Don White wrote:
"Don wrote in message
...

"H the K (I post with a wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"John wrote in message
news On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 20:26:16 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
"Bill wrote in message
m...
wrote in message
...
wrote in message
...
John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to
win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing
federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear
power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive
down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...112303966.html
Obama talks too much. And debt spends too much. And the US
government
is broke living off a credit card.

At least he can form complete sentences, unlike his predecessor.

--
Nom=de=Plume

So could Billy Mayes and Ron Popeil still can.
Bill, I'm sorry, but what exactly are you trying to say? The previous
is
really incomprehensible to mortal men and women. Were either of these
people president of the United States?

--
Nom=de=Plume

You sound as stupid as Donny with this posting.

The space cadet plum:

http://tinyurl.com/yj8ooa6
--

John H


Poor baby! I know you feel threatened by me.



As are most of the other right-wing morons who post here.
Women they can't control are...their worst fear and threat.
You should be home, in the kitchen, barefoot, and, hopefully, pregnant.

Most of the right-wing morons here never ever even mention their
wives. Probably for good reason.


I doubt their wives would *wanr* to be publicly associated with them.


D'oh!..... gotta fatten my fingers up, they keep slipping off the keys.
............. should be *want*



That makes it...less dumb! Thanks, Bonnie!

Rob

nom=de=plume wrote:
"John wrote in message
news
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 20:26:16 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


wrote in message
...
"Bill wrote in message
m...

wrote in message
...
wrote in message
...
John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal
tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive
down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...112303966.html

Obama talks too much. And debt spends too much. And the US
government
is broke living off a credit card.


At least he can form complete sentences, unlike his predecessor.

--
Nom=de=Plume


So could Billy Mayes and Ron Popeil still can.

Bill, I'm sorry, but what exactly are you trying to say? The previous is
really incomprehensible to mortal men and women. Were either of these
people president of the United States?

--
Nom=de=Plume


You sound as stupid as Donny with this posting.


The space cadet plum:

http://tinyurl.com/yj8ooa6
--

John H


Poor baby! I know you feel threatened by me.


Again. Flattering yourself, Ms. Average.

Rob

"Rob" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"John wrote in message
news
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 20:26:16 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


wrote in message
...
"Bill wrote in message
m...

wrote in message
...
wrote in message
...
John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to
win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal
tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive
down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...112303966.html

Obama talks too much. And debt spends too much. And the US
government
is broke living off a credit card.


At least he can form complete sentences, unlike his predecessor.

--
Nom=de=Plume


So could Billy Mayes and Ron Popeil still can.

Bill, I'm sorry, but what exactly are you trying to say? The previous
is
really incomprehensible to mortal men and women. Were either of these
people president of the United States?

--
Nom=de=Plume


You sound as stupid as Donny with this posting.


The space cadet plum:

http://tinyurl.com/yj8ooa6
--

John H


Poor baby! I know you feel threatened by me.


Again. Flattering yourself, Ms. Average.

Rob


It's pretty obvious that he's threatened. Sounds like average is threatening
to you also.


--
Nom=de=Plume

On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 08:19:11 -0500, John H
wrote:

I posted a link to a Washington Post (liberal newspaper) article. If
you consider it 'political bull****', blame the Washington Post.

Why would you consider what Obama and leading Democrats are doing to
be, in your words, 'political bull****'?

Well John, you've got to admit that he has a point. We have lost a
lot of good people from this group over the years because of the
constant bickering over off topic postings, mostly political in
nature. I am not anti-nuclear power, far from it, but since it's not
about boats, boating or have much of a common group interest, it would
be eay to make the case that it doesn't belong here. And yes, I am
well aware that your post is just a drop in the bucket, but that's no
reason to take public offense when someone calls you on it. A good
example has to start somewhere, why not with you ?

Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 08:19:11 -0500, John H
wrote:

I posted a link to a Washington Post (liberal newspaper) article. If
you consider it 'political bull****', blame the Washington Post.

Why would you consider what Obama and leading Democrats are doing to
be, in your words, 'political bull****'?

Well John, you've got to admit that he has a point. We have lost a
lot of good people from this group over the years because of the
constant bickering over off topic postings, mostly political in
nature. I am not anti-nuclear power, far from it, but since it's not
about boats, boating or have much of a common group interest, it would
be eay to make the case that it doesn't belong here. And yes, I am
well aware that your post is just a drop in the bucket, but that's no
reason to take public offense when someone calls you on it. A good
example has to start somewhere, why not with you ?



