On 10/29/09 1:42 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:42:13 -0400, H the
wrote:

On 10/29/09 12:39 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:36:46 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Oct 29, 12:03 pm, wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:02:21 -0400, H the
wrote:



On 10/29/09 11:46 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 11:36:18 -0400, H the
wrote:

On 10/29/09 10:22 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:12:14 -0400, H the
wrote:

On 10/29/09 10:02 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:12:23 -0400, H the
wrote:

On 10/29/09 9:00 AM, Tosk wrote:
In , says...

Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:33:42 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Oct 28, 8:22 pm, wrote:

The writer is obviously trying to fool everybody. He knows that this
Legislation sets a nasty portent of things to come. It is toehold
legislation to silence dissent to the prostelizing of the perverted
lifestyle, to our young and to force their way into decent society.
How long before we forced to endure San Francisco style sickening show
of perversion down our main streets?- Hide quoted text -

i agree; christianity is a perverted lifestyle. the legislation is
modeled on current federal law which makes hate crimes based on
religion illegal...

couldn't have said it better. hopefully those goddamn christians will
keep to themselves...
Am I bothering you?

Anybody with a moral core and who believes in self accountability
bothers folks like him...
And don't forget. We cleaned out his 401K.

Yup, and I am having a blast spending all that money...

What money? You're one step ahead of being homeless.

Where do you stand exactly in the class struggle?

With the middle class, of course, and those who are trying to either
attain or hang onto middleclassdom.

I am not, however, adverse to a raid through "Wall Street" and other
rapacious industries in order to round up as many heads as possible to
plant on pikes.

As for tosk, aka scott ingersoll, aka just hate, well, I think he
reached his potential when he was sweeping out horse barns.

So the lower classes are for the amusement, ridicule, and
condescension of the middle class?

Jumping to universal conclusions, eh?

An inquiry is a conclusion?

- - -

We both know your "inquiry" was no inquiry.

Jumping to conclusions, Harry?

That's the funniest bitch-slapping of harry I've read in a while. And
there have been plenty on this NG to choose from!

I can speculate that Harry probably doesn't play chess. He doesn't
seem to be able to 'see' several moves ahead.

You'd be wrong about about chess, and you and I both know your "inquiry"
was no inquiry.


Arguably, passing 'en passant' doesn't appear to be a part of your
repertiore.

Perhaps you should spend the rest of the afternoon overwriting a few
more paragraphs of nonsense. That seems to be your rice bowl.

So, you don't understand "it seems to me that a person who champions
causes to benefit the lower classes, e.g. health care reform, would
demonstrate a genuine empathy for the lower classes instead of the
condescension he marshalls in assigning insult to being lower class."

I can translate, if that's necessary.


Save your translations for justhate. Your "writing" is utterly
transparent to me. I told you, I used to teach bonehead English, and
your overwrought crap would have qualified you for that class.

On Oct 29, 1:46*pm, H the K wrote:
On 10/29/09 1:42 PM, wrote:





On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:42:13 -0400, H the
wrote:

On 10/29/09 12:39 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:36:46 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Oct 29, 12:03 pm, wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:02:21 -0400, H the
wrote:

On 10/29/09 11:46 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 11:36:18 -0400, H the
wrote:

On 10/29/09 10:22 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:12:14 -0400, H the
wrote:

On 10/29/09 10:02 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:12:23 -0400, H the
wrote:

On 10/29/09 9:00 AM, Tosk wrote:
In , says...

Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:33:42 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Oct 28, 8:22 pm, * * * *wrote:

The writer is obviously trying to fool everybody. He knows that this
Legislation sets a nasty portent of things to come. It is toehold
legislation to silence dissent to the prostelizing of the perverted
lifestyle, to our young and to force their way into decent society.
How long before we forced to endure San Francisco style sickening show
of perversion down our main streets?- Hide quoted text -

i agree; christianity is a perverted lifestyle. the legislation is
modeled on current federal law which makes hate crimes based on
religion illegal...

couldn't have said it better. hopefully those goddamn christians will
keep to themselves...
Am I bothering you?

Anybody with a moral core and who believes in self accountability
bothers folks like him...
And don't forget. We cleaned out his 401K.

Yup, and I am having a blast spending all that money...

What money? You're one step ahead of being homeless.

Where do you stand exactly in the class struggle?

With the middle class, of course, and those who are trying to either
attain or hang onto middleclassdom.

I am not, however, adverse to a raid through "Wall Street" and other
rapacious industries in order to round up as many heads as possible to
plant on pikes.

As for tosk, aka scott ingersoll, aka just hate, well, I think he
reached his potential when he was sweeping out horse barns.

