In article a06b6f1a-9f26-4d40-b55c-28f71591fc23
@e23g2000yqd.googlegroups.com, says...

On Nov 27, 9:23*am, Jim wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Nov 27, 9:14 am, Jim wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Nov 27, 7:09 am, John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.
"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "
http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7
or:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...09/11/23/AR200...
--
John H
Some of the people in "this crowd" have enough sense to not post
political bull**** after political bull**** after political bull****
to a boating newsgroup....
Lighten up Loogie.
I didn't see this post as political. The topic of nuclear power is one
that has pros and cons and is a hot topic. All alternative energy is
expensive but once in place Nuclear is probably cheaper to maintain than
solar or wind. I am concerned about what to do with the waste but
science will solve that problem, I'm sure.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

But scientists don't know anything. We need to listen to Rush,
Hannity, and the GOP.

Now who is talking political spin?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Just replying. It's true. Take global warming for instance. Ask just
about any conservative. The scientists and all of the compiled data is
just plain stupid. Rush and Hannity say that global warming isn't
happening, so disregard all of that data, right?

Well, I am sure we can talk this out as long as the ICPP, Daily Kos, New
York Lies, Jon Stewart, line of "settled science" and the idea that a
majority of scientists are supporting the idea of man made heating, can
be dismissed too... Because there is no majority of scientists
supporting it, and so many of them have been caught fudging numbers..
The real question is why would any scientist make an assumption on
proven false information?

On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 07:09:37 -0500, John H
wrote:

...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "

Sounds like political BS to me.
"Change" would be an energy task force quickly coming up with
legislation to help fund nukes NOW, without regard to climate change
legislation. Energy policy is energy policy, and everybody already
knows that nukes are "climate-friendly."
Doubt it would meet much resistance in Congress beyond the nominal
anti-nuke greenies.
Instead, it's classic DC bet-hedging, finagling and stalling.
And nothing is happening. Just talk. Just talk.
Nothing will happen until car gas hits 5 bucks a gallon.
Money talks, bull**** walks.
Hey, what does that mean anyway? Never saw bull**** really walk.
It can creep along a bit when still warm though.

--Vic

I am Tosk wrote:
In article 5a2fc011-28ed-44e0-98c3-
,
says...
On Nov 27, 7:09 am, John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...09/11/23/AR200...
--

John H
Some of the people in "this crowd" have enough sense to not post
political bull**** after political bull**** after political bull****
to a boating newsgroup....

Yeah, but some have had it with this crap from the other side for well
over a decade... It's hard not to fight back.

You couldn't fight your way out of a grocery sack. They only reason
Tom pretends you are his friend, is you are so dumb, when he is standing
next to you, he doesn't look like a FLEEG.

--
If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob,
achmed the sock puppet, or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting
your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because,
well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I
don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As
always, have a nice, simple-minded day.

H the K wrote:
I am Tosk wrote:
In article 5a2fc011-28ed-44e0-98c3-
, says...
On Nov 27, 7:09 am, John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...09/11/23/AR200...

--

John H
Some of the people in "this crowd" have enough sense to not post
political bull**** after political bull**** after political bull****
to a boating newsgroup....

Yeah, but some have had it with this crap from the other side for well
over a decade... It's hard not to fight back.


You are not equipped mentally or physically to fight back.


Poser.

I don't use a PC or Windoze.

--
If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob,
achmed the sock puppet, or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting
your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because,
well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I
don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As
always, have a nice, simple-minded day.

Spoofed...moronic grammar.


H the K wrote:
I am Tosk wrote:
In article 5a2fc011-28ed-44e0-98c3-
, says...
On Nov 27, 7:09 am, John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...09/11/23/AR200...

--

John H
Some of the people in "this crowd" have enough sense to not post
political bull**** after political bull**** after political bull****
to a boating newsgroup....

Yeah, but some have had it with this crap from the other side for well
over a decade... It's hard not to fight back.

You couldn't fight your way out of a grocery sack. They only reason
Tom pretends you are his friend, is you are so dumb, when he is standing
next to you, he doesn't look like a FLEEG.



--
If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob,
achmed the sock puppet, or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting
your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because,
well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I
don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As
always, have a nice, simple-minded day.

Spoofed...a smart person would know the word is poseur, not poser.


H the K wrote:
H the K wrote:
I am Tosk wrote:
In article 5a2fc011-28ed-44e0-98c3-
,
says...
On Nov 27, 7:09 am, John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...09/11/23/AR200...

--

John H
Some of the people in "this crowd" have enough sense to not post
political bull**** after political bull**** after political bull****
to a boating newsgroup....

Yeah, but some have had it with this crap from the other side for
well over a decade... It's hard not to fight back.


You are not equipped mentally or physically to fight back.


Poser.

I don't use a PC or Windoze.



--
If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob,
achmed the sock puppet, or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting
your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because,
well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I
don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As
always, have a nice, simple-minded day.

"John H" wrote in message
...
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...112303966.html
--

John H


It's essential that we look at all the alternatives. Nuclear needs lots of
regulation to ensure its safety, but it's doable. I just heard though there
was another incident at 3-Mile Island. I hope it wasn't as serious as the
last time.

--
Nom=de=Plume

John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...112303966.html

Obama talks too much. And debt spends too much. And the US government
is broke living off a credit card.

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...112303966.html

Obama talks too much. And debt spends too much. And the US government is
broke living off a credit card.


At least he can form complete sentences, unlike his predecessor.

--
Nom=de=Plume

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...112303966.html

Obama talks too much. And debt spends too much. And the US government
is broke living off a credit card.


At least he can form complete sentences, unlike his predecessor.

--
Nom=de=Plume


So could Billy Mayes and Ron Popeil still can.