On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 23:11:20 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...112303966.html

Obama talks too much. And debt spends too much. And the US government
is broke living off a credit card.


At least he can form complete sentences, unlike his predecessor.

--
Nom=de=Plume


So could Billy Mayes and Ron Popeil still can.

Don't recall them being elected to the US Presidency...

On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 11:05:37 -0600, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 07:09:37 -0500, John H
wrote:

...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "

Sounds like political BS to me.
"Change" would be an energy task force quickly coming up with
legislation to help fund nukes NOW, without regard to climate change
legislation. Energy policy is energy policy, and everybody already
knows that nukes are "climate-friendly."
Doubt it would meet much resistance in Congress beyond the nominal
anti-nuke greenies.
Instead, it's classic DC bet-hedging, finagling and stalling.
And nothing is happening. Just talk. Just talk.
Nothing will happen until car gas hits 5 bucks a gallon.
Money talks, bull**** walks.
Hey, what does that mean anyway? Never saw bull**** really walk.
It can creep along a bit when still warm though.

--Vic

I think someone told them that the smart folks aren't going to believe
their bull**** unless they talk serious action. Nuclear power is
serious action. But, we'll see if it's more than just talk so they'll
get taken seriously.

If Al Gore invests in nuclear power, then I'll believe they're
serious.
--

John H

On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 05:57:35 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker
wrote:

On Nov 27, 7:09*am, John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...09/11/23/AR200...
--

John H

Some of the people in "this crowd" have enough sense to not post
political bull**** after political bull**** after political bull****
to a boating newsgroup....

Perhaps you should learn to read for content instead of making quick
judgements.

I posted a link to a Washington Post (liberal newspaper) article. If
you consider it 'political bull****', blame the Washington Post.

Why would you consider what Obama and leading Democrats are doing to
be, in your words, 'political bull****'?

I don't expect a response, 'cause you got snared in your own pitiful
trap.
--

John H

On Nov 28, 8:19*am, John H wrote:
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 05:57:35 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker





wrote:
On Nov 27, 7:09*am, John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...09/11/23/AR200....
--

John H

Some of the people in "this crowd" have enough sense to not post
political bull**** after political bull**** after political bull****
to a boating newsgroup....

Perhaps you should learn to read for content instead of making quick
judgements.

I posted a link to a Washington Post (liberal newspaper) article. If
you consider it 'political bull****', blame the Washington Post.

Why would you consider what Obama and leading Democrats are doing to
be, in your words, 'political bull****'?

I don't expect a response, 'cause you got snared in your own pitiful
trap.
--

John H- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Then what you "expect" is, well, wrong. You don't think this post of
yours is political bull****? Then what's it about? Boats? Fishing?
Photography?

nom=de=plume wrote:
"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...112303966.html
Obama talks too much. And debt spends too much. And the US government is
broke living off a credit card.


At least he can form complete sentences, unlike his predecessor.

He spent several yearse practicink with a teleprompter. Thats my boy. I
am soooo prout of him.

--
If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob,
achmed the sock puppet,or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting
your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because,
well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I
don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As
always, have a nice, simple-minded day.

Bill McKee wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...112303966.html
Obama talks too much. And debt spends too much. And the US government
is broke living off a credit card.

At least he can form complete sentences, unlike his predecessor.

--
Nom=de=Plume


So could Billy Mayes and Ron Popeil still can.


It is an art that any good uzed car salseman masters early on in his
career.

--
If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob,
achmed the sock puppet,or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting
your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because,
well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I
don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As
always, have a nice, simple-minded day.

jps wrote:
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 23:11:20 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...112303966.html
Obama talks too much. And debt spends too much. And the US government
is broke living off a credit card.

At least he can form complete sentences, unlike his predecessor.

--
Nom=de=Plume

So could Billy Mayes and Ron Popeil still can.

Don't recall them being elected to the US Presidency...
They were lacking one key ingredient. Can you guess what it is?

--
If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob,
achmed the sock puppet,or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting
your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because,
well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I
don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As
always, have a nice, simple-minded day.

"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...112303966.html

Obama talks too much. And debt spends too much. And the US government
is broke living off a credit card.


At least he can form complete sentences, unlike his predecessor.

--
Nom=de=Plume


So could Billy Mayes and Ron Popeil still can.

Bill, I'm sorry, but what exactly are you trying to say? The previous is
really incomprehensible to mortal men and women. Were either of these people
president of the United States?

--
Nom=de=Plume

H the K wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...112303966.html

Obama talks too much. And debt spends too much. And the US government
is broke living off a credit card.


At least he can form complete sentences, unlike his predecessor.

He spent several yearse practicink with a teleprompter. Thats my boy. I
am soooo prout of him.


Keep it up. Has the real WAFA shut his fat ass pie hole and left the
building?

Rob

nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
John H wrote:
...than some of the naysayers in this crowd.

"The Obama administration and leading Democrats, in an effort to win
greater support for climate change legislation, are eyeing federal tax
incentives and loan guarantees to fund a new crop of nuclear power
plants across the United States that could eventually help drive down
carbon emissions. "

http://tinyurl.com/y8msqx7

or:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...112303966.html

Obama talks too much. And debt spends too much. And the US government is
broke living off a credit card.


At least he can form complete sentences, unlike his predecessor.


Sure. That's a fair comparison. So a guy that can speak well can spend
our money however he wants?


Rob