So the lower classes are for the amusement, ridicule, and
condescension of the middle class?

Jumping to universal conclusions, eh?

An inquiry is a conclusion?

- - -

We both know your "inquiry" was no inquiry.

Jumping to conclusions, Harry?

That's the funniest bitch-slapping of harry I've read in a while. *And
there have been plenty on this NG to choose from!

I can speculate that Harry probably doesn't play chess. *He doesn't
seem to be able to 'see' several moves ahead.

You'd be wrong about about chess, and you and I both know your "inquiry"
was no inquiry.

Arguably, passing 'en passant' doesn't appear to be a part of your
repertiore.

Perhaps you should spend the rest of the afternoon overwriting a few
more paragraphs of nonsense. That seems to be your rice bowl.

So, you don't understand "it seems to me that a person who champions
causes to benefit the lower classes, e.g. health care reform, would
demonstrate a genuine empathy for the lower classes instead of the
condescension he marshalls in assigning insult to being lower class."

I can translate, if that's necessary.

Save your translations for justhate. Your "writing" is utterly
transparent to me. I told you, I used to teach bonehead English, and
your overwrought crap would have qualified you for that class.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

More Harrylies.....

"Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article , says...

nom=de=plume wrote:
"Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:33:42 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Oct 28, 8:22 pm, elder wrote:

The writer is obviously trying to fool everybody. He knows that
this
Legislation sets a nasty portent of things to come. It is toehold
legislation to silence dissent to the prostelizing of the perverted
lifestyle, to our young and to force their way into decent society.
How long before we forced to endure San Francisco style sickening
show
of perversion down our main streets?- Hide quoted text -

i agree; christianity is a perverted lifestyle. the legislation is
modeled on current federal law which makes hate crimes based on
religion illegal...

couldn't have said it better. hopefully those goddamn christians
will
keep to themselves...
Am I bothering you?
Anybody with a moral core and who believes in self accountability
bothers folks like him...


So, you then hold yourself accountable for electing Bush, invading a
country
we didn't need to invade, and ignoring the dire warning about bin
laden.
Good for you!

That's it. Your brightness. It's all Scotty's fault. Lol lol

Oh now it was a "dire warning" about Bin Laden. Gets better all the
time.


Look up Condi's testimony in front of Congress. She quoted the briefing.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bin_Lad...o_Strike_in_US

--
Nom=de=Plume

"Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article , says...

nom=de=plume wrote:
"Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:33:42 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Oct 28, 8:22 pm, elder wrote:

The writer is obviously trying to fool everybody. He knows that
this
Legislation sets a nasty portent of things to come. It is toehold
legislation to silence dissent to the prostelizing of the perverted
lifestyle, to our young and to force their way into decent society.
How long before we forced to endure San Francisco style sickening
show
of perversion down our main streets?- Hide quoted text -

i agree; christianity is a perverted lifestyle. the legislation is
modeled on current federal law which makes hate crimes based on
religion illegal...

couldn't have said it better. hopefully those goddamn christians
will
keep to themselves...
Am I bothering you?
Anybody with a moral core and who believes in self accountability
bothers folks like him...


So, you then hold yourself accountable for electing Bush, invading a
country
we didn't need to invade, and ignoring the dire warning about bin
laden.
Good for you!

That's it. Your brightness. It's all Scotty's fault. Lol lol

Oh now it was a "dire warning" about Bin Laden. Gets better all the
time.


You guys must really be in a lather about the truth and trying to defend
Bush. Even obvious facts, such as what I just posted, get you all riled up.
I'd suggest some blood pressure medicine.

--
Nom=de=Plume

wrote in message
...
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 23:28:59 -0400, Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:33:42 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Oct 28, 8:22 pm, elder wrote:


The writer is obviously trying to fool everybody. He knows that this
Legislation sets a nasty portent of things to come. It is toehold
legislation to silence dissent to the prostelizing of the perverted
lifestyle, to our young and to force their way into decent society.
How long before we forced to endure San Francisco style sickening
show
of perversion down our main streets?- Hide quoted text -


i agree; christianity is a perverted lifestyle. the legislation is
modeled on current federal law which makes hate crimes based on
religion illegal...

couldn't have said it better. hopefully those goddamn christians will
keep to themselves...

Am I bothering you?

Anybody with a moral core and who believes in self accountability
bothers folks like him...

There's some irony in this in that these folks want to impose their
inchoate moral agenda on the populous in the passing of legislation
that squelches speech that may be offensive or intolerant, by their
definition, and they balk at any legislation, past, present, future,
that imposes juridically a judeo-christian ethos. It's a convenient
dynamic for these folks such that subscribing to their inchoate moral
code, they don't have to subject themselves to any pangs of conscience
that is an inherent quality of a judeo-christian code. No pangs of
conscience, no problem with their double-standard.


