Bad news for the Church of AGW...
"The melting and freezing of moisture on top of Kilimanjaro appears to
be part of “a natural process of dry and wet periods.” The present melting is not the result of “environmental damage caused by man.” http://tinyurl.com/yjrgovc http://www.nature.com/nature/journal...ture08520.html Ooopsie - what with the CRU scandal, the impending NASA data scandal (which, but the way I foretold almost two months ago), the fact that there has been no AGW that anybody who uses real instead of faked data can find, it's been bad couple of weeks for the Church of AGW. Don't worry - those of us more rational folks feel your pain. NOT!!! |
Bad news for the Church of AGW...
On Dec 5, 12:12*pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote: "The melting and freezing of moisture on top of Kilimanjaro appears to be part of *“a natural process of dry and wet periods.” The present melting is not the result of “environmental damage caused by man.” http://tinyurl.com/yjrgovc http://www.nature.com/nature/journal...ture08520.html Ooopsie - what with the CRU scandal, the impending NASA data scandal (which, but the way I foretold almost two months ago), the fact that there has been no AGW that anybody who uses real instead of faked data can find, it's been bad couple of weeks for the Church of AGW. Don't worry - those of us more rational folks feel your pain. NOT!!! Okay, so how in hell does THAT make one conclude irrefutably that global warming isn't happening? |
Bad news for the Church of AGW...
"Loogypicker" wrote in message
... On Dec 5, 12:12 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: "The melting and freezing of moisture on top of Kilimanjaro appears to be part of “a natural process of dry and wet periods.” The present melting is not the result of “environmental damage caused by man.” http://tinyurl.com/yjrgovc http://www.nature.com/nature/journal...ture08520.html Ooopsie - what with the CRU scandal, the impending NASA data scandal (which, but the way I foretold almost two months ago), the fact that there has been no AGW that anybody who uses real instead of faked data can find, it's been bad couple of weeks for the Church of AGW. Don't worry - those of us more rational folks feel your pain. NOT!!! Okay, so how in hell does THAT make one conclude irrefutably that global warming isn't happening? Ummm.... no understanding of the scientific method? -- Nom=de=Plume |
Bad news for the Church of AGW...
"Loogypicker" wrote in message ... On Dec 5, 12:12 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: "The melting and freezing of moisture on top of Kilimanjaro appears to be part of “a natural process of dry and wet periods.” The present melting is not the result of “environmental damage caused by man.” http://tinyurl.com/yjrgovc http://www.nature.com/nature/journal...ture08520.html Ooopsie - what with the CRU scandal, the impending NASA data scandal (which, but the way I foretold almost two months ago), the fact that there has been no AGW that anybody who uses real instead of faked data can find, it's been bad couple of weeks for the Church of AGW. Don't worry - those of us more rational folks feel your pain. NOT!!! Okay, so how in hell does THAT make one conclude irrefutably that global warming isn't happening? --------------- It has everything to do with blindly following the party line. |
Bad news for the Church of AGW...
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
"The melting and freezing of moisture on top of Kilimanjaro appears to be part of “a natural process of dry and wet periods.” The present melting is not the result of “environmental damage caused by man.” http://tinyurl.com/yjrgovc http://www.nature.com/nature/journal...ture08520.html Ooopsie - what with the CRU scandal, the impending NASA data scandal (which, but the way I foretold almost two months ago), the fact that there has been no AGW that anybody who uses real instead of faked data can find, it's been bad couple of weeks for the Church of AGW. Don't worry - those of us more rational folks feel your pain. NOT!!! More rational? You? giggle. |
Bad news for the Church of AGW...
