wrote in message
...
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 23:28:59 -0400, Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:33:42 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Oct 28, 8:22 pm, elder wrote:


The writer is obviously trying to fool everybody. He knows that this
Legislation sets a nasty portent of things to come. It is toehold
legislation to silence dissent to the prostelizing of the perverted
lifestyle, to our young and to force their way into decent society.
How long before we forced to endure San Francisco style sickening
show
of perversion down our main streets?- Hide quoted text -


i agree; christianity is a perverted lifestyle. the legislation is
modeled on current federal law which makes hate crimes based on
religion illegal...

couldn't have said it better. hopefully those goddamn christians will
keep to themselves...

Am I bothering you?

Anybody with a moral core and who believes in self accountability
bothers folks like him...

There's some irony in this in that these folks want to impose their
inchoate moral agenda on the populous in the passing of legislation
that squelches speech that may be offensive or intolerant, by their
definition, and they balk at any legislation, past, present, future,
that imposes juridically a judeo-christian ethos. It's a convenient
dynamic for these folks such that subscribing to their inchoate moral
code, they don't have to subject themselves to any pangs of conscience
that is an inherent quality of a judeo-christian code. No pangs of
conscience, no problem with their double-standard.


I think you're forgetting all the lying that went on in the name of
Christian morals that happened during Bush's watch. Not to mention his own
lack of judgement, which is a moral issue in my view, not to mention the
supposed Christians that are Blackwater. We've been imposed upon enough from
them to last a lifetime.

--
Nom=de=Plume