I think you're forgetting all the lying that went on in the name of
Christian morals that happened during Bush's watch. Not to mention his own
lack of judgement, which is a moral issue in my view, not to mention the
supposed Christians that are Blackwater. We've been imposed upon enough from
them to last a lifetime.

--
Nom=de=Plume

On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:46:29 -0400, H the K
wrote:

On 10/29/09 1:42 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:42:13 -0400, H the
wrote:

On 10/29/09 12:39 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:36:46 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Oct 29, 12:03 pm, wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:02:21 -0400, H the
wrote:



On 10/29/09 11:46 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 11:36:18 -0400, H the
wrote:

On 10/29/09 10:22 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:12:14 -0400, H the
wrote:

On 10/29/09 10:02 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:12:23 -0400, H the
wrote:

On 10/29/09 9:00 AM, Tosk wrote:
In , says...

Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:33:42 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Oct 28, 8:22 pm, wrote:

The writer is obviously trying to fool everybody. He knows that this
Legislation sets a nasty portent of things to come. It is toehold
legislation to silence dissent to the prostelizing of the perverted
lifestyle, to our young and to force their way into decent society.
How long before we forced to endure San Francisco style sickening show
of perversion down our main streets?- Hide quoted text -

i agree; christianity is a perverted lifestyle. the legislation is
modeled on current federal law which makes hate crimes based on
religion illegal...

couldn't have said it better. hopefully those goddamn christians will
keep to themselves...
Am I bothering you?

Anybody with a moral core and who believes in self accountability
bothers folks like him...
And don't forget. We cleaned out his 401K.

Yup, and I am having a blast spending all that money...

What money? You're one step ahead of being homeless.

Where do you stand exactly in the class struggle?

With the middle class, of course, and those who are trying to either
attain or hang onto middleclassdom.

I am not, however, adverse to a raid through "Wall Street" and other
rapacious industries in order to round up as many heads as possible to
plant on pikes.

As for tosk, aka scott ingersoll, aka just hate, well, I think he
reached his potential when he was sweeping out horse barns.

So the lower classes are for the amusement, ridicule, and
condescension of the middle class?

Jumping to universal conclusions, eh?

An inquiry is a conclusion?

- - -

We both know your "inquiry" was no inquiry.

Jumping to conclusions, Harry?

That's the funniest bitch-slapping of harry I've read in a while. And
there have been plenty on this NG to choose from!

I can speculate that Harry probably doesn't play chess. He doesn't
seem to be able to 'see' several moves ahead.

You'd be wrong about about chess, and you and I both know your "inquiry"
was no inquiry.


Arguably, passing 'en passant' doesn't appear to be a part of your
repertiore.

Perhaps you should spend the rest of the afternoon overwriting a few
more paragraphs of nonsense. That seems to be your rice bowl.

So, you don't understand "it seems to me that a person who champions
causes to benefit the lower classes, e.g. health care reform, would
demonstrate a genuine empathy for the lower classes instead of the
condescension he marshalls in assigning insult to being lower class."

I can translate, if that's necessary.


Save your translations for justhate. Your "writing" is utterly
transparent to me. I told you, I used to teach bonehead English, and
your overwrought crap would have qualified you for that class.

And your consistently deflecting the points at issue are transparent
to everyone else. You and I both know what the issue is...

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

"Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article , says...

nom=de=plume wrote:
"BAR" wrote in message
. ..
In article ,
says...
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:44:41 -0400, H the K
wrote:

On June 7, in Texas, three white men chained an African American
named
James Byrd to a pickup truck and dragged him to his death;
Actually there were two, and one got the death penalty. I don't think
they have killed him yet.
And, on November 10th Virginia is going give a leathl injection to a
home grown Islamic terrorist by the name of John Mohammad.

There will be two things to celebrate on November 10th the birgh of my
beloved Marine Corps and the Death of the DC Sniper.


"No man is an island, entire of itself...any man's death diminishes me,
because I am involved in mankind; and therefore never send to know for
whom
the bell tolls; it tolls for thee."

It's uncanny how closely how much you resemble Harry. Even the frequent
plagiarizing.

Don't want to say I told you so, but....


Yeah, don't worry. Apparently, the quote marks are too difficult to decifer.

--
Nom=de=Plume

On 10/29/09 1:59 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:46:29 -0400, H the
wrote:

So, you don't understand "it seems to me that a person who champions
causes to benefit the lower classes, e.g. health care reform, would
demonstrate a genuine empathy for the lower classes instead of the
condescension he marshalls in assigning insult to being lower class."