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 09:24:55 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker
wrote: On Dec 5, 12:12*pm, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: "The melting and freezing of moisture on top of Kilimanjaro appears to be part of *“a natural process of dry and wet periods.” The present melting is not the result of “environmental damage caused by man.” http://tinyurl.com/yjrgovc http://www.nature.com/nature/journal...ture08520.html Ooopsie - what with the CRU scandal, the impending NASA data scandal (which, but the way I foretold almost two months ago), the fact that there has been no AGW that anybody who uses real instead of faked data can find, it's been bad couple of weeks for the Church of AGW. Don't worry - those of us more rational folks feel your pain. NOT!!! Okay, so how in hell does THAT make one conclude irrefutably that global warming isn't happening? You mean that it is, like, you know, um...political and not "science"? Ok...here... "The Met Office database is one of three main sources of temperature data analysis on which the UN’s main climate change science body relies for its assessment that global warming is a serious danger to the world. This assessment is the basis for next week’s climate change talks in Copenhagen aimed at cutting CO2 emissions." Poster's Note: The other two data sets? Um...they are based on CRU's findings including NASA's. Heh, heh, heh. "The Government is attempting to stop the Met Office from carrying out the re-examination, arguing that it would be seized upon by climate change sceptics." See that paragraph? Trying to stop the reconstruction of science for political purposes? I thought this was about SCIENCE man - come one - it's settled - what are they afraid of? http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle6945445.ece NOT!! Or how about the fact that, when world wide uncorrputed data is done in a regression analysis it shows that 87% (ex-urban temps we're talking about) show no presence of AGW? Or this - Bob Greiner, who is a complete agnostic with regards to AGW pretty much shows how the "science" was "cooked" with false and misrepresentative data. http://cubeantics.com/2009/12/the-pr...-tell-them-to/ It's a house of cards Loogy - a complete and total fraud. There there's lots more coming along - just wait until you see the NASA stuff (and believe me - they are fighting the release of the data sets tooth and nail under FOIA) and what Jim Hansen lied about. Whooeee - gonna make Algore really look stupid. |
Bad news for the Church of AGW...
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 12:12:26 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote: "The melting and freezing of moisture on top of Kilimanjaro appears to be part of “a natural process of dry and wet periods.” The present melting is not the result of “environmental damage caused by man.” http://tinyurl.com/yjrgovc http://www.nature.com/nature/journal...ture08520.html Ooopsie - what with the CRU scandal, the impending NASA data scandal (which, but the way I foretold almost two months ago), the fact that there has been no AGW that anybody who uses real instead of faked data can find, it's been bad couple of weeks for the Church of AGW. Don't worry - those of us more rational folks feel your pain. NOT!!! This damn global warming has got almost two inches of snow on my lawn. -- John H |
Bad news for the Church of AGW...
On Dec 5, 3:35*pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote: On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 09:24:55 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker wrote: On Dec 5, 12:12*pm, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: "The melting and freezing of moisture on top of Kilimanjaro appears to be part of *“a natural process of dry and wet periods.” The present melting is not the result of “environmental damage caused by man.” http://tinyurl.com/yjrgovc http://www.nature.com/nature/journal...ture08520.html Ooopsie - what with the CRU scandal, the impending NASA data scandal (which, but the way I foretold almost two months ago), the fact that there has been no AGW that anybody who uses real instead of faked data can find, it's been bad couple of weeks for the Church of AGW. Don't worry - those of us more rational folks feel your pain. NOT!!! Okay, so how in hell does THAT make one conclude irrefutably that global warming isn't happening? You mean that it is, like, you know, um...political and not "science"? No, that's not what I asked, my question, exactly was: Okay, so how in hell does THAT make one conclude irrefutably that global warming isn't happening? |
Bad news for the Church of AGW...
On Dec 5, 3:48*pm, John H wrote:
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 12:12:26 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: "The melting and freezing of moisture on top of Kilimanjaro appears to be part of *“a natural process of dry and wet periods.” The present melting is not the result of “environmental damage caused by man.” http://tinyurl.com/yjrgovc http://www.nature.com/nature/journal...ture08520.html Ooopsie - what with the CRU scandal, the impending NASA data scandal (which, but the way I foretold almost two months ago), the fact that there has been no AGW that anybody who uses real instead of faked data can find, it's been bad couple of weeks for the Church of AGW. Don't worry - those of us more rational folks feel your pain. NOT!!! This damn global warming has got almost two inches of snow on my lawn. -- John H- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - That's about the most scientifically stupid statement I've ever heard. |
Bad news for the Church of AGW...
Loogypicker wrote:
On Dec 5, 3:48 pm, John wrote: On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 12:12:26 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: "The melting and freezing of moisture on top of Kilimanjaro appears to be part of “a natural process of dry and wet periods.” The present melting is not the result of “environmental damage caused by man.” http://tinyurl.com/yjrgovc http://www.nature.com/nature/journal...ture08520.html Ooopsie - what with the CRU scandal, the impending NASA data scandal (which, but the way I foretold almost two months ago), the fact that there has been no AGW that anybody who uses real instead of faked data can find, it's been bad couple of weeks for the Church of AGW. Don't worry - those of us more rational folks feel your pain. NOT!!! This damn global warming has got almost two inches of snow on my lawn. -- John H- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - That's about the most scientifically stupid statement I've ever heard. I took it as a joke. Rob |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:11 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com