty, that global warming is anthropological,
can you say with certainty, it is not?

So already the name calling starts, now we are "flat earthers"? Is that
the new term to use around the coffee table? snerk.

There is some pretty good evidence that the warming is normal and more
related to changes in that big yellow earth warmer in the sky. Oh, and
it isn't faked either


Flat earther would be many steps up the ladder for a shiftless sloth
like you.

"I am Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 12:12:26 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

"The melting and freezing of moisture on top of Kilimanjaro appears to
be part of ?a natural process of dry and wet periods.? The present
melting is not the result of ?environmental damage caused by man.?

http://tinyurl.com/yjrgovc

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal...ture08520.html

Ooopsie - what with the CRU scandal, the impending NASA data scandal
(which, but the way I foretold almost two months ago), the fact that
there has been no AGW that anybody who uses real instead of faked data
can find, it's been bad couple of weeks for the Church of AGW.

Don't worry - those of us more rational folks feel your pain.

NOT!!!

I note the A. Does that mean you accept that there is global warming,
just not anthropologically caused? I ask, because some of the "flat
earthers" deny *any* global warming. For them, a few out of context
passages from some hacked emails, overweight all the retreating glaciers,
Northwest Passage access, and retreating pack ice.

For me, the science that the planet is warming, is clear. The science
that it is anthropological, is less clear. However, I have a question.
While I can't say with certainty, that global warming is anthropological,
can you say with certainty, it is not?

So already the name calling starts, now we are "flat earthers"? Is that
the new term to use around the coffee table? snerk.

There is some pretty good evidence that the warming is normal and more
related to changes in that big yellow earth warmer in the sky. Oh, and
it isn't faked either


No, the evidence is pretty clear that human beings are the cause of the
climate changes in recent times. Perhaps you should just be called a ludite.


--
Nom=de=Plume