Tell us again, w'hine...how big is your boat?


--
If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob,
achmed the sock puppet, or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting
your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because,
well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I
don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As
always, have a nice, simple-minded day.

H the K (I post with a Mac) wrote:
Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 08:19:11 -0500, John H
wrote:

I posted a link to a Washington Post (liberal newspaper) article. If
you consider it 'political bull****', blame the Washington Post.

Why would you consider what Obama and leading Democrats are doing to
be, in your words, 'political bull****'?

Well John, you've got to admit that he has a point. We have lost a
lot of good people from this group over the years because of the
constant bickering over off topic postings, mostly political in
nature. I am not anti-nuclear power, far from it, but since it's not
about boats, boating or have much of a common group interest, it would
be eay to make the case that it doesn't belong here. And yes, I am
well aware that your post is just a drop in the bucket, but that's no
reason to take public offense when someone calls you on it. A good
example has to start somewhere, why not with you ?



Tell us again, w'hine...how big is your boat?


Now, why in the world did I say that. I must have my head up my ass. I
know that Wayne's boat is more than twice the length of mine. Even his
small boat is longer than mine.

--
If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob,
achmed the sock puppet,or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting
your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because,
well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I
don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As
always, have a nice, simple-minded day.

On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:54:51 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 08:19:11 -0500, John H
wrote:

I posted a link to a Washington Post (liberal newspaper) article. If
you consider it 'political bull****', blame the Washington Post.

Why would you consider what Obama and leading Democrats are doing to
be, in your words, 'political bull****'?

Well John, you've got to admit that he has a point. We have lost a
lot of good people from this group over the years because of the
constant bickering over off topic postings, mostly political in
nature. I am not anti-nuclear power, far from it, but since it's not
about boats, boating or have much of a common group interest, it would
be eay to make the case that it doesn't belong here. And yes, I am
well aware that your post is just a drop in the bucket, but that's no
reason to take public offense when someone calls you on it. A good
example has to start somewhere, why not with you ?

Damn, Wayne. Didn't I just read this a couple minutes ago?

"If the Bush administration had not been so blatantly incompetent the
current administration might not have been elected. A pitch for
"change" is not nearly so compelling when things are going well."

Hellfire and damnation if that's not political, although decently
written and almost true, I might add.

If you'll notice, I have, in fact, cut way down on posting anything.
KF'g half a dozen folks does wonders for the serenity, and also leaves
time for handling the important things in life, like, well, leaves.


--

John H

On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:14:12 -0500, John H
wrote:

Damn, Wayne. Didn't I just read this a couple minutes ago?

"If the Bush administration had not been so blatantly incompetent the
current administration might not have been elected. A pitch for
"change" is not nearly so compelling when things are going well."

Hellfire and damnation if that's not political, although decently
written and almost true, I might add.

I understand your point but there are some major differences:

1. I didn't initiate the original off topic post.

2. My level of political posting on this group is almost zero.

Wayne.B wrote:
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:14:12 -0500, John H
wrote:

Damn, Wayne. Didn't I just read this a couple minutes ago?

"If the Bush administration had not been so blatantly incompetent the
current administration might not have been elected. A pitch for
"change" is not nearly so compelling when things are going well."

Hellfire and damnation if that's not political, although decently
written and almost true, I might add.

I understand your point but there are some major differences:

1. I didn't initiate the original off topic post.

2. My level of political posting on this group is almost zero.




So is you level of useful on-topic posting.

--
If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob,
achmed the sock puppet, or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting
your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because,
well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I
don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As
always, have a nice, simple-minded day.

H the K (I post with a Mac) wrote:
Wayne.B wrote:
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:14:12 -0500, John H
wrote:

Damn, Wayne. Didn't I just read this a couple minutes ago?

"If the Bush administration had not been so blatantly incompetent the
current administration might not have been elected. A pitch for
"change" is not nearly so compelling when things are going well."

Hellfire and damnation if that's not political, although decently
written and almost true, I might add.

I understand your point but there are some major differences:

1. I didn't initiate the original off topic post.

2. My level of political posting on this group is almost zero.




So is you level of useful on-topic posting.


The last thing this NG needs is someone who uses his boat. Wayne is
nothing more than a ****

--
If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob,
achmed the sock puppet, or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting
your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because,
well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I
don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As
always, have a nice, simple-minded day.