I can translate, if that's necessary.


Save your translations for justhate. Your "writing" is utterly
transparent to me. I told you, I used to teach bonehead English, and
your overwrought crap would have qualified you for that class.

And your consistently deflecting the points at issue are transparent
to everyone else. You and I both know what the issue is...


- - -

I have stated any number of times here that I don't believe those on the
right have any points worth considering. The right has pretty much
destroyed this country and everything good for which it once stood, and
it wants to continue doing so. I've commented several times on your
overwrought prose.

As far as an issue goes, there is none in Scott Ingersoll. He is an
utterly useless piece of right-wing ****, someone who sucks on the
taxpayer teat, has no redeeming social value, and is an irresponsible
parent. I don't view him as a "representative" of the lower class or, in
fact, of any class. To me, he's nothing more than a piece of ****
floating on a sea of ****.

I hope that is clear enough for you. I could always rewrite it in your
(lack of) style, of course, but obscurity is not my aspiration.

On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:33:09 -0400, H the K
wrote:

On 10/29/09 1:59 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:46:29 -0400, H the
wrote:

So, you don't understand "it seems to me that a person who champions
causes to benefit the lower classes, e.g. health care reform, would
demonstrate a genuine empathy for the lower classes instead of the
condescension he marshalls in assigning insult to being lower class."

I can translate, if that's necessary.


Save your translations for justhate. Your "writing" is utterly
transparent to me. I told you, I used to teach bonehead English, and
your overwrought crap would have qualified you for that class.

And your consistently deflecting the points at issue are transparent
to everyone else. You and I both know what the issue is...


- - -

I have stated any number of times here that I don't believe those on the
right have any points worth considering. The right has pretty much
destroyed this country and everything good for which it once stood, and
it wants to continue doing so. I've commented several times on your
overwrought prose.

As far as an issue goes, there is none in Scott Ingersoll. He is an
utterly useless piece of right-wing ****, someone who sucks on the
taxpayer teat, has no redeeming social value, and is an irresponsible
parent. I don't view him as a "representative" of the lower class or, in
fact, of any class. To me, he's nothing more than a piece of ****
floating on a sea of ****.

I hope that is clear enough for you. I could always rewrite it in your
(lack of) style, of course, but obscurity is not my aspiration.

And where do you stand exactly in the class struggle, Harry? You
inarguably have made it quite clear that you deem it to be an insult
to be cast with the lower classes. What style of progressivism do you
subscribe to, Harry? One of elitism?

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

On 10/29/09 2:47 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:33:09 -0400, H the
wrote:

On 10/29/09 1:59 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:46:29 -0400, H the
wrote:

So, you don't understand "it seems to me that a person who champions
causes to benefit the lower classes, e.g. health care reform, would
demonstrate a genuine empathy for the lower classes instead of the
condescension he marshalls in assigning insult to being lower class."

I can translate, if that's necessary.


Save your translations for justhate. Your "writing" is utterly
transparent to me. I told you, I used to teach bonehead English, and
your overwrought crap would have qualified you for that class.

And your consistently deflecting the points at issue are transparent
to everyone else. You and I both know what the issue is...


- - -

I have stated any number of times here that I don't believe those on the
right have any points worth considering. The right has pretty much
destroyed this country and everything good for which it once stood, and
it wants to continue doing so. I've commented several times on your
overwrought prose.

As far as an issue goes, there is none in Scott Ingersoll. He is an
utterly useless piece of right-wing ****, someone who sucks on the
taxpayer teat, has no redeeming social value, and is an irresponsible
parent. I don't view him as a "representative" of the lower class or, in
fact, of any class. To me, he's nothing more than a piece of ****
floating on a sea of ****.

I hope that is clear enough for you. I could always rewrite it in your
(lack of) style, of course, but obscurity is not my aspiration.

And where do you stand exactly in the class struggle, Harry? You
inarguably have made it quite clear that you deem it to be an insult
to be cast with the lower classes. What style of progressivism do you
subscribe to, Harry? One of elitism?



You apparently are not a careful reader.

I assume we are not discussing Marxism here.

I stand "exactly" with the middle class, with those who are trying to
maintain their standing in it, and with those who are trying to achieve
it. I believe in extending a hand to those in the lower socioeconomic
classes who are *working* to achieve "middleclassdom." That "hand"
should include a way to pay for decent, readily available health care
insurance/coverage for themselves and their families, good public
schools, safety on the job, job retraining if they need it, et cetera.

I believe this country rises or falls on the success of the middle
class. I don't believe a right-wing financial oligarchy serves this
country. I believe that economic policy should promote expansion of the
middle class.