On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 13:56:46 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker
wrote:

On Nov 3, 4:27*pm, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 13:29:22 -0500, NotNow wrote:
Tosk wrote:
In article ,
says...
Tosk wrote:
In article 966da0d9-1dd6-43a8-be55-b8515900cc69
@p35g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says...
On Nov 3, 8:49 am, Tosk wrote:
In article b4f815f5-ac07-4fb9-9daf-
, says...

On Nov 3, 7:16 am, JohnH wrote:
http://www.responsibilityproject.com.../the-home-run/
Yeah, john. That was cool and a true story. Sponsoned by an "evil"
insurance company, and showing compassion for someone on an apposing
team even if it costs them. *.
Huh?
Well, as to the "evil" insurance companies, you really have to note who
is doing the name calling. When you get your info from "the boy who
cried (lied) wolf" you get what you ask for...

--
Wafa free again.
How about some FACTS, instead of innuendo and bull****? How about the
fact that in the news this morning, an ex insurance company exec told
of the private jets, with attendants, with the best food, flying all
over the country while about 70 cents of every dollar actually goes to
your insurance needs.
Al Gore works for the insurance companies now?? Didn't know that..

Surely that didn't go over your head......???

No, I just wonder why it's bad for a company exec to fly all over with
the best jets and food, but it's just fine for Pelosi and Gore...

Hey, I don't have a problem with someone making a profit. But when
insurance companies do so at the risk of lives and well being of the
people that pay them, I DO have a problem.

How much profit is legitimate, Loogy?

The amount where they forget that even though they are in the business
of helping to save lives, they instead are taking them.

Bull**** for you and your